vsversusfinder

Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on focal length and macro ratio, VILTROX wins on price and angle of view.

The Canon RF35mm F1.8 offers excellent macro capabilities at a lower price, while the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 excels in low-light performance and wide-angle shots.

Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better

Price

Canon lens is $81 cheaper

Macro Feature

Canon offers 1:2 macro capabilities

Weight

Canon lens is lighter and more portable

Why VILTROX is better

Wide Angle

VILTROX has a 16mm focal length

Low-Light

VILTROX performs better in dim conditions

Autofocus

VILTROX has advanced face and eye recognition

Overall score

Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black
85
VILTROX
78

Specifications

SpecCanon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, BlackVILTROX
BrandCanonVILTROX
Mount TypeCanon RFNikon Z
Minimum Focus0.56 ft0.9 ft
Optical Elements915
Image StabilizationYesNo

Dimension comparison

Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, BlackVILTROX

Overview of Canon RF35mm F1.8 and VILTROX 16mm f/1.8

The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens and the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 Z Lens for Nikon Z-Mount offer distinct features and advantages tailored to different photography needs. Priced at $499.00, the Canon lens provides macro capabilities, while the VILTROX lens, at $580.00, emphasizes a wide-angle perspective. The price difference is about 17%, making the Canon lens a more budget-friendly option for photographers focused on macro and general wide-angle work.

Design and Build Quality

Both lenses are designed to be compact and versatile, but they cater to different styles. The Canon RF35mm lens is known for its lightweight and portable design, making it ideal for everyday use. Its compact size, combined with a minimum focusing distance of just 0.56 ft, allows for both macro and wide-angle photography. In contrast, the VILTROX 16mm lens, while also lightweight at 19.9oz, is designed for expansive landscapes and astrophotography, featuring a 105.6° angle of view. This makes it suitable for capturing vast scenes but might feel bulkier during extended handheld shooting.

Optical Performance

When it comes to optical performance, both lenses boast impressive capabilities. The Canon RF35mm has a 1:2 macro ratio combined with a super spectra coating, which helps control flare and ghosting, ensuring clarity and color accuracy even in challenging lighting conditions. The VILTROX 16mm f/1.8, on the other hand, features 12 groups of 15 optical elements, including three aspherical lenses, delivering ultra-high resolution and vivid detail. Photographers looking for sharp images will appreciate the optical excellence offered by both lenses, but the Canon lens's macro feature gives it an edge for close-up shots.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

The aperture sizes of both lenses greatly influence their performance in low-light situations. The Canon RF35mm has a wide f/1.8 aperture, allowing for decent light intake and enabling creative depth of field effects. However, the VILTROX 16mm lens shines in this area with its f/1.8 super large aperture, making it particularly effective for shooting in dimly lit environments. This capability is essential for photographers who often work in low-light settings or wish to achieve a shallow depth of field.

Autofocus Capabilities

Autofocus performance is another critical factor when comparing these lenses. The Canon RF35mm lens utilizes a 12-pin communication system to ensure swift and accurate focusing, essential for both macro and standard photography. The VILTROX 16mm lens enhances this with an STM stepping motor that not only provides quick autofocus but also supports face and eye recognition. This feature is particularly beneficial for portrait and street photography, allowing for precise tracking without distracting noise.

Compatibility and Versatility

Compatibility is a vital consideration for photographers when selecting a lens. The Canon RF35mm lens is designed specifically for the EOS R series cameras, ensuring seamless integration and optimal performance. In contrast, the VILTROX 16mm lens boasts a wider compatibility range, supporting various Nikon Z-Mount full-frame mirrorless cameras, including the Z5, Z6, and Z9. This versatility makes the VILTROX lens an attractive choice for Nikon users who may own multiple camera bodies and seek a lens that works across different models.

Price and Value Proposition

With the Canon RF35mm priced at $499.00 and the VILTROX at $580.00, the Canon lens presents a more attractive value proposition, being about $81 cheaper. For photographers who prioritize macro capabilities and general wide-angle functionality, the Canon lens offers excellent performance at a lower cost. However, those who frequently shoot landscapes or require a lens that excels in low-light conditions may find the additional investment in the VILTROX worthwhile for its wider angle and advanced autofocus features.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and the VILTROX 16mm f/1.8 ultimately depends on your specific photography needs and camera system. If you are a Canon EOS R series user looking for a versatile lens that can handle both macro and general photography at a competitive price, the Canon RF35mm is an excellent choice. However, if you're a Nikon user seeking a lens with superior low-light performance, a wide-angle perspective, and advanced autofocus capabilities, the VILTROX 16mm might be worth the higher price. Each lens has its strengths, so consider your shooting style and requirements before making a decision.