Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black vs TTARTISAN AF
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on price and focal length, TTARTISAN AF wins on aperture.
The Canon RF35mm offers superior macro capabilities and stabilization, while the TTARTISAN AF 27mm is a budget-friendly, ultra-compact option for general photography.
Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better
Macro Capability
Canon lens offers 0.5x magnification.
Image Stabilization
Canon lens has optical image stabilization.
Build Quality
Canon lens is designed for EOS R series.
Why TTARTISAN AF is better
Price
TTARTISAN is significantly cheaper.
Portability
TTARTISAN has an ultra-compact pancake design.
Ease of Use
TTARTISAN features a clicked aperture ring.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black | TTARTISAN AF |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | TTARTISAN |
| Type | Macro Lens | Pancake Lens |
| Focusing | 12-pin System | Eye Recognition |
| Compatibility | Canon RF | Fuji X Mount |
| Control Ring | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens is priced at $499.00, while the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 is available for $159.99, making the TTARTISAN about 68% cheaper than the Canon lens. Both lenses cater to different photography needs and preferences, highlighting their unique features and functionalities. Understanding the differences between these two lenses can help you choose the right one for your photography style.
Design and Build Quality
The Canon RF35mm is designed as a compact macro lens, making it versatile for both general wide-angle photography and close-up macro shots with a 0.5x magnification ratio. Its minimum focusing distance of 0.56 ft offers excellent versatility. On the other hand, the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 features an ultra-compact pancake design that enhances portability, making it ideal for travel photography. The compact size of the TTARTISAN ensures ease of use while on the go, appealing to photographers who prioritize convenience without sacrificing quality.
Optical Performance
The Canon RF35mm lens boasts an impressive optical image stabilization system, correcting for up to 5 stops of shake, which can significantly enhance image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The lens also utilizes a super spectra coating to minimize flare and ghosting, ensuring clearer images. In contrast, the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 employs an STM stepping motor for smooth focusing, particularly beneficial for capturing moving subjects or recording videos. While both lenses offer unique optical advantages, the Canon lens is particularly suited for those who prioritize macro photography and stabilization.
Compatibility
Compatibility is a crucial factor when choosing a lens. The Canon RF35mm is specifically designed for Canon’s EOS R series cameras, ensuring optimal performance within this ecosystem. Conversely, the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 is tailored for Fuji X mount cameras, including popular models like the Fujifilm XS10, X-E4, and X-T4. This distinction means that the choice of lens will largely depend on the camera system you currently use or plan to use in the future.
Focusing Features
Focusing capabilities differ significantly between the two lenses. The Canon RF35mm lens integrates a 12-pin communication system that allows for precise autofocus and quick setting changes via its control ring. This feature is particularly useful for photographers who need to make adjustments on the fly. The TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8, however, features eye recognition focus, enhancing its ability to track subjects effectively. This can be a significant advantage for portrait photographers looking to capture sharp images of their subjects’ eyes.
Price Comparison
With the Canon RF35mm priced at $499.00 and the TTARTISAN AF 27mm at $159.99, there is a notable price difference of approximately $339.01. This difference represents about a 68% savings when opting for the TTARTISAN lens, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious photographers or those who are just starting their photography journey. The cost-effectiveness of the TTARTISAN lens does not compromise its quality, making it a strong contender in its category.
Intended Use Cases
The intended use cases for each lens highlight their strengths. The Canon RF35mm is particularly well-suited for macro photography, thanks to its magnification capabilities and stabilization features, making it ideal for capturing intricate details in nature or product photography. In contrast, the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8’s compact design and eye tracking make it perfect for street photography and casual shooting. Photographers who enjoy traveling light will appreciate the TTARTISAN’s portability, while those focused on detail-oriented work may prefer the Canon lens.
User Experience and Handling
User experience can significantly influence the choice of a lens. The Canon RF35mm features a control ring that allows for direct setting changes, enhancing the ease of use for photographers who need quick adjustments. In comparison, the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 includes a clicked aperture ring, facilitating a more intuitive shooting experience. The inclusion of a USB-C interface for firmware upgrades on the TTARTISAN lens also adds to its usability, allowing users to keep the lens updated with the latest performance enhancements.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 ultimately depends on your specific photography needs and budget. If you prioritize macro capabilities, image stabilization, and are willing to invest more, the Canon lens may be the better option. However, if you seek an affordable, ultra-compact lens for general photography and travel, the TTARTISAN provides excellent value at a significantly lower price. Each lens brings unique strengths to the table, ensuring that photographers can find the right fit for their creative vision.

