vsversusfinder

Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black vs VILTROX AF

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black wins on focal length and stabilization, VILTROX AF wins on price and weight.

The Canon RF35mm F1.8 offers great value and versatility for macro and wide-angle photography, while the VILTROX AF 16mm F1.8 excels in ultra-wide-angle capabilities and build quality.

Why Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black is better

Price

Canon is $499, VILTROX is $580.

Macro Capability

Canon offers 0.5x magnification.

Image Stabilization

Canon has optical stabilization.

Why VILTROX AF is better

Build Quality

VILTROX has a full metal body.

Autofocus Speed

VILTROX features fast and quiet autofocus.

Ultra-wide Angle

VILTROX is specifically designed for ultra-wide shots.

Overall score

Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, Black
78
VILTROX AF
85

Specifications

SpecCanon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, BlackVILTROX AF
BrandCanonVILTROX
ApertureF1.8F1.8
CompatibilityCanon RFNikon Z
Control RingYesNo
Aspherical Elements3
ED Glass Elements4

Dimension comparison

Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens, BlackVILTROX AF

Overview of the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and VILTROX AF 16mm F1.8

The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is Macro STM Lens and the VILTROX AF 16mm F1.8 Z Full Frame Lens are both versatile options for photographers seeking quality lenses. The Canon lens is priced at $499.00, while the VILTROX lens is available for $580.00, making the Canon about 14% cheaper. Each lens serves different purposes, catering to varying shooting styles and preferences.

Design and Build Quality

When it comes to design and build quality, the VILTROX AF 16mm F1.8 stands out with its full metal body and compact size. Weighing just 19.5 ounces, this lens is both sturdy and manageable for extended use. In contrast, the Canon RF35mm F1.8 also boasts a compact design but lacks the all-metal construction. Its lightweight and user-friendly design make it suitable for both casual and professional photographers, but it may not feel as premium as the VILTROX.

Optical Performance

Both lenses provide impressive optical performance. The Canon RF35mm F1.8 features a minimum focusing distance of 0.56 feet and offers a 0.5x magnification ratio, making it suitable for macro photography. On the other hand, the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 excels in ultra-wide-angle shooting, with three aspherical elements and four ED glass elements that minimize color bleeding. While the Canon lens is versatile for macro and wide-angle shots, the VILTROX lens is designed specifically for capturing expansive landscapes and architectural photography.

Autofocus Capabilities

Autofocus performance is crucial for capturing sharp images quickly. The VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 boasts fast, precise, and quiet autofocus capabilities, supporting both stills and video. Its minimum focus distance of just 0.88 feet allows for dynamic close-ups, enhancing its versatility. The Canon RF35mm F1.8 also features a control ring for direct setting changes, but its autofocus system isn’t emphasized to the same extent as the VILTROX. Photographers who prioritize quick autofocus may prefer the VILTROX lens.

Image Stabilization

Image stabilization can significantly impact image quality, especially in low-light scenarios. The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is equipped with optical image stabilization that corrects up to 5 stops of shake, making it a reliable choice for handheld shooting. In contrast, the VILTROX AF 16mm does not mention image stabilization features. Photographers who often shoot in challenging lighting conditions will find the stabilization in the Canon lens particularly beneficial.

Compatibility

Compatibility can be a decisive factor in choosing a lens. The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is specifically designed for the EOS R series cameras, ensuring seamless integration. Meanwhile, the VILTROX AF 16mm f/1.8 is compatible with a broad range of Nikon Z-mount mirrorless cameras, including popular models like the Z9 and Z7II. If you own a Nikon camera, the VILTROX lens offers a more suitable option, while Canon users will find the RF35mm a perfect match.

Price Comparison

The price difference between these two lenses is notable. The Canon RF35mm F1.8 is priced at $499.00, making it about 14% less expensive than the VILTROX AF 16mm, which retails for $580.00. This price point makes the Canon lens an appealing option for those on a budget or those looking to invest in a versatile macro lens without breaking the bank. The VILTROX, while more expensive, may justify its cost through its advanced features and build quality.

Which should you buy?

Selecting between the Canon RF35mm F1.8 and the VILTROX AF 16mm F1.8 ultimately depends on your photographic needs. If you seek a cost-effective, versatile lens suitable for both macro and wide-angle photography, the Canon RF35mm F1.8 is an excellent choice. However, if you require a compact, ultra-wide-angle lens with superior autofocus capabilities and a robust build, the VILTROX AF 16mm F1.8 may be worth the investment. Consider your camera compatibility and shooting style to make the best choice for your photography journey.