Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black vs Sigma
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on macro and price, Sigma wins on low light and weight.
The Canon RF35mm offers better macro capabilities and a lower price, while the Sigma excels in low-light performance.
Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better
Price
Canon is $40 cheaper than Sigma
Macro Capability
Canon has a 0.5x magnification ratio
Weight
Canon is lighter and more portable
Why Sigma is better
Low Light
Sigma has a larger f/1.4 aperture
Durability
Sigma is dust- and splash-proof
Autofocus
Sigma accommodates Fast Hybrid AF
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black | Sigma |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.4 |
| Focusing Distance | 0.56 ft | 9.8 in |
| Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Compatibility | Canon RF | Sony E |
| Control Ring | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Lenses
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens and the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Sony E serve different purposes within the photography realm. The Canon lens is priced at $499.00, while the Sigma lens comes in at $539.00, making the Canon about 7.4% cheaper. Both lenses cater to distinct types of photography, ensuring that users can choose based on their specific needs.
Target Audience
The Canon RF35mm is ideal for photographers looking to explore both macro and wide-angle photography, making it a versatile option for various settings. Its macro capability, with a 0.5x magnification ratio, is particularly appealing to those interested in capturing detailed close-ups. Conversely, the Sigma 16mm is designed for nature and event photographers, particularly those needing a wider perspective at low light. This makes it an excellent choice for landscape and street photography.
Image Quality
In terms of image quality, the Canon RF35mm features a super spectra coating that minimizes flare and ghosting, especially beneficial in bright or backlit environments. This is crucial for achieving crisp, clear images in challenging lighting conditions. The Sigma 16mm, with its large f/1.4 aperture, excels in low light, enabling photographers to capture stunning images without the need for additional lighting. Each lens has its strengths, making them tailored to different photographic challenges.
Build and Design
The Canon RF35mm is compact and light, weighing less than many traditional lenses, which enhances portability for on-the-go shooting. It features a control ring for direct setting adjustments, providing photographers with immediate control over their settings. The Sigma 16mm also boasts a compact design, making it easy to carry around. It’s designed to be dust- and splash-proof, which adds durability for outdoor photography in various weather conditions.
Compatibility
The Canon RF35mm is specifically designed for EOS R series cameras, ensuring seamless integration with Canon's mirrorless lineup. This makes it a perfect match for users already invested in Canon’s ecosystem. On the other hand, the Sigma 16mm is compatible with Sony E mount cameras, appealing to photographers who utilize Sony’s advanced camera technology. Each lens is optimized for its respective camera system, enhancing overall performance and user experience.
Focusing Capabilities
The Canon RF35mm features a minimum focusing distance of 0.56 ft (0.17m), allowing for impressive macro photography capabilities. This lens is equipped with Optical Image Stabilization, which provides up to 5 stops of shake correction, crucial for handheld shooting. The Sigma 16mm has a minimum focusing distance of 9.8 inches, which is suitable for capturing wide scenes but may limit its macro capabilities. However, it fully accommodates Fast Hybrid AF, ensuring smooth autofocus during video shooting, which is a significant advantage for videographers.
Price Comparison
The Canon RF35mm is priced at $499.00, which is about $40 less than the Sigma 16mm at $539.00. This price difference makes the Canon more accessible for photographers who may be on a tighter budget. While both lenses offer unique features, the Canon provides a compelling option for those seeking quality at a more competitive price point, particularly for those who wish to delve into macro photography.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 largely depends on your photographic needs. If you are interested in macro photography and want a versatile lens that can also handle wide-angle shots, the Canon RF35mm is the better choice, especially considering its lower price of $499.00. However, if you're primarily focused on capturing wide landscapes or event photography in low light, the Sigma 16mm, with its superior aperture for low-light performance, may justify its higher price of $539.00. Ultimately, both lenses excel in their specific applications, making either a worthwhile investment based on your photography style.

