vsversusfinder

Canon RF70- vs Tamron 35-

Updated July 2026 — Canon RF70- wins on weight and stabilization, Tamron 35- wins on compatibility.

The Canon RF70-200mm offers superior image stabilization and autofocus, making it ideal for professionals, while the Tamron 35-150mm provides excellent versatility at a more accessible price.

Why Canon RF70- is better

Image Stabilization

Canon offers up to 5 stops of shake correction.

Autofocus Speed

Canon's dual Nano USM technology provides fast and quiet autofocus.

Build Quality

Canon lens is dust and weather-resistant.

Why Tamron 35- is better

Price

Tamron is significantly cheaper at $1,499.

Versatility

Tamron covers a wider focal range from 35mm to 150mm.

Warranty

Tamron includes a 6-year limited USA warranty.

Overall score

Canon RF70-
88
Tamron 35-
76

Specifications

SpecCanon RF70-Tamron 35-
Focal Length70-200mm35-150mm
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2-2.8
Image StabilizationYesNo
Autofocus TypeDual Nano USMVXD Linear Motor
Weight3.2 lbs2.6 lbs

Dimension comparison

Canon RF70-Tamron 35-

Overview of the Canon RF70-200mm and Tamron 35-150mm Lenses

The Canon RF70-200mm F2.8 L is USM Lens is a high-end telephoto zoom lens designed for Canon’s EOS R series, while the Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD serves Sony E-Mount cameras. The difference in their focal lengths and aperture range makes each lens suited for different types of photography. The Canon lens is priced at $2,799.00, making it about 87% more expensive than the Tamron lens, which retails for $1,499.00. This significant price difference reflects the unique features and intended uses of each lens.

Image Quality and Performance

When it comes to image quality, the Canon RF70-200mm is designed with a bright f/2.8 aperture that allows for high image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. Its optical image stabilization offers up to 5 stops of shake correction, making it a suitable choice for capturing sharp images in challenging environments. On the other hand, the Tamron 35-150mm also boasts outstanding optical performance throughout its zoom range and is the first of its kind to offer an f/2-2.8 aperture. This means both lenses promise excellent image quality but cater to different photographic styles and needs.

Autofocus Capabilities

The autofocus systems of both lenses are noteworthy. The Canon RF70-200mm utilizes Canon’s dual Nano USM technology for fast, smooth, and quiet autofocus, making it ideal for portrait, wedding, and wildlife photography. In comparison, the Tamron 35-150mm incorporates a VXD linear motor that delivers high-speed and high-precision autofocus. While both systems are optimized for their respective lenses, the Canon's autofocus is particularly advantageous for sports photography where rapid subject tracking is essential.

Portability and Design

Portability is a crucial factor for photographers who travel often. The Canon RF70-200mm is touted as Canon’s lightest and shortest 70-200mm f/2.8 lens, making it easier to carry during long shoots. Its dust- and weather-resistant construction adds to its portability, allowing photographers to work in various environments confidently. Conversely, the Tamron 35-150mm measures 6.2 inches in length and weighs 41.1 ounces. While it also offers a compact design, its bulkiness may be a consideration for on-the-go photographers compared to the Canon lens.

Compatibility and Use Cases

Compatibility is an essential aspect when choosing a lens. The Canon RF70-200mm is specifically designed for Canon's full-frame mirrorless cameras, including the EOS RP, EOS R, EOS R5, and EOS R6. This lens excels in landscapes and sports photography due to its extended focal length. Meanwhile, the Tamron 35-150mm is compatible with both full-frame and APS-C Sony E-Mount cameras, making it a versatile option for travel and portrait photography. Its adaptability allows photographers to easily transition between wide-angle and telephoto shots without the need to change lenses frequently.

Pricing and Value for Money

The Canon RF70-200mm is priced at $2,799.00, while the Tamron 35-150mm is more budget-friendly at $1,499.00. The price difference of about $1,300 indicates that the Canon lens is tailored for professionals who require high-end performance and are willing to invest for quality. The Tamron lens, priced about 46% lower, offers excellent value for enthusiasts and professionals looking for versatility without breaking the bank. The Tamron's 6-year limited USA warranty adds to its appeal, enhancing its value proposition.

User Experience and Feedback

Both lenses have been well-received in the photography community, though specific user feedback varies based on individual needs. The Canon RF70-200mm is often praised for its image stabilization and autofocus capabilities, essential features for event photographers. Meanwhile, the Tamron 35-150mm is lauded for its unique zoom range and fast aperture, making it a favorite among travel and portrait photographers. Each lens caters to different user experiences, and the choice largely depends on the photographer's specific requirements.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Canon RF70-200mm and the Tamron 35-150mm comes down to your photography style and budget. If you are a professional photographer looking for a high-performance lens primarily for Canon cameras, the RF70-200mm is worth the investment for its superior autofocus and image stabilization. However, if you seek versatility at a more accessible price point, the Tamron 35-150mm is an excellent choice, especially for those using Sony E-Mount cameras. Ultimately, your decision should align with your specific photographic needs and financial considerations.