Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black vs Tamron 28-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on focal length and magnification, Tamron 28- wins on price and length.
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is a more affordable option with specialized macro capabilities, while the Tamron 28-75mm offers versatility for general photography.
Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better
Price
Canon is $250 cheaper than Tamron
Macro Capability
Canon excels in macro photography with 0.5x magnification
Image Stabilization
Canon offers optical image stabilization for handheld shooting
Why Tamron 28- is better
Versatility
Tamron covers a wider focal range from 28mm to 75mm
Autofocus Speed
Tamron features a fast VXD linear motor for autofocus
Build Quality
Tamron has moisture-resistant construction for outdoor use
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black | Tamron 28- |
|---|---|---|
| Focusing | Control Ring | VXD Motor |
| Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Zoom | No | Yes |
| Weather Sealing | No | Yes |
| Compatibility | Canon RF | Nikon Z |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and Tamron 28-75mm F2.8
When comparing the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens and the Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2, one can immediately notice the distinct use cases for each. The Canon lens is priced at $499.00, while the Tamron lens is available for $749.00, making the Canon about 33% cheaper. This price difference sets the stage for a deeper exploration of features that cater to different photography needs and styles.
Lens Type and Versatility
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is primarily a macro lens, offering a unique approach to wide-angle photography with a 0.5x magnification ratio. This makes it an excellent choice for close-up shots without sacrificing the ability to capture broader scenes. In contrast, the Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 is a versatile zoom lens that covers a broader range of focal lengths, from 28mm to 75mm. This zoom capability allows photographers to adapt quickly to varied shooting conditions, making it more versatile for general photography. While the Canon is specialized for macro work, the Tamron caters to those needing flexibility in their focal lengths.
Focusing Mechanism
Both lenses feature advanced focusing mechanisms tailored to their designs. The Canon RF35mm utilizes a control ring for direct setting changes, enhancing user control while shooting. It also boasts optical image stabilization that compensates for up to 5 stops of shake correction, which is crucial for handheld macro photography. On the other hand, the Tamron 28-75mm incorporates a fast and quiet VXD linear motor for high-speed autofocus, making it ideal for capturing moving subjects in dynamic environments. The difference in focus technology highlights the Canon's strength in macro settings versus the Tamron's performance in varied shooting conditions.
Build Quality and Design
Build quality is another critical factor when assessing these lenses. The Canon RF35mm is compact and designed for the Canon EOS R series cameras, making it lightweight and easy to carry. Conversely, the Tamron 28-75mm is also designed with portability in mind, measuring just 4.7 inches long and weighing 19.4 oz. Additionally, the Tamron features moisture-resistant construction and a fluorine coating, enhancing its durability against environmental challenges. While both lenses are compact, the Tamron's weather-sealing gives it an edge for outdoor photography.
Minimum Object Distance (MOD)
The Canon RF35mm has a minimum focusing distance of 0.56 feet (0.17m), allowing photographers to get up close for detailed macro shots. In contrast, the Tamron 28-75mm has a minimum object distance of 7.1 inches (0.18m) at its wide end, with a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2.7 for creative close-ups. While both lenses excel in close-up capabilities, the Canon is specifically engineered for macro photography, making it more suitable for those who prioritize capturing intricate details in small subjects.
Image Quality and Performance
When it comes to image quality, both lenses are designed to deliver excellent optical performance. The Canon RF35mm utilizes a super spectra coating to control flare and ghosting, which is particularly beneficial when shooting in bright or backlit conditions. This feature enhances the lens's ability to produce clear and vibrant images. On the other hand, the Tamron 28-75mm is noted for its compatibility with high-resolution digital cameras, ensuring sharp images across its zoom range. While both lenses promise high-quality output, the specific optical enhancements differ based on their intended uses.
Price Consideration
Price is a significant factor for many photographers. The Canon RF35mm is available for $499.00, making it a more budget-friendly option compared to the Tamron 28-75mm, which is priced at $749.00. This price difference of $250 can be a decisive factor, especially for hobbyists or those just starting in photography. The Canon lens not only offers a lower price point but also provides specialized features for macro photography, presenting a compelling case for those focusing on that genre.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens and the Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 depends on your specific photography needs. If you are focused on macro photography and require a compact lens with excellent close-up capabilities, the Canon RF35mm is a fantastic choice at a more affordable price. However, if versatility and a broader focal range are your priorities, the Tamron 28-75mm offers flexibility and advanced autofocus features that can cater to various shooting scenarios. Each lens has its strengths, and your decision should align with the specific type of photography you plan to pursue.

