vsversusfinder

Dell Optical Mouse MS116 vs ProtoArc Bluetooth Wireless Mouse for MacBook

Updated August 2026 — Dell Optical Mouse MS116 wins on price, ProtoArc Bluetooth Wireless Mouse for MacBook wins on battery and connectivity.

The ProtoArc Bluetooth Wireless Mouse offers superior features and versatility compared to the Dell Optical Mouse MS116, making it the better choice for most users.

Why Dell Optical Mouse MS116 is better

Price

Dell is slightly more expensive at $14.99.

Simplicity

Dell offers a straightforward plug-and-play experience.

Reliability

Dell is a trusted brand for basic wired mice.

Why ProtoArc Bluetooth Wireless Mouse for MacBook is better

Portability

ProtoArc is compact and designed for travel.

Connectivity

ProtoArc supports Bluetooth, USB, and Type-C.

Battery Life

ProtoArc has a rechargeable battery lasting up to 15 days.

Overall score

Dell Optical Mouse MS116
65
ProtoArc Bluetooth Wireless Mouse for MacBook
85

Specifications

SpecDell Optical Mouse MS116ProtoArc Bluetooth Wireless Mouse for MacBook
BrandDellProtoArc
Price$14.99$11.99
DPIN/A1000/1600/2400
Battery TypeN/ARechargeable
CompatibilityUSB onlyMultiple OS

Dimension comparison

Dell Optical Mouse MS116ProtoArc Bluetooth Wireless Mouse for MacBook

Design and Aesthetics

When it comes to design, the ProtoArc Bluetooth Wireless Mouse is more compact and portable than the Dell Optical Mouse MS116. The ProtoArc features a slim design that enhances its suitability for travel, whereas the Dell mouse has a more traditional look. The difference in portability is significant, with the ProtoArc being designed for users who frequently switch between devices. The Dell Optical Mouse is a straightforward wired option that plugs directly into a USB port, making it ideal for office use but less versatile for mobile work.

Connectivity Options

The connectivity options differ greatly between the two mice. The ProtoArc Bluetooth Wireless Mouse supports multiple connection types, including Bluetooth, USB, and Type-C, allowing it to connect to up to three devices simultaneously. This versatility is beneficial for users who operate multiple devices, such as a laptop, tablet, and smartphone. In contrast, the Dell Optical Mouse is a wired mouse that exclusively connects through a USB port, limiting its flexibility. This fundamental difference makes the ProtoArc a better choice for users seeking multi-device connectivity.

Battery Life and Charging

When it comes to battery life, the ProtoArc Bluetooth Wireless Mouse has a distinct advantage. It features a built-in Lithium Ion battery that can be recharged via an included cable. After just two hours of charging, it can last up to 15 days of usage and has a standby time of 200 days. The Dell Optical Mouse, being a wired model, doesn’t require charging, but it sacrifices the convenience and portability offered by the rechargeable features of the ProtoArc. Users who prioritize mobility and extended usage without the hassle of changing batteries will find the ProtoArc more appealing.

Performance and Sensitivity

In terms of performance, the ProtoArc Bluetooth Wireless Mouse stands out with adjustable DPI settings of 1000, 1600, and 2400, allowing for precise tracking across various surfaces. This feature is particularly useful for tasks that require high sensitivity, such as graphic design or gaming. The Dell Optical Mouse offers reliable optical LED tracking, but it lacks the customizable DPI options that the ProtoArc provides. For users who require high performance and adaptability, the ProtoArc is the clear winner.

Comfort and Ergonomics

Comfort is another area where the ProtoArc excels. It is designed with an ergonomic shape that supports the hand, making it suitable for long hours of use without discomfort. Additionally, it features quiet clicks, which can be beneficial in shared workspaces or during late-night sessions. While the Dell Optical Mouse is functional and straightforward, it does not offer the same level of ergonomic design, which may lead to discomfort during extended use. Therefore, for users who prioritize comfort, the ProtoArc is the better option.

Compatibility

Compatibility is crucial for any peripheral device, and here the ProtoArc again takes the lead. It is compatible with a wide range of operating systems, including Windows 7/8/10/11, MacOS, and Android. This broad compatibility makes it ideal for users who may switch between different devices and platforms. On the other hand, the Dell Optical Mouse is more limited in its compatibility, primarily designed for users with devices that have USB ports. For those looking for flexibility across various systems, the ProtoArc is the superior choice.

Price Comparison

The price point differs notably between the two products. The Dell Optical Mouse MS116 is priced at $14.99, whereas the ProtoArc Bluetooth Wireless Mouse is available for $11.99, making it about 20% cheaper. This lower price does not compromise its features; in fact, the ProtoArc offers a range of enhanced functionalities, including multiple connectivity options and superior battery life. For budget-conscious consumers, the ProtoArc provides excellent value without sacrificing performance.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Dell Optical Mouse MS116 and the ProtoArc Bluetooth Wireless Mouse ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you prefer a simple, reliable wired mouse for office use, the Dell Optical Mouse is a solid option. However, if you value portability, multi-device connectivity, and advanced features like adjustable DPI and rechargeable battery life, the ProtoArc is the clear winner. Given its lower price and versatile capabilities, the ProtoArc Bluetooth Wireless Mouse offers a compelling package for modern users.