Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black vs Big Mike's High-Power 420-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on price and stabilization, Big Mike's High-Power 420- wins on focal length and aperture.
The Canon RF35mm lens excels in versatility and image quality, while the High-Power 420-1600mm lens offers budget-friendly long-distance shooting. For serious photographers, the RF35mm is the better choice.
Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better
Image Quality
Superior low-light performance with f/1.8 aperture
Versatility
Combines wide-angle and macro capabilities
Build Quality
Compact design with user-friendly features
Why Big Mike's High-Power 420- is better
Price
Significantly cheaper at $139.99
Zoom Range
Extensive 420-1600mm zoom capability
Compatibility
Fits a wider range of Canon cameras
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black | Big Mike's High-Power 420- |
|---|---|---|
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Macro Capability | Yes | No |
| Zoom Capability | No | Yes |
| Low-Light Performance | Excellent | Limited |
| Control Ring | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and High-Power 420-1600mm Lens
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens offers a unique combination of wide-angle versatility and macro capabilities, while the High-Power 420-1600mm f/8.3 HD Manual Telephoto Zoom Lens is designed for long-distance shooting. Priced at $499.00, the Canon RF35mm lens is significantly more expensive than the telephoto lens, which retails for $139.99, making it about 72% cheaper. Depending on your photography needs, each lens serves distinct purposes in the realm of photography.
Image Quality and Performance
The Canon RF35mm lens excels in image quality with its f/1.8 aperture, allowing for excellent low-light performance and depth of field control. It features optical image stabilization at up to 5 stops, making it ideal for handheld shooting in challenging environments. In contrast, the High-Power 420-1600mm lens, while offering a vast zoom range, maintains an f/8.3 aperture, which limits its low-light capabilities. Users may find that the Canon RF35mm lens provides sharper images and better overall performance for general and macro photography.
Versatility in Photography
The Canon RF35mm lens is designed for a variety of photography styles, blending the utility of a wide-angle lens with macro capabilities, offering a 0.5x magnification ratio. This makes it suitable for everything from portraits to close-up shots of flowers and small objects. On the other hand, the High-Power 420-1600mm lens is primarily designed for capturing distant subjects like wildlife or sports, making it less versatile for everyday photography. While the telephoto lens can cover a vast range, it lacks the flexibility that the RF35mm lens brings to the table.
Build Quality and Design
Canon is known for its durable and well-built lenses, and the RF35mm is no exception. Its compact design includes a control ring for direct setting changes, which enhances user convenience. In contrast, the High-Power 420-1600mm lens, while functional, is a manual lens that may not offer the same level of user-friendly features. Photographers may find that the build quality of the Canon RF35mm lens aligns better with professional needs, ensuring longevity and reliability.
Compatibility and Use Cases
The Canon RF35mm lens is compatible with the EOS R series cameras, making it an excellent choice for users within that ecosystem. It is tailored for photographers looking for high-quality, versatile lenses for various shooting scenarios. Conversely, the High-Power 420-1600mm lens boasts compatibility with a broader range of Canon cameras, including the EOS 70D, 80D, and multiple Rebel models. This feature makes it a more accessible option for users with varied Canon camera bodies, particularly those interested in wildlife or sports photography.
Price and Value
At $499.00, the Canon RF35mm lens represents a significant investment, while the High-Power 420-1600mm lens retails at a much more budget-friendly price of $139.99. This price difference of approximately $359.01 may sway newcomers or casual photographers towards the telephoto lens. However, the RF35mm lens provides superior image quality, versatility, and build quality, which may justify the higher price for serious enthusiasts or professionals.
User Experience and Handling
The RF35mm lens features a compact design, making it easy to carry and handle during long photography sessions. Its control ring allows photographers to make quick adjustments without removing their eye from the viewfinder, enhancing the overall shooting experience. In comparison, the High-Power 420-1600mm lens, while providing impressive zoom capabilities, may require more careful handling due to its size and manual operation. Users may find the Canon RF35mm lens more intuitive and enjoyable to use, particularly for longer sessions.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and the High-Power 420-1600mm lens ultimately depends on your photography needs. If you're looking for versatility, image quality, and a well-built lens for various shooting scenarios, the Canon RF35mm lens is the clear winner despite its higher price. However, if your focus is on capturing distant subjects and you require a budget-friendly option, the High-Power 420-1600mm lens may suffice for your needs. Consider your primary photography focus and budget carefully to make the best choice.

