vsversusfinder

Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on macro and weight, Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black wins on weather and focus speed.

The Canon RF35mm F1.8 excels in macro capabilities, while the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR offers superior weather resistance and fast autofocus. Choose based on your specific needs.

Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better

Macro Capability

Canon has a 0.5x magnification ratio.

Aperture

Canon has a maximum aperture of F1.8.

Versatility

Canon is designed for EOS R series cameras.

Why Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black is better

Weather Resistance

Fujinon has 8 sealing points for weather resistance.

Autofocus Speed

Fujinon achieves autofocus in 0.08 seconds.

Price

Fujinon is $50 cheaper.

Overall score

Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black
85
Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black
78

Specifications

SpecCanon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, BlackFujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black
Max ApertureF1.8F2.0
Min Focus Dist.0.56 ft13 in
Magnification0.5x0.17x
Weather SealingNoYes
Autofocus SpeedN/A0.08 sec

Dimension comparison

Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, BlackFujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black

Overview of the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR

The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens is priced at $499.00, while the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is slightly cheaper at $449.00, making it about 10% less expensive. Both lenses are excellent choices for photographers seeking high-quality prime lenses, but they cater to different needs and preferences. The Canon lens excels in macro capabilities, whereas the Fujinon lens offers weather resistance and fast autofocus, appealing to different shooting styles.

Design and Build Quality

When it comes to design, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR boasts a weather-resistant design with eight sealing points, ensuring durability in challenging conditions. This feature allows it to operate effectively in temperatures as low as 14 degrees, making it a solid choice for outdoor photographers facing varying climates. In contrast, the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is more compact and lightweight, perfect for portability and ease of use. While both lenses are well-constructed, the Fujinon’s weather-sealing gives it an edge for those who require robustness in their equipment.

Image Quality

Image quality is paramount for any lens, and both the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR deliver impressive results. The Canon lens features a maximum aperture of F1.8, allowing for stunning depth of field and excellent low-light performance, alongside a 0.5x magnification ratio for macro photography. This means it can capture fine details in close-up shots effectively. On the other hand, the Fujinon lens, with a maximum aperture of F2.0, also provides sharp images but focuses on creating rich bokeh with its nine-blade aperture. Both lenses are capable of producing high-quality images, but their strengths cater to different photographic needs.

Autofocus Performance

Autofocus speed is crucial for many photographers, and here the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR shines with its inner focus system, achieving autofocus in just 0.08 seconds. This rapid performance makes it ideal for capturing fleeting moments, especially in dynamic shooting environments. The Canon RF35mm F1.8, while not specified for speed, benefits from its modern STM technology, which offers smooth focusing transitions, particularly useful for video recording. While both lenses perform admirably, the Fujinon’s autofocus speed may be more appealing for action-oriented photographers.

Macro Capabilities

The Canon RF35mm F1.8 stands out for its macro photography capabilities, featuring a magnification ratio of 0.5x and a minimum focusing distance of just 0.56 feet. This allows photographers to explore intricate details in their subjects, making it an excellent choice for those interested in macro work. In contrast, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR has a maximum magnification of 0.17x and a minimum working distance of approximately 13 inches, which, while adequate for general photography, does not compare to the macro prowess of the Canon lens. Therefore, for macro enthusiasts, the Canon lens is the clear winner.

Versatility and Use Cases

Versatility is another key aspect where the two lenses differ. The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is designed for use with the EOS R series cameras, making it a perfect match for Canon users looking for a versatile lens that can handle both wide-angle shots and macro photography. Conversely, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR appeals to Fujifilm photographers who need a reliable lens that excels in various environments, especially in adverse weather conditions. Both lenses serve their respective user bases well, but the choice ultimately depends on the photographer’s specific needs and camera system.

Price Point and Value

With a current price of $499.00, the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is about 11% more expensive than the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR, which is priced at $449.00. While both lenses offer excellent value for their performance, the price difference may influence budget-conscious buyers. The features of the Canon lens, particularly its macro capabilities, may justify its higher cost for those who will frequently utilize these functions. However, for those who prioritize weather resistance and quick autofocus, the Fujinon lens offers considerable value at a lower price point.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR ultimately hinges on your specific needs as a photographer. If you require a lens with macro capabilities and versatility, the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is the superior choice, albeit at a higher price. However, if you prioritize weather resistance and fast autofocus, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR presents a compelling option for about 10% less. Consider your shooting style, environment, and budget when making this decision, as both lenses excel in their respective areas.