Canon RF75- vs Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF75- wins on price and focal length, Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black wins on weight and build quality.
The Canon RF75-300mm offers great versatility at a budget price, while the Fujinon XF35mmF2 excels in image quality and performance.
Why Canon RF75- is better
Price
Canon is significantly cheaper at $239.
Versatility
Canon offers a wider focal length range.
Weight
Canon is more portable and lightweight.
Why Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black is better
Image Quality
Fujinon provides superior sharpness and bokeh.
Autofocus Speed
Fujinon has a faster autofocus at 0.08 seconds.
Weather Resistance
Fujinon is designed for extreme conditions.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF75- | Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | F4-5.6 | F2.0 |
| Weather Seals | No | Yes |
| Focal Length | 75-300mm | 35mm |
| Autofocus Speed | N/A | 0.08s |
| Bokeh | Standard | Smooth |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF75-300mm F4-5.6 Zoom Lens
The Canon RF75-300mm F4-5.6 Zoom Lens is priced at $239.00, making it a budget-friendly option for photography enthusiasts. This lens is designed for Canon EOS R series cameras and offers a versatile focal length range, reaching up to 300mm. It is lightweight and portable, which makes it an excellent choice for those who want to capture distant subjects without the bulk of a traditional telephoto lens.
Overview of the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR
The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is priced at $449.00, making it significantly more expensive than the Canon RF75-300mm. This lens is a prime lens that offers exceptional image quality, with a maximum aperture of F2.0. It is designed for Fujifilm cameras and is weather-resistant, providing durability for shooting in challenging conditions. Its compact size and fast autofocus make it a strong contender for street and portrait photography.
Design and Build Quality
In terms of design, the Canon RF75-300mm is compact and lightweight, resembling the weight of a 500ml water bottle. It is ideal for photographers who prioritize portability. Conversely, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR boasts a weather-resistant design with eight sealing points, ensuring operation even in extreme conditions down to 14 degrees. While both lenses are designed for specific needs, the Fujinon offers a sturdier build for outdoor photographers, albeit at a higher price point.
Image Quality
Image quality is where the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR shines, thanks to its F2.0 aperture, which enables rich bokeh and sharp images. The lens also features Nano-GI coating to minimize ghosting and flare. The Canon RF75-300mm, while versatile, focuses more on range than on aperture size. Its ability to achieve eye detection at 300mm is impressive, but the overall image quality may not match the sharpness and detail provided by the Fujinon lens at its optimal focal length.
Autofocus Performance
The autofocus performance of the Canon RF75-300mm is noteworthy, particularly with its Servo AF capabilities that ensure sharp focus on moving subjects. However, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR boasts an autofocus speed of just 0.08 seconds, making it incredibly fast and nearly silent. This difference in autofocus technology can be critical for photographers who need quick and responsive performance, especially in dynamic shooting environments.
Versatility and Usage
The Canon RF75-300mm is highly versatile, offering a range of focal lengths that can dramatically change the feel of a photo. It is particularly suited for wildlife and sports photography, where capturing subjects at a distance is essential. On the other hand, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is ideal for street photography and portraits, with a focal length equivalent of 53mm in 35mm format, which is often considered perfect for these styles. The choice between versatility and specialized use is clear in this comparison.
Price Comparison
The Canon RF75-300mm is priced at $239.00, making it about 47% cheaper than the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR, which retails for $449.00. This significant price difference may appeal to budget-conscious photographers or those just starting in photography. While the Canon lens offers great value, the Fujinon lens justifies its higher price with superior image quality and performance features, particularly for specific applications.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF75-300mm F4-5.6 Zoom Lens and the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR ultimately depends on your photography needs. If you are looking for a budget-friendly, versatile lens that can handle a variety of shooting situations, the Canon RF75-300mm is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize image quality, fast autofocus, and weather resistance, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR may be worth the investment despite its higher price.

