Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black vs Rokinon
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on price and focal length, Rokinon wins on angle of view and weight.
The Canon RF35mm offers superior versatility and advanced features, while the Rokinon 14mm provides excellent value for ultra-wide photography.
Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better
Versatility
Canon lens offers macro capabilities.
Image Stabilization
Canon lens includes optical image stabilization.
Focusing Features
Canon lens has a control ring for quick adjustments.
Why Rokinon is better
Price
Rokinon lens is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Rokinon lens is more robust for professional use.
Wide Compatibility
Rokinon lens works with multiple camera systems.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black | Rokinon |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | Rokinon |
| Macro | Yes | No |
| Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Manual Focus | No | Yes |
| Optical Design | Super Spectra | 14 elements |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens is priced at $499.00, while the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 IF ED Super Lens for Canon EF costs $231.25, making the Rokinon lens about 53% cheaper than the Canon option. This significant price difference may appeal to budget-conscious photographers looking for quality without breaking the bank. However, the higher price of the Canon lens reflects its specialized features, including macro capabilities and optical image stabilization, which might justify the extra expense for certain users.
Lens Type and Versatility
The Canon RF35mm is a versatile macro lens that combines wide-angle capabilities with a 1:2 macro optic, allowing for detailed close-up shots. In contrast, the Rokinon 14mm serves as an ultra-wide-angle lens, delivering a remarkable 115.7° angle of view, making it ideal for capturing expansive landscapes and real estate photography. While the Canon lens excels in close focusing with a minimum distance of 0.56 ft., the Rokinon offers a closest focus distance of 10.8 inches, providing less flexibility for macro photography. Each lens serves distinct photography needs, with the Canon lens being more versatile for different types of shots.
Image Quality
The Canon RF35mm boasts features such as a super spectra coating to minimize flare and ghosting, which enhances image quality in challenging lighting conditions. The lens also includes optical image stabilization that corrects up to 5 stops of shake, making it suitable for handheld shooting. On the other hand, the Rokinon 14mm is designed with 14 elements in 10 groups, optimizing sharpness and clarity across the entire frame. Its advanced optical design reduces distortion and aberrations, ensuring detailed images, particularly beneficial for landscapes and astrophotography. Both lenses provide excellent image quality, but the choice depends on the specific photographic scenarios one plans to encounter.
Focusing Features
Focusing capabilities differ significantly between the two lenses. The Canon RF35mm features a control ring for direct setting changes, enhancing the user experience for quick adjustments. It excels with its macro focusing capabilities, allowing photographers to capture intricate details. Conversely, the Rokinon 14mm relies on precision manual focus, which can be an advantage for those who prefer full control over their focus settings. However, manual focus may be less favorable for quick shooting situations. This distinction makes the Canon lens more user-friendly for those who want adaptable focusing features.
Low-Light Performance
In terms of low-light performance, the Canon RF35mm's f/1.8 maximum aperture allows for decent light intake, making it effective for various lighting conditions. However, the Rokinon 14mm, with its f/2.8 aperture, is specifically optimized for low-light scenarios, providing the ability to capture bright and clear images in challenging environments. While both lenses perform well in low-light situations, the Rokinon might have the edge for photographers focusing on nighttime landscapes or astrophotography, where expansive scenes require great detail even in dim light.
Build Quality
Build quality is another key consideration, with the Canon RF35mm being compact and lightweight, which can be a significant advantage for travel photographers. The Rokinon 14mm, while slightly heavier at 31.7 oz, is constructed with a robust design that is reliable for professional use. This durability ensures longevity in various conditions, making it suitable for outdoor photography. While both lenses are well-built, those prioritizing portability may lean towards the Canon option, while professionals may prefer the sturdiness of the Rokinon.
Compatibility
The Canon RF35mm is specifically designed for Canon RF mount cameras, making it a perfect match for EOS R series photographers. In contrast, the Rokinon 14mm is compatible with Canon EF mounts, as well as several other systems including Nikon F, Sony E, and Micro Four Thirds. This wider compatibility makes the Rokinon a versatile choice for photographers who own multiple camera systems. However, those with an EOS R series camera will find the Canon lens more seamlessly integrated with their equipment.
Which should you buy?
The decision between the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ultimately hinges on your specific photographic needs and budget. If versatility, macro capabilities, and advanced features like optical image stabilization are priorities for you, then the Canon lens may be worth the investment at $499. On the other hand, if you require a high-quality ultra-wide perspective at a significantly lower price point—about $231.25—the Rokinon lens offers excellent performance for landscapes and real estate photography. Consider your primary photography style and choose accordingly.

