Canon RF75- vs Viltrox
Updated July 2026 — Canon RF75- wins on zoom and autofocus, Viltrox wins on aperture and weight.
The Canon RF75-300mm lens offers superior versatility and zoom capabilities, while the Viltrox 35mm lens excels in low-light performance and portability.
Why Canon RF75- is better
Zoom Range
Canon offers a versatile 75mm to 300mm zoom.
Autofocus
Canon features advanced eye detection autofocus.
Compatibility
Canon is designed for EOS R series cameras.
Why Viltrox is better
Price
Viltrox is more budget-friendly at $179.
Weight
Viltrox is lighter at 170g.
Aperture
Viltrox has a wider f/1.7 aperture.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Canon RF75- | Viltrox |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 75-300mm | 35mm |
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/1.7 |
| Weight | Approx. 300g | 170g |
| Autofocus | Yes, Eye Detection | Yes, Near-Silent |
| Camera Mount | Canon RF | Sony E |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Canon RF75-300mm and Viltrox 35mm
The Canon RF75-300mm F4-5.6 Zoom Lens offers versatility with a broad zoom range, while the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E emphasizes a prime lens designed for low-light conditions and portrait photography. Both lenses cater to different photography needs, making them suitable for distinct shooting scenarios.
The Canon RF75-300mm lens is priced at $239.00, providing a compact option that reaches up to 300mm, ideal for capturing distant subjects. In contrast, the Viltrox 35mm lens is more budget-friendly at $179.00, making it about 25% cheaper. This price difference highlights the Viltrox as a more accessible option for those who may not require the extensive zoom capabilities of the Canon lens.
Design and Build Quality
When comparing the design and build quality, the Canon RF75-300mm lens is compact and lightweight, weighing about as much as a 500ml water bottle. This makes it portable and convenient for photographers on the go. Additionally, it includes a UV filter, lens cap keeper, and a cleaning kit, which adds value to the purchase.
On the other hand, the Viltrox 35mm lens weighs only 170g, making it exceptionally lightweight and easy to carry, especially for travel. Its design is tailored for APS-C-format E-mount mirrorless cameras, ensuring a seamless fit for users of those systems. While both lenses are designed with portability in mind, the Viltrox slightly edges out with its minimal weight, appealing to photographers who prioritize mobility.
Focal Length and Versatility
The Canon RF75-300mm lens shines in terms of focal length versatility. With an impressive range from 75mm to 300mm, it allows photographers to capture a variety of subjects, from close-ups to distant wildlife shots. This zoom capability makes it suitable for events, sports, and nature photography where flexibility is essential.
In contrast, the Viltrox 35mm lens offers a fixed focal length that translates to a 35mm equivalent, making it ideal for portraiture and street photography. While it excels in specific scenarios, it lacks the versatility that the zoom range of the Canon provides. Thus, if your photography demands varied focal lengths, the Canon RF75-300mm lens will be the better choice.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
The Viltrox 35mm lens has a bright f/1.7 maximum aperture, allowing it to perform exceptionally well in low-light conditions. This wide aperture provides greater control over depth of field, making it particularly advantageous for portrait photographers aiming for a blurred background effect.
In contrast, the Canon RF75-300mm lens has a maximum aperture ranging from f/4 to f/5.6, which is less ideal for low-light environments. While it may still perform adequately during daylight hours, the Viltrox's wider aperture gives it a significant edge for nighttime or indoor photography. If low-light performance is a critical factor for your work, the Viltrox 35mm is the clear winner.
Autofocus and Shooting Experience
Both lenses feature autofocus capabilities, but they cater to different shooting experiences. The Canon RF75-300mm lens incorporates advanced autofocus technologies, including eye detection, which is particularly beneficial for capturing moving subjects. This feature enhances the shooting experience during events or wildlife photography, where keeping focus on the subject’s eyes can be challenging.
The Viltrox 35mm lens also boasts near-silent autofocus, which is beneficial for video work or candid photography. This feature allows for more natural shooting experiences without distracting noise. While both lenses offer strong autofocus systems, the specific needs of the photographer will determine which is more suitable. For dynamic and fast-paced environments, the Canon's eye detection may provide a significant advantage.
Compatibility and Use Cases
The Canon RF75-300mm lens is specifically designed for Canon EOS R series cameras, including models like R100, R50, and R6. This limitation means that users of Canon DSLR cameras will be unable to use this lens, which could restrict its audience.
Conversely, the Viltrox 35mm lens is compatible with a range of Sony E-mount mirrorless cameras, including the popular a6000 series and a7 series. This broader compatibility allows it to cater to a larger segment of photographers using Sony’s mirrorless systems. Therefore, if compatibility with your existing camera is a priority, the Viltrox 35mm lens may be the more practical option.
Price and Value Proposition
The Canon RF75-300mm lens is priced at $239.00, while the Viltrox 35mm lens is available for $179.00. This price difference of about $60 illustrates that the Viltrox lens offers a more budget-friendly option without compromising on essential features such as low-light performance and portability.
Given that the Viltrox 35mm lens is about 25% cheaper, it could be regarded as a better value for photographers looking for a high-quality lens at a lower price point. However, those who require the versatility of a zoom lens may find the extra investment in the Canon RF75-300mm justifiable for their specific needs.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Canon RF75-300mm F4-5.6 Zoom Lens and the Viltrox 35mm F1.7 E depends on your specific photography needs. If versatility and a broad focal length range are essential for your work, the Canon lens is the superior choice. However, if you prioritize low-light performance, portability, and a more budget-friendly option, the Viltrox lens stands out as an excellent alternative. Ultimately, both lenses offer unique advantages that cater to different types of photography, so consider your individual requirements when making a decision.

