Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black vs TTArtisan
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on stabilization and macro, TTArtisan wins on price and compatibility.
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 offers superior features for macro and low-light photography, while the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L is a budget-friendly option with solid performance.
Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better
Macro Capability
Canon lens excels in macro photography with a 0.5x magnification ratio.
Image Stabilization
Canon lens features optical image stabilization for better handheld shooting.
Low-Light Performance
Canon lens has a wider aperture (F1.8) for better low-light capabilities.
Why TTArtisan is better
Price
TTArtisan lens is significantly cheaper at $168.
Weight
TTArtisan lens is lighter, making it easier to carry.
Versatility
TTArtisan lens is compatible with a wider range of L-Mount cameras.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black | TTArtisan |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | F1.8 | F2.0 |
| Min Focus Dist. | 0.56 ft | 0.4m |
| Autofocus | Standard | Fast STM |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Weight | Not specified | 167-176g |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to the Lenses
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens and the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L both cater to photographers seeking high-quality optics, but they serve distinct purposes. The Canon lens is priced at $499.00, while the TTArtisan lens comes in at a much lower price of $168.00. This significant price difference of about 66% raises questions about the value and features each lens offers, making them intriguing options to compare.
Build and Design
In terms of design, the Canon RF35mm is a compact macro lens that combines versatility with specialized macro capabilities, featuring a minimum focusing distance of 0.56 ft. Conversely, the TTArtisan 40mm is also compact but weighs slightly less, ranging from 167-176g, making it easier to carry around for street or travel photography. The Canon lens is designed specifically for the EOS R series cameras, which could limit its compatibility. In contrast, the TTArtisan lens is compatible with various L-Mount system cameras, including Sigma FP and Panasonic S1RII, enhancing its versatility.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
The Canon RF35mm features an impressive F1.8 maximum aperture, ideal for achieving a shallow depth of field and excellent low-light performance. On the other hand, the TTArtisan 40mm offers an F2.0 maximum aperture, which is still commendable but slightly less capable than the Canon lens in very low-light conditions. The difference in aperture translates to the Canon being better suited for portraits and low-light scenarios, while the TTArtisan, with its F2.0, still performs admirably but may require a more careful approach in darker settings.
Autofocus Capabilities
Autofocus performance is a critical aspect of any lens, and here the TTArtisan 40mm shines with its quiet and fast autofocus system powered by an STM stepping motor. This feature ensures quick and precise focusing, making it particularly beneficial for capturing moving subjects. The Canon RF35mm lacks specific details on its autofocus system but does mention a control ring for direct setting changes, which may add to its usability, albeit not as explicitly focused on speed as the TTArtisan.
Image Stabilization
The Canon RF35mm boasts optical image stabilization that corrects up to 5 stops of shake, enhancing its usability in various shooting conditions, especially in low-light environments or at slower shutter speeds. The TTArtisan, however, does not mention any form of image stabilization, which could be a disadvantage for users who often shoot handheld or in dynamic scenarios. This stabilization feature of the Canon lens is a significant selling point for those concerned about camera shake.
Image Quality and Performance
When it comes to image quality, both lenses promise excellent results, but they achieve this through different optical designs. The Canon RF35mm utilizes a super spectra coating to control flare and ghosting, which is particularly beneficial in challenging lighting conditions. Meanwhile, the TTArtisan lens incorporates ED and aspherical elements to manage chromatic aberration while maintaining clarity. Both lenses aim for high-quality output, but the Canon lens appears to have more advanced coatings for handling difficult light situations.
Price Comparison
The Canon RF35mm is priced at $499.00, while the TTArtisan 40mm is considerably more affordable at $168.00. This makes the TTArtisan about 66% cheaper than the Canon lens, which could be a decisive factor for budget-conscious photographers. While the price may reflect the Canon lens's advanced features and capabilities, the TTArtisan still offers a solid performance for a fraction of the cost, appealing to a broader audience.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and the TTArtisan 40mm F2 L largely depends on your specific needs as a photographer. If you prioritize macro capabilities, optical image stabilization, and superior low-light performance, the Canon lens may justify its higher price point. However, if you're looking for a versatile, budget-friendly lens that performs well across various photography styles, the TTArtisan is an excellent choice. Ultimately, your decision should hinge on whether you value the specialized features of the Canon lens over the affordability and adaptability of the TTArtisan.

