Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black vs Tamron 150-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on stabilization, Tamron 150- wins on price and focal length.
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is an excellent macro lens at a lower price, while the Tamron 150-500mm offers superior zoom capabilities for distant subjects.
Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better
Price
Canon is significantly cheaper at $499.
Macro Capability
Canon excels in macro photography.
Portability
Canon is more compact and lightweight.
Why Tamron 150- is better
Zoom Range
Tamron offers a 150-500mm zoom.
Image Quality
Tamron provides uncompromising image quality.
Stabilization
Tamron features advanced Vibration Compensation.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black | Tamron 150- |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | Tamron |
| Max Aperture | F1.8 | F6.7 |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Focusing Type | Macro | Ultra-Telephoto |
| Control Ring | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens is priced at $499.00, while the Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD Lens comes in at $1,199.00, making it about 17% cheaper than the Tamron lens. When evaluating camera lenses, price often plays a significant role in decision-making, particularly for amateur photographers or those on a budget. The Canon lens offers excellent value for its macro capabilities and versatility at a much lower price point compared to the Tamron's extensive zoom range, which caters to a different segment of photography.
Intended Use
The Canon RF35mm is designed primarily for macro photography, allowing for a minimum focusing distance of just 0.56 ft, making it ideal for close-up shots. In contrast, the Tamron 150-500mm is tailored for ultra-telephoto photography, providing users with a remarkable zoom capability that reaches up to 500mm. This makes the Tamron lens suitable for wildlife or sports photography where distance is crucial. Thus, the intended use of each lens is distinctly different, with the Canon focusing on close-up work and the Tamron excelling in distant subjects.
Optical Performance
Both lenses offer impressive optical performance, but their strengths cater to different photography styles. The Canon RF35mm features a super spectra coating that helps control flare and ghosting, ensuring clear images in bright or backlit conditions. Meanwhile, the Tamron 150-500mm is engineered to deliver uncompromising image quality across its entire zoom range, making it a strong contender for capturing fast-moving subjects. Each lens excels in its respective category, providing photographers with high-quality image capture tailored to specific needs.
Stabilization Features
The Canon RF35mm incorporates Optical Image Stabilization that corrects up to 5 stops of shake, which is beneficial for handheld shooting, especially in macro photography. The Tamron lens, on the other hand, features Vibration Compensation (VC) to facilitate handheld shooting at its longer focal lengths, enhancing stability during ultra-telephoto shots. Both lenses offer excellent stabilization features but cater to different shooting scenarios, with the Canon focusing on close-up stabilization and the Tamron on distant stabilization.
Compatibility
Compatibility is crucial when selecting a lens, and here, the Canon RF35mm is designed specifically for the EOS R series cameras, ensuring seamless integration and functionality. In contrast, the Tamron 150-500mm is compatible with full-frame Sony mirrorless cameras, making it versatile for users within the Sony ecosystem. This factor may heavily influence a photographer’s decision, as lens compatibility can determine the overall effectiveness and experience of using the lens.
Design and Portability
The Canon RF35mm is compact and lightweight, making it easy to carry around for daily shooting or travel photography. Its small form factor complements the sleek design of mirrorless cameras, while its macro capabilities allow for diverse shooting opportunities. Conversely, the Tamron 150-500mm, despite being an ultra-telephoto lens, is designed to be compact for its class, allowing for comfortable handheld shooting. While both lenses are portable in their own rights, the choice largely depends on whether you prioritize portability for daily use or the capability of reaching far-off subjects.
User Experience
User experience can vary significantly between the two lenses. The Canon RF35mm offers a Control Ring for direct setting changes, enhancing user interaction and making it intuitive for quick adjustments. This feature is particularly beneficial for macro photographers who need to adapt settings rapidly. On the other hand, the Tamron 150-500mm boasts high-speed, high-precision autofocus, ensuring that users won't miss critical moments. Each lens provides a user-friendly experience tailored to its functionality, whether in the close-up detail of the Canon or the swift action of the Tamron.
Which should you buy?
The decision between the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and the Tamron 150-500mm primarily hinges on your photographic needs and budget. If you are looking for a macro lens that excels in close-up photography at a more accessible price of $499.00, the Canon RF35mm is an excellent choice. However, if you require the versatility of an ultra-telephoto lens for wildlife or sports photography and are willing to invest $1,199.00, the Tamron 150-500mm is unmatched in its class. Ultimately, both lenses serve distinct purposes, making your choice dependent on the type of photography you wish to pursue.

