Canon RF75- vs FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 R WR Lens, Black
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF75- wins on weight and focal length, FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 R WR Lens, Black wins on price and weather seal.
The Canon RF75-300mm offers better value and versatility, while the Fujifilm XF23mm excels in optical quality and weather resistance.
Why Canon RF75- is better
Price
Canon lens is $239, significantly cheaper than Fujifilm's $499.
Versatility
Canon's 300mm zoom range allows for diverse photography styles.
Included Accessories
Canon comes with a comprehensive cleaning kit and filters.
Why FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 R WR Lens, Black is better
Optical Quality
Fujifilm features refined optical construction for better detail.
Weather Resistance
Fujifilm is designed to withstand dust and moisture.
Bokeh
Fujifilm's 11-blade aperture creates superior bokeh.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF75- | FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 R WR Lens, Black |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Canon | Fujifilm |
| Aperture | F4-5.6 | F2.8 |
| Zoom | Yes | No |
| Close Focus | 1.5m | 20cm |
| Bokeh | Standard | Superior |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Canon RF75-300mm F4-5.6 Zoom Lens is priced at $239.00, making it significantly more affordable than the FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 R WR Lens, which costs $499.00. This represents a price difference of $260, or about 109%, highlighting the Canon lens as the budget-friendly option in this comparison. If you are looking for a lens that offers versatility without breaking the bank, the Canon RF75-300mm is an attractive choice. In contrast, the Fujifilm lens is aimed at those who are willing to invest more for specific features and performance.
Build Quality and Design
In terms of build quality, the FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 R WR Lens is designed to be weather-resistant, providing protection from dust, moisture, and temperatures as low as -10°C (14°F). This makes it ideal for photographers who often shoot in challenging weather conditions. On the other hand, while the Canon RF75-300mm is compact and lightweight, it does not emphasize weather sealing in its features. Weighing about the same as a 500ml water bottle, it is designed for portability, but the build may not offer the same ruggedness as the Fujifilm lens.
Focal Length and Versatility
The focal length differences between the two lenses cater to different photography styles. The Canon RF75-300mm features a versatile zoom range that extends up to 300mm, allowing for dramatic shots from a distance. This makes it suitable for wildlife and sports photography. In contrast, the FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mm offers a fixed focal length of 23mm, which is perfect for street photography and landscapes but limits versatility in capturing distant subjects. Therefore, if you need a lens that can adapt to a variety of scenes, the Canon RF75-300mm might be the better option.
Optical Performance
Optical performance is a key consideration for any lens. The FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mm boasts refined optical construction with two aspherical elements that enhance detail and overall image quality. It also features an 11-blade aperture, which contributes to beautiful bokeh in out-of-focus areas, ideal for portraits and creative photography. Meanwhile, the Canon RF75-300mm focuses on functionality with Eye detection capabilities, allowing for precise autofocus even at longer distances. While both lenses offer strong optical performance, the Fujifilm lens may offer superior image quality, particularly in controlled shooting environments.
Focus Capabilities
Focusing capabilities differ significantly between the two lenses. The Canon RF75-300mm includes advanced Eye detection, allowing photographers to capture sharp images of moving subjects with Servo AF, which is beneficial for both stills and video. This feature is particularly advantageous for wildlife and action photography. In contrast, the FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mm has a close focusing distance of 20cm (7.87 inches), allowing for detailed close-ups, but it does not emphasize autofocus technology to the same extent. Those who prioritize quick and reliable focusing may prefer the Canon lens.
Included Accessories
When it comes to included accessories, the Canon RF75-300mm comes with a Canon 58mm Lens Cap, a Canon RF Rear Lens Cap, a UV filter, a lens cap keeper, and a cleaning kit that includes a blower, lens pen, brush, and case. This comprehensive set of accessories adds value to the Canon lens purchase. On the other hand, the FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mm does not specify any included accessories, which may require additional investment for protection and maintenance. For those who appreciate a complete package, the Canon lens stands out.
Target Audience
The target audience for these lenses varies based on their specific needs. The Canon RF75-300mm is aimed at budget-conscious photographers who require a versatile lens for various scenarios, especially those involving distance. Its lightweight design and included accessories make it appealing for casual and hobbyist photographers. Conversely, the FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mm is tailored for enthusiasts and professionals who demand high optical quality and weather resistance, making it preferable for serious street and landscape photographers. The choice between these two lenses ultimately depends on the user’s photography style and budget.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF75-300mm F4-5.6 Zoom Lens and the FUJIFILM FUJINON XF23mmF2.8 R WR Lens ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize versatility, affordability, and a comprehensive accessory package, the Canon lens is the clear winner at $239.00. However, if you seek superior optical performance and weather resistance for more demanding photography, the Fujifilm lens, despite its higher price of $499.00, might be worth the investment.

