COOBST U-Shaped Electric Toothbrush for Adults, vs FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening
Updated August 2026 — COOBST U-Shaped Electric Toothbrush for Adults, wins on vibration and cleaning modes, FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening wins on charging.
The COOBST toothbrush offers more cleaning modes and a lower price, while the FULYA excels in charging convenience and user-friendliness.
Why COOBST U-Shaped Electric Toothbrush for Adults, is better
Price
COOBST is $2.19 cheaper than FULYA.
Cleaning Modes
COOBST has 4 modes compared to FULYA's 3.
Vibration
COOBST achieves 48,000 vibrations per minute.
Why FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening is better
Charging
FULYA charges in 3 hours and lasts a week.
Ease of Use
FULYA has a simple one-button operation.
Sales Rank
FULYA has a better sales rank at 110,906.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | COOBST U-Shaped Electric Toothbrush for Adults, | FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | COOBST | FULYA |
| Design | U-Shaped | U-Shaped |
| Cleaning Time | 60 seconds | 45 seconds |
| Material | Food-grade | Food-grade |
| Waterproof Rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The COOBST U-Shaped Electric Toothbrush is priced at $22.40, making it about 17% cheaper than the FULYA Automatic Toothbrush, which costs $24.59. This price difference may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious buyers. Both products, while similarly priced, offer different features that might justify their respective costs. The COOBST toothbrush has an average price of $27.04 over the past 90 days, which suggests it could be a better deal during certain sales or discounts. On the other hand, the FULYA toothbrush has an average price of $29.48 in the same timeframe, indicating it may not be as frequently discounted.
Design and Usability
In terms of design, both products feature a unique U-shaped brush head that aims to provide comprehensive cleaning. The COOBST toothbrush emphasizes ergonomics with its ability to wrap around each tooth for complete 360° cleaning coverage, tailored to the natural shape of adult teeth. The FULYA toothbrush also promotes an ergonomic design but focuses on a one-button operation for ease of use, allowing users to switch between three cleaning modes effortlessly. Both designs cater to a smooth user experience, but the COOBST product has a slight edge in coverage and comfort.
Cleaning Modes and Technology
The COOBST U-Shaped Electric Toothbrush offers four distinct cleaning modes: Standard Clean, Pro Clean, Whitening Clean, and Rhythmic Massage, allowing users to customize their brushing experience based on specific needs. The toothbrush leverages ultrasonic technology, achieving up to 48,000 vibrations per minute for effective cleaning. In comparison, the FULYA toothbrush features three modes: Strong, Medium, and Massage, with a focus on comfortable cleaning. While both utilize advanced sonic technology, COOBST provides more versatility in its cleaning options.
Battery Life and Charging
The FULYA toothbrush has a notable advantage in battery life and charging convenience, requiring only three hours for a full charge, which allows for up to one week of use on a single charge. In contrast, the COOBST toothbrush does not specify its charging time or battery duration, which may affect user experience for those who travel frequently. The convenience of wireless charging with the FULYA toothbrush makes it a practical choice for users who value portability and ease of use.
Waterproof Rating
Both electric toothbrushes boast an IPX7 waterproof rating, ensuring that they are safe to use in the shower or for easy cleaning under running water. This feature is crucial for maintaining hygiene and ease of maintenance for both models. However, the COOBST toothbrush highlights its fully sealed design, which protects internal components from water damage, while the FULYA toothbrush notes that its charging dock is not waterproof, which could be a consideration for users who prefer to use their toothbrush in wet environments.
Sales Rankings
The FULYA Automatic Toothbrush has a sales rank of 110,906, which indicates a relatively better popularity compared to the COOBST toothbrush, which holds a sales rank of 234,492. This could suggest that users might be more inclined to purchase the FULYA model based on its performance and reputation in the market. However, sales rankings can fluctuate based on various factors, including promotional activities and product availability, so this metric should be considered alongside other features and user preferences.
Customer Experience
The COOBST toothbrush focuses on a detailed cleaning experience with its multiple modes and advanced vibration technology, promising thorough cleaning in just 60 seconds. In contrast, the FULYA toothbrush emphasizes a quick 360° cleaning in 45 seconds, which might appeal to users seeking efficiency in their morning routine. Both products are geared towards enhancing dental hygiene, but the COOBST toothbrush might be more suited for those looking for a deeper clean while the FULYA offers a balance of speed and effectiveness.
Which should you buy?
When deciding between the COOBST U-Shaped Electric Toothbrush and the FULYA Automatic Toothbrush, consider your specific oral care needs and preferences. If you prioritize a lower price and more versatile cleaning modes, the COOBST toothbrush may meet your requirements well. However, if you value quick charging and user-friendly operation, the FULYA toothbrush could be the better option. Ultimately, both toothbrushes provide effective cleaning solutions, but the best choice will depend on individual preferences regarding design, functionality, and price.

