vsversusfinder

Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM vs Tamron

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM wins on price and focal length, Tamron wins on aperture and magnification.

The Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM excels in low-light performance and image quality, while the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 offers versatility and portability at a lower price.

Why Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM is better

Aperture

f/1.2 allows for better low-light performance

Image Quality

Superior optical performance with reduced aberrations

Bokeh

Creates beautiful background blur for portraits

Why Tamron is better

Price

Significantly cheaper at $199

Weight

Lightweight design at 7.6oz

Weather Resistance

Moisture-resistant construction for outdoor use

Overall score

Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM
88
Tamron
75

Specifications

SpecCanon RF45mm F1.2 STMTamron
BrandCanonTamron
Aperturef/1.2f/2.8
Weight0.88 lbs0.48 lbs
Length3.5 in2.5 in
Focal Length45mm24mm

Dimension comparison

Canon RF45mm F1.2 STMTamron

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM is significantly more expensive than the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2, with a current price of $469.00 compared to $199.00 for the Tamron lens. This makes the Tamron lens about 57% cheaper than the Canon option. The price difference reflects the different capabilities and target markets of these lenses; while the Canon lens offers a large f/1.2 aperture suitable for low-light conditions and portrait photography, the Tamron lens is designed for wide-angle shots and everyday versatility.

Build Quality and Design

The Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM is designed with a large-diameter mount and a compact body, making it both functional and aesthetically pleasing. The lens features a short back focus and digital distortion correction, ensuring high-quality images with minimal aberrations. On the other hand, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 boasts a compact and lightweight design, measuring just 2.5 inches in length and weighing 7.6 ounces. This makes it ideal for photographers who prioritize portability and ease of use during all-day shoots. Both lenses are well-constructed, but they cater to different shooting styles and preferences.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

The Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM shines in low-light situations due to its impressive f/1.2 aperture, allowing for faster shutter speeds and excellent bokeh effects. This capability is perfect for portrait photography, where isolating subjects from the background is key. In contrast, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 features a moderately sized f/2.8 aperture, which is adequate for general photography but may struggle in low-light scenarios compared to the Canon lens. While the Tamron can create beautiful close-ups with its background bokeh, it does not match the low-light prowess of the Canon lens.

Focal Length and Versatility

The Canon RF45mm offers a standard focal length of 45mm, which is versatile enough for portraits and lifestyle shots. It allows for a three-dimensional look, making it suitable for a variety of creative applications. The Tamron 24mm, however, provides a wider angle, making it ideal for landscapes, city scenes, and candid snapshots. With a 1:2 maximum magnification ratio, the Tamron lens excels at macro-style photography, allowing unique close-ups. The choice between these lenses largely depends on your photographic needs—whether you prioritize the versatility of a wider angle or the refined qualities of a standard prime lens.

Image Quality

In terms of image quality, the Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM is engineered for exceptional performance, featuring one PMo aspheric lens that reduces aberrations, a first for Canon in a f/1.2 lens. This results in stunning imagery with rich detail and smooth backgrounds. The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is also designed to deliver sharp images, utilizing special glass materials to minimize aberrations. While both lenses promise high-quality results, the enhanced optical performance of the Canon lens may appeal more to professional photographers seeking the best results in challenging conditions.

Use Cases

The Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM is an excellent choice for portrait and lifestyle photographers who need a lens that performs well in low-light situations and provides beautiful bokeh. Its f/1.2 aperture and compact design make it a powerful tool for creating expressive visuals. In contrast, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is perfect for those who enjoy wide-angle photography, such as landscapes, street photography, and candid moments. Its lightweight design makes it easy to carry on long shoots, making it suitable for travel photographers or anyone needing a versatile lens for everyday use.

Weather Resistance

The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 features moisture-resistant construction and a dirt-resistant fluorine coating, which adds to its durability and reliability for outdoor shooting. Photographers can confidently use this lens in various weather conditions without worrying about damaging the equipment. Meanwhile, the Canon RF45mm F1.2 does not specifically highlight similar protective features. For photographers who frequently shoot outdoors or in unpredictable environments, the Tamron lens may offer an advantage in terms of ruggedness and longevity.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM and the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 ultimately depends on your photographic needs and budget. If you require a lens for low-light conditions with beautiful bokeh for portraits, the Canon lens is worth the investment despite its higher price of $469.00. However, if you prefer a lightweight, compact lens for general photography and wide-angle shots, the Tamron at $199.00 is an excellent choice that offers great versatility. Consider your shooting style and the types of images you want to create when making your decision.