vsversusfinder

CURTIS Mountain Dew MIS134MD, Mini Portable vs Midea MERM17B0ASL 1.7 Cu Ft Mini Fridge, Compact

Updated July 2026 — CURTIS Mountain Dew MIS134MD, Mini Portable wins on capacity, Midea MERM17B0ASL 1.7 Cu Ft Mini Fridge, Compact wins on price and weight.

The CURTIS Mountain Dew is a budget-friendly option ideal for personal use, while the Midea MERM17B0ASL offers more storage and versatility for a higher price.

Why CURTIS Mountain Dew MIS134MD, Mini Portable is better

Price

CURTIS is significantly cheaper at $24.38.

Design

Unique Mountain Dew branding adds fun.

Noise

Whisper-quiet operation is ideal for small spaces.

Why Midea MERM17B0ASL 1.7 Cu Ft Mini Fridge, Compact is better

Capacity

Midea has a larger 1.7 cu ft capacity.

Energy Efficiency

Midea is ENERGY STAR certified.

Versatility

Midea features adjustable thermostat and reversible door.

Overall score

CURTIS Mountain Dew MIS134MD, Mini Portable
65
Midea MERM17B0ASL 1.7 Cu Ft Mini Fridge, Compact
85

Specifications

SpecCURTIS Mountain Dew MIS134MD, Mini PortableMidea MERM17B0ASL 1.7 Cu Ft Mini Fridge, Compact
Cooling TypeThermoelectricCompressor
Door TypeStandardReversible
DesignCompactSleek
Energy UseLowEfficient
Power Options12V & ACAC Only

Dimension comparison

CURTIS Mountain Dew MIS134MD, Mini PortableMidea MERM17B0ASL 1.7 Cu Ft Mini Fridge, Compact

Price Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the CURTIS Mountain Dew is significantly cheaper at $24.38 compared to the Midea MERM17B0ASL, which is priced at $119.98. This means the CURTIS fridge is about 80% less expensive, making it an appealing option for those on a budget. The low price of the CURTIS model may attract consumers looking for a compact solution for personal use without the commitment of a larger investment. In contrast, the higher price of the Midea fridge reflects its larger capacity and additional features, positioning it more as a versatile appliance suitable for a variety of settings.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, the CURTIS Mountain Dew stands out with its unique Mountain Dew branding and classic green color, adding a fun personality to any space. The compact nature of this fridge not only makes it visually appealing but also practical for personal spaces like bedrooms or offices. On the other hand, the Midea MERM17B0ASL features a sleek steel gray finish, which is more understated and can blend seamlessly into any environment. While the CURTIS model is designed to be a conversation starter, the Midea offers a more versatile aesthetic that caters to those who prefer a more traditional look.

Size and Capacity

The CURTIS Mountain Dew has a 4-liter capacity, which is specifically designed to chill six 12 oz cans, making it a compact solution ideal for personal use. In contrast, the Midea MERM17B0ASL has a larger capacity of 1.7 cubic feet, allowing for more extensive storage options including snacks, beverages, and fresh food. This increased capacity means that it can accommodate larger items such as a 2-liter bottle, which is an attractive feature for users needing more versatility in their storage. Thus, if you require more space for multiple items, the Midea is a better choice.

Cooling Efficiency

The CURTIS Mountain Dew uses a thermoelectric cooling system that can chill beverages up to 32°F below ambient temperature, ensuring your drinks stay refreshingly cold. This feature is particularly suitable for personal use, especially during travel or while at home. Conversely, while the Midea MERM17B0ASL does not specify the exact cooling temperature, it is ENERGY STAR certified, which suggests that it operates efficiently without excessive power consumption. This certification may be particularly appealing for those looking for a reliable fridge that balances performance with energy savings.

Noise Levels

The CURTIS Mountain Dew is designed with a whisper-quiet motor that minimizes noise disruption, making it suitable for environments where silence is essential, such as bedrooms or offices. This quiet operation is a significant advantage for users who are sensitive to noise. In comparison, the Midea MERM17B0ASL also boasts low noise levels, but specific decibel ratings are not provided. However, both models are designed to ensure that their operation does not interfere with your daily activities, although the CURTIS may have a slight edge in environments where silence is paramount.

Versatility and Power Options

The CURTIS Mountain Dew offers versatile power options, being able to operate using a 12V car adapter in addition to a standard outlet. This makes it an excellent choice for road trips or outdoor activities. Its ability to double as a cooler for skincare products adds to its versatility. Meanwhile, the Midea MERM17B0ASL features an adjustable thermostat and a reversible door, allowing for customization based on your space and storage needs. While both models provide flexibility, the CURTIS shines in mobile scenarios, whereas the Midea excels in stationary settings with its adaptable features.

Target Audience

The CURTIS Mountain Dew is particularly appealing to individuals looking for a compact, budget-friendly option that serves well for personal use, especially in small spaces or while traveling. Its fun design and lower price make it attractive to younger consumers or those seeking a unique addition to their space. On the other hand, the Midea MERM17B0ASL targets a broader audience, including students in dorms, office workers, and families who need more storage capacity. Its features cater to those looking for efficiency and functionality in a larger format.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the decision between the CURTIS Mountain Dew and the Midea MERM17B0ASL depends on your specific needs. If you are looking for a compact, budget-friendly fridge primarily for personal use, the CURTIS model is a strong contender at $24.38. However, for those who require more storage space and versatility, the Midea model offers a larger capacity and additional features for $119.98. Your choice should reflect whether you prioritize cost and compactness or capacity and functionality.