vsversusfinder

Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black vs VILTROX

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on price and build, VILTROX wins on weight.

The Canon RF35mm F1.8 offers superior macro capabilities and optical performance, while the VILTROX 25mm f1.7 is a budget-friendly option with excellent autofocus features.

Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better

Macro Capability

Canon lens offers macro functionality.

Optical Quality

Canon lens minimizes flare and ghosting.

Versatility

Canon lens serves both wide-angle and macro needs.

Why VILTROX is better

Price

VILTROX lens is significantly cheaper.

Lightweight

VILTROX lens weighs only 170 grams.

Autofocus

VILTROX features advanced eye/face AF.

Overall score

Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black
85
VILTROX
72

Specifications

SpecCanon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, BlackVILTROX
Autofocus12-pin systemSTM motor
Minimum Focus0.56 ftNot specified
Elements9 elements12 elements
CompatibilityCanon EOS RSony E-mount
Image StabilizationYesNo

Dimension comparison

Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, BlackVILTROX

Overview of the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and VILTROX 25mm f1.7

When comparing the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens and the VILTROX 25mm f1.7 E-Mount Large Aperture STM Lens, the former is priced at $499.00 while the latter is considerably more affordable at $176.00, making it about 65% cheaper. Both lenses cater to different needs, with the Canon lens offering macro capabilities, while the VILTROX is designed for broader general photography and creative effects. In this article, we will delve into various aspects of these two lenses to help you decide which one suits your needs best.

Design and Build Quality

The Canon RF35mm F1.8 features a compact and lightweight design, making it suitable for various photography situations, especially for macro shots. Its control ring allows for direct setting changes, enhancing user experience. In contrast, the VILTROX 25mm f1.7 is also lightweight at just 170 grams, making it highly portable for spontaneous shooting. However, the VILTROX lacks the macro capabilities of the Canon lens, which may limit its versatility for close-up photography.

Optical Performance

Optically, the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is designed with a super spectra coating that minimizes flare and ghosting, ensuring clear images even in challenging lighting conditions. It offers a minimum focusing distance of 0.56 feet, allowing photographers to capture detailed shots at close range. The VILTROX 25mm f1.7, on the other hand, boasts an optical structure of 12 elements in 10 groups, which includes specialized lenses aimed at enhancing image quality. While both lenses provide excellent optical performance, the Canon lens edges out when it comes to macro capabilities.

Autofocus Features

The VILTROX 25mm f1.7 excels in autofocus capabilities, featuring a built-in STM stepping motor that provides efficient and reliable performance. This lens supports eye and face autofocus, making it a great choice for portrait photographers. The Canon RF35mm F1.8 also offers a 12-pin communication system, ensuring precise autofocus, but it lacks the advanced tracking features found in the VILTROX. If fast and reliable autofocus is a priority, the VILTROX may be the better option.

Price Comparison

At $499.00, the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is a premium lens reflecting its advanced features and macro capabilities. In contrast, the VILTROX 25mm f1.7 is priced at $176.00, making it an attractive budget-friendly alternative for photographers who may not require macro functionality. This significant price difference—around $323—makes the VILTROX a compelling option for entry-level photographers or those looking to expand their lens collection without breaking the bank.

Compatibility

The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is designed specifically for Canon EOS R series cameras, ensuring seamless compatibility and performance. Meanwhile, the VILTROX 25mm f1.7 is compatible with a wide range of Sony E-mount cameras, including popular models like the A7C, A7RII, and A9. Thus, your choice may depend significantly on which camera system you already own. If you're a Canon user, the RF35mm is undoubtedly the better match, while Sony photographers will find the VILTROX to be an excellent fit for their needs.

Versatility in Use

The versatility of the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is highlighted by its ability to function as both a standard wide-angle lens and a macro lens with a magnification ratio of 0.5x. This dual functionality allows photographers to capture a variety of subjects, from landscapes to intricate close-ups. The VILTROX 25mm f1.7, while not designed for macro, provides a large aperture of F1.7, creating beautiful bokeh and making it suitable for portraiture and low-light situations. Each lens has its strengths, but the Canon lens offers more diverse shooting options.

Which should you buy?

In summary, the choice between the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and the VILTROX 25mm f1.7 largely depends on your specific photography needs and budget. The Canon lens, priced at $499.00, offers unique macro capabilities and superior optical performance, making it ideal for those who require versatility and high-quality close-up shots. On the other hand, the VILTROX lens, at a much lower price of $176.00, provides excellent value for money for photographers who prioritize portability and advanced autofocus features. If you're looking for a budget-friendly lens for general photography, the VILTROX is the clear winner. However, for more serious macro and wide-angle photography, the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is worth the investment.