Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM vs Tamron 70-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM wins on aperture and length, Tamron 70- wins on weight and portability.
The Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM excels in low-light performance and image quality, while the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 offers versatility and portability at a lower price.
Why Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM is better
Image Quality
Superior low-light performance and bokeh.
Aperture
Wider f/1.2 aperture for better subject isolation.
Build Quality
Designed for high image clarity with minimal aberrations.
Why Tamron 70- is better
Portability
Lighter and more compact for handheld shooting.
Versatility
Wide focal range suitable for various photography styles.
Price
More budget-friendly option.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM | Tamron 70- |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 45mm | 70-300mm |
| Max Aperture | f/1.2 | f/4.5-6.3 |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Autofocus | Standard | RXD |
| Moisture Resistance | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM
The Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM is designed for creators seeking a wide-aperture prime lens that excels in low-light conditions. This lens is priced at $469.00, positioning it as a premium option for photographers who prioritize image quality and bokeh effects. With an f/1.2 aperture, it allows for faster shutter speeds, making it ideal for capturing subjects in darker environments. Additionally, its design incorporates a PMo aspheric lens to minimize aberrations, enhancing image clarity.
The RF45mm F1.2 STM stands out for its ability to create images with a three-dimensional look, effectively isolating subjects from the background. This characteristic is particularly valuable for portrait and lifestyle photography, where subject prominence is crucial.
Overview of Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD
The Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD is a versatile telephoto zoom lens priced at $399.00, making it about 17% cheaper than the Canon RF45mm. This lens caters to photographers of all skill levels and is designed for Sony full-frame and APS-C E-mount mirrorless cameras. Its focal length range allows for a wide variety of shooting scenarios, from landscapes to wildlife.
Weighing just 19.2 oz and measuring 5.8 inches in length, the lens is exceptionally portable, making it suitable for handheld shooting in dynamic environments. The lens also features a moisture-resistant construction, which adds to its durability during outdoor use.
Image Quality Comparison
In terms of image quality, the Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM offers a significant advantage for low-light situations. Its f/1.2 aperture is key for achieving stunning bokeh and subject isolation, which are critical for portrait photography. The lens's design minimizes aberrations, promising sharp and clear images even at wide apertures.
Conversely, the Tamron 70-300mm excels in versatility, delivering high-quality images across its zoom range. With 15 elements arranged in 10 groups to correct chromatic aberrations, the Tamron lens also provides impressive resolution. However, its maximum aperture of f/4.5-6.3 does not match the low-light performance of the Canon lens.
Portability and Build Quality
When it comes to portability, the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 is a clear winner due to its lightweight design and compact dimensions. This makes it an excellent choice for photographers who need to move quickly and capture spontaneous moments. The moisture-resistant construction further enhances its usability in various weather conditions.
On the other hand, while the Canon RF45mm F1.2 is compact for a prime lens, it is heavier and less versatile in terms of focal length. The difference in design focuses more on achieving high image quality rather than optimizing for portability.
Autofocus Performance
The Tamron 70-300mm features the RXD (Rapid eXtra-silent stepping Drive) unit, which ensures quiet and fast autofocus. This is particularly beneficial for shooting video or in quiet environments where noise can be distracting. The lens is designed to accommodate both casual and professional shooters, providing a user-friendly experience.
The Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM, while not explicitly noted for its autofocus speed, is built to deliver high-quality images with effective placement of lens elements to minimize aberrations. However, it may not match the rapid autofocus capabilities of the Tamron, especially in dynamic shooting conditions.
Versatility in Shooting Scenarios
The Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 shines in versatility, accommodating a broad range of photography styles from landscapes to sports. Its telephoto capabilities allow for dynamic framing of distant subjects, making it suitable for wildlife photography and action shots.
In contrast, the Canon RF45mm F1.2 excels in more specific scenarios, such as portrait and lifestyle photography. Its capability to produce stunning bokeh and subject isolation makes it less versatile than the Tamron but offers superior quality for specific types of images.
Price Comparison
The Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM is priced at $469.00, while the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 is available for $399.00. This price difference of $70 reflects the premium quality and specific use case that Canon aims for with its prime lens. The Tamron's lower price point makes it an attractive option for those seeking versatility without sacrificing image quality.
While both lenses provide excellent value in their respective categories, potential buyers should consider their specific photographic needs when assessing this price difference.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM and the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD hinges on your photographic style and requirements. If you prioritize exceptional low-light performance and stunning bokeh for portrait work, the Canon lens is the ideal choice, albeit at a higher price. Conversely, if versatility and portability are your main criteria, the Tamron lens offers a wider focal range and a more budget-friendly option, making it a compelling choice for various shooting situations.

