Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black vs Nikon NIKKOR Z
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on price and build quality, Nikon NIKKOR Z wins on focal length and aperture.
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 excels in macro capabilities and optical performance, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm offers better value and versatility. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better
Macro Capability
Canon offers a 0.5x magnification ratio.
Optical Stabilization
Canon has optical image stabilization.
Low Light Performance
Canon's f/1.8 aperture is excellent for low light.
Why Nikon NIKKOR Z is better
Price
Nikon is $222.05 cheaper.
Autofocus
Nikon features a near-silent autofocus system.
Versatility
Nikon's 40mm view is versatile for various photography styles.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black | Nikon NIKKOR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | Nikon |
| Max Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Min Focus Dist. | 0.56 ft | 0.0 ft |
| Control Ring | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 are both excellent prime lenses tailored for different photography styles. The Canon lens retails at $499.00, while the Nikon lens is notably more budget-friendly at $276.95, making it about 45% cheaper than the Canon option. Each lens offers unique features that cater to varying photographic needs, from macro photography to general-purpose shooting.
Design and Build Quality
Both lenses boast a compact and lightweight design, making them suitable for photographers who prioritize portability. The Canon RF35mm features a control ring for direct setting changes, enhancing the shooting experience. Its build quality is complemented by a minimum focusing distance of 0.56 ft, allowing for impressive close-up shots. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm also emphasizes user-friendliness with a custom control ring that can be adjusted for manual focusing or exposure settings. While both lenses are designed for mirrorless systems, the Canon's macro capabilities provide an edge for detailed close-ups.
Optical Performance
Optical performance is a critical factor in lens selection. The Canon RF35mm offers a versatile f/1.8 aperture, excellent for low-light conditions and producing a beautiful bokeh effect. Its super spectra coating effectively minimizes flare and ghosting, making it a reliable choice for backlit scenarios. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm, with its slightly larger f/2 aperture, also excels in low-light environments while providing a soft background blur thanks to its 9 rounded blade diaphragm. Both lenses deliver sharp images, but the Canon lens may appeal more to those seeking macro photography performance.
Autofocus Capabilities
Autofocus performance can significantly influence shooting efficiency. The Canon RF35mm features a fast and reliable autofocus system, making it suitable for various shooting scenarios. However, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm stands out with its near-silent autofocus system, which is particularly beneficial for video recording. This lens suppresses focus breathing, allowing for smoother transitions during filming—a clear advantage for content creators. Both lenses accommodate quick focusing, but the Nikon may be preferable for videographers.
Versatility in Use
Versatility is an essential aspect of any prime lens. The Canon RF35mm is a macro lens with a 0.5x magnification ratio, making it ideal for capturing intricate details in close-up photography. Its wide-angle design also suits landscape and street photography, providing a diverse range of applications. On the other hand, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm provides a versatile 40mm view, functioning well for street work, interiors, and portraiture. This lens allows for authentic portrayals with its natural bokeh, making it a well-rounded choice for everyday use.
Price Comparison
Price is a significant consideration for many photographers. The Canon RF35mm is priced at $499.00, whereas the Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm is much more affordable at $276.95. This price difference of approximately $222.05 may sway budget-conscious buyers towards the Nikon lens without sacrificing quality. With the Nikon lens also showing a lower average price of $210.84 over the past 90 days, it presents a compelling case for value-conscious consumers.
Compatibility and Connectivity
Compatibility with camera systems is crucial when selecting a lens. The Canon RF35mm is designed specifically for the EOS R series cameras, ensuring seamless integration and performance. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm, compatible with both FX and DX format Nikon Z series mirrorless cameras, offers flexibility for a broader range of users. On DX-format cameras, it provides a field of view equivalent to 60mm, making it a versatile option for various shooting styles.
Which should you buy?
The decision between the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 ultimately depends on your specific photography needs. If macro photography is your focus, the Canon lens is an excellent choice with its impressive magnification capabilities and optical stabilization. However, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly option with solid versatility and a fast autofocus system, the Nikon lens stands out as the better value at $276.95. Both lenses offer exceptional quality, but your choice should align with your shooting style and budget considerations.

