Concept2 Model D Upgraded New Rowing Machine vs JOROTO Water Rowing Machines for Home, Foldable
Updated August 2026 — Concept2 Model D Upgraded New Rowing Machine wins on technology and design, JOROTO Water Rowing Machines for Home, Foldable wins on storage.
The Concept2 Model D offers advanced technology and build quality, while the JOROTO Water Rowing Machine provides a budget-friendly option with a realistic rowing experience.
Why Concept2 Model D Upgraded New Rowing Machine is better
Advanced Technology
PM5 monitor provides detailed workout data.
Build Quality
Robust construction designed for heavy use.
User Comfort
Two height options for the seat.
Why JOROTO Water Rowing Machines for Home, Foldable is better
Price
Significantly cheaper at $429.99.
Aesthetic Appeal
Solid wood frame adds aesthetic value.
Space Saving
180° foldable design saves space.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Concept2 Model D Upgraded New Rowing Machine | JOROTO Water Rowing Machines for Home, Foldable |
|---|---|---|
| Monitor | PM5 Performance Monitor | Bluetooth Monitor |
| Resistance Type | Air | Water |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | No | Yes |
| Assembly | Requires Assembly | 90% Pre-assembled |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Concept2 Model D is priced at $1,399.00, while the JOROTO Water Rowing Machine is significantly cheaper at $429.99, making it about 69% less expensive. For budget-conscious buyers, this difference is substantial, especially for those who are just starting their rowing journey or looking for a reliable machine without breaking the bank. The Concept2, however, may be justified in its higher price due to its advanced features and brand reputation. In contrast, the JOROTO offers a more accessible entry point for home fitness enthusiasts.
Design and Build Quality
In terms of design, the JOROTO Water Rowing Machine features a solid wood frame made from FSC-certified oak, which not only contributes to its durability but also adds an aesthetic appeal to home gyms. The Concept2 Model D, while not specified in materials, is known for its robust construction designed for heavy use. Each machine is built to accommodate different user needs, with the JOROTO supporting a weight capacity of up to 400 lbs, which is an impressive feature for larger users. The Concept2’s design allows for easy mobility and compact storage, making it suitable for various living spaces.
Technology and Monitoring
Technology-wise, the Concept2 Model D boasts the PM5 Performance Monitor, which provides detailed workout data including pace, watts, and stroke rate. It connects via Bluetooth to various apps, enhancing the rowing experience with virtual coaching and performance tracking. On the other hand, the JOROTO Water Rowing Machine also features a Bluetooth-enabled monitor that connects with the JOROTO app, providing guided workouts and performance tracking. Although both machines utilize technology to enhance user experience, the PM5 offers a broader range of data and more established compatibility with third-party applications, positioning it as a more advanced option.
Workout Experience
The rowing experience differs notably between the two machines. The Concept2 Model D uses air resistance, allowing users to control their exertion and resistance effectively. This feature leads to a smooth and consistent rowing feel, which is ideal for serious athletes. Conversely, the JOROTO employs a water resistance system that mimics the sensation of rowing on water, providing a soothing sound and a more immersive experience. This can be particularly appealing for those who prioritize a realistic rowing feel over the technical aspects of workout data.
Storage and Mobility
When it comes to storage and mobility, the Concept2 Model D is designed to be easily separable into two pieces for compact storage, which is a significant advantage for users with limited space. It also features wheels for easy transport. In comparison, the JOROTO Water Rowing Machine has a 180° foldable design that saves up to 60% of space, making it even more compact when stored upright. This foldable feature is particularly beneficial for home users who need to maximize their living area without sacrificing workout equipment.
User Comfort
User comfort is a crucial aspect of any workout machine. The Concept2 Model D offers two height options for the seat, 14" and 20", catering to users of varying heights and making it easier to get on and off. Meanwhile, the JOROTO Water Rowing Machine features an ergonomic design that ensures a comfortable glide, allowing for longer workout sessions without discomfort. Both machines prioritize user experience, but the availability of different seat heights in the Concept2 may provide a slight edge for users looking for personalization in their workout setup.
Brand Reputation and Support
Brand reputation plays a significant role in purchasing decisions. Concept2 is well-known in the fitness community for its high-quality rowing machines, often praised for their durability and performance. The Concept2 Model D ranks at 151,144 on sales, reflecting its popularity among serious rowers. JOROTO, while a reputable brand in its own right, does not have the same level of recognition but offers a solid product backed by a commitment to customer service. The JOROTO Water Rowing Machine ranks at 152,446, indicating a competitive standing in the market.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the choice between the Concept2 Model D and the JOROTO Water Rowing Machine ultimately depends on individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize advanced technology, detailed workout data, and robust build quality, the Concept2 Model D is the better option despite its higher price. However, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly machine that offers a realistic rowing experience and solid construction, the JOROTO Water Rowing Machine stands out as an excellent choice. Consider your fitness goals, space availability, and budget when making your decision to find the rowing machine that best fits your lifestyle.

