Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on macro and price, VILTROX wins on autofocus and weight.
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 offers excellent macro capabilities at a lower price, while the VILTROX 16mm F1.8 excels in wide-angle performance with advanced autofocus features.
Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better
Price
Canon lens is $81 cheaper
Macro Capability
Canon lens offers macro photography features
Compactness
Canon lens is more portable and lightweight
Why VILTROX is better
Wide-Angle
VILTROX lens has a wider focal length
Autofocus
VILTROX features advanced autofocus technology
Build Quality
VILTROX has a full metal body for durability
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 35mm | 16mm |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Min Focus | 0.56 ft | 0.8 ft |
| Angle of View | 63.4° | 105.6° |
| Stabilization | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and VILTROX 16mm F1.8 FE Lens
When comparing the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens and the VILTROX 16mm F1.8 FE Lens, it's essential to recognize their unique features and intended uses. The Canon lens is priced at $499.00, while the VILTROX lens costs $580.00, making the Canon lens about 14% cheaper. Each lens serves distinct purposes, catering to different photography styles and preferences.
Design and Build Quality
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is a compact macro lens, designed with versatility in mind. Its lightweight construction allows for easy handling and portability, making it a great choice for photographers on the go. In contrast, the VILTROX 16mm F1.8 boasts a full metal body, weighing 19.5 ounces, which adds durability but can be slightly heavier for extended use. While both lenses are built to withstand regular use, the Canon lens's compactness may appeal more to those who prioritize convenience.
Optical Performance
Optical performance is crucial for any lens, and both the Canon RF35mm and VILTROX 16mm excel in this regard. The Canon lens features a 0.5x magnification ratio and a minimum focusing distance of 0.56 feet, which makes it suitable for macro photography while also providing a wide-angle view. On the other hand, the VILTROX lens has a 16mm focal length, offering a 105.6° angle of view, ideal for expansive landscapes and interiors. The choice between these lenses largely depends on whether you need macro capabilities or a wider perspective.
Autofocus System
The VILTROX 16mm F1.8 is equipped with a built-in STM stepping motor, providing precise and fast autofocus, which is beneficial for capturing moving subjects or shooting in challenging lighting conditions. It also incorporates advanced eye and face recognition technology, ensuring sharp focus on subjects' faces. The Canon RF35mm does not specify such advanced autofocus features, but its optical image stabilization helps reduce shake, which can enhance overall shooting performance, especially in low-light environments.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
Regarding aperture, both lenses have a wide maximum aperture of f/1.8, allowing for good low-light performance. This feature enables photographers to shoot in dimly lit conditions without needing to raise ISO levels excessively. While the Canon lens is versatile for both macro and general photography, the VILTROX's ultra-wide-angle design further excels in capturing creative effects with a shallow depth of field, making it suitable for artistic compositions.
Compatibility and Use Cases
The Canon RF35mm is specifically designed for Canon's EOS R series cameras, ensuring perfect compatibility for users within that ecosystem. Conversely, the VILTROX 16mm is compatible with a range of Sony E-mount mirrorless cameras, making it a versatile option for Sony users. This compatibility aspect plays a significant role in decision-making for photographers, as choosing a lens that seamlessly integrates with existing equipment can enhance the shooting experience.
Price Comparison
The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is currently priced at $499.00, while the VILTROX 16mm F1.8 comes in at $580.00, representing a price difference of $81.00. This makes the Canon lens about 14% less expensive than its VILTROX counterpart. For budget-conscious photographers, this price difference may influence their choice, particularly if they are just starting or looking for a versatile lens without breaking the bank.
User Experience and Feedback
While specific sales ranks and user feedback for these lenses are not provided, the functionalities of each lens suggest they cater to different user preferences. Photographers who enjoy macro photography may find the Canon RF35mm more appealing, given its macro capabilities and compact design. Meanwhile, the VILTROX 16mm, with its advanced autofocus features and wide-angle view, could attract those interested in landscape or street photography, where capturing a broader scene is essential.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and the VILTROX 16mm F1.8 ultimately depends on your specific photography needs and the camera system you use. If you are a Canon EOS R user looking for a versatile macro lens at a lower price point, the Canon RF35mm is an excellent choice. However, if you are a Sony E-mount user in need of a high-performance wide-angle lens with advanced autofocus capabilities, the VILTROX 16mm would be the better option. Consider your shooting style, budget, and equipment compatibility to make the best decision.

