Canon RF75- vs Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF75- wins on zoom range and focal length, Nikon NIKKOR Z 24- wins on price and weight.
The Canon RF75-300mm is a budget-friendly option for those needing portability and a long zoom range, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm offers superior versatility and build quality for serious photographers.
Why Canon RF75- is better
Price
Canon is significantly cheaper at $239.
Portability
Canon is compact and lightweight.
Included Accessories
Canon comes with a cleaning kit and UV filter.
Why Nikon NIKKOR Z 24- is better
Aperture
Nikon has a constant f/4 aperture.
Versatility
Nikon covers a wider focal length range.
Build Quality
Nikon features weather sealing and premium optics.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF75- | Nikon NIKKOR Z 24- |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus | Eye Detection AF | Dual STM Motors |
| Close Focus | Not specified | 1.15 ft |
| Camera Type | Canon EOS R | Nikon Z |
| Included Items | Lens Cap, Filter | None |
| Weather Sealing | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF75-300mm and Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm
The Canon RF75-300mm F4-5.6 Zoom Lens is priced at $239.00, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S comes in at $1,096.95. This makes the Canon lens about 78% cheaper than the Nikon model. Each lens serves different purposes, appealing to distinct types of photographers. The Canon lens is designed for those seeking portability and a long focal range, while the Nikon lens offers a versatile zoom range with a constant aperture.
Target Audience and Compatibility
The Canon RF75-300mm is specifically crafted for Canon EOS R series cameras, making it a great choice for Canon users looking to expand their lens options. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm is compatible with both FX and DX format Nikon Z series mirrorless cameras, enabling it to cater to a broader audience. This lens can serve well for both amateur and professional photographers, providing flexibility in terms of camera compatibility.
Focal Length and Zoom Range
The Canon RF75-300mm offers an impressive zoom range of 75mm to 300mm, allowing photographers to capture subjects from a distance, which is ideal for wildlife or sports photography. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm, on the other hand, provides a zoom range from 24mm to 120mm. This makes it more versatile for landscape and portrait photography, covering a wider range of shooting scenarios. The focal lengths of both lenses cater to different styles of photography, and understanding these differences can help buyers make informed choices.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
The Canon RF75-300mm has a variable aperture of F4-5.6, which limits its performance in low-light conditions compared to the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm, which features a constant f/4 aperture throughout its zoom range. This means that the Nikon lens will maintain consistent exposure settings and better low-light performance across various focal lengths. For photographers who frequently shoot in dimly lit environments or indoors, the Nikon lens may provide an advantage.
Autofocus Capabilities
Both lenses offer advanced autofocus capabilities, but they operate differently. The Canon RF75-300mm includes features like Eye Detection AF, allowing it to focus on subjects’ pupils even at maximum zoom. This capability is particularly useful for portrait photographers. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm employs dual high-speed, ultra-quiet STM stepping motors for its autofocus, ensuring close focusing and edge-to-edge sharpness. While both lenses excel in autofocus performance, their specific features cater to different types of photography.
Build Quality and Accessories
The Canon RF75-300mm is designed to be compact, lightweight, and portable, making it easy to carry around without feeling burdensome. It also comes with a UV filter, lens cap keeper, and a cleaning kit, adding value to the purchase. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm is notably more robust, featuring weather sealing and premium S-Line optics. This makes it suitable for outdoor photography in varied conditions. While both lenses come with unique advantages, the choice between portability and build quality will depend on individual preferences.
Price and Value Proposition
The Canon RF75-300mm is priced at $239.00, making it a budget-friendly option for those who want a long zoom lens without breaking the bank. In comparison, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm is priced at $1,096.95, which is significantly more expensive. This price difference reflects the Nikon lens's advanced features, build quality, and versatility. While the Canon lens offers excellent value for its price, the Nikon lens offers enhanced capabilities that may justify its higher cost for serious photographers.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF75-300mm and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm ultimately depends on your specific photography needs and budget. If you're looking for a lightweight, budget-friendly lens for wildlife or sports photography, the Canon RF75-300mm is a solid choice. However, if you require a versatile, high-quality lens for various shooting scenarios, and are willing to invest more money, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm would serve you better. Consider your camera compatibility, photographic style, and budget before making a decision.

