DEWALT 20V MAX 22" Cordless Hedge Trimmer, Bare Tool Only vs Scotts Outdoor Power Tools LSS10272PS 7.5-Volt
Updated July 2026 — DEWALT 20V MAX 22" Cordless Hedge Trimmer, Bare Tool Only wins on power and cutting length, Scotts Outdoor Power Tools LSS10272PS 7.5-Volt wins on price and weight.
The DEWALT hedge trimmer excels in power and performance, making it ideal for heavy-duty tasks, while the Scotts shear is a budget-friendly option for lighter gardening needs.
Why DEWALT 20V MAX 22" Cordless Hedge Trimmer, Bare Tool Only is better
Power
DEWALT can cut branches up to 3/4 inch thick.
Runtime
DEWALT offers up to 78 minutes of runtime.
Cutting Capacity
DEWALT has a 22-inch blade for larger jobs.
Why Scotts Outdoor Power Tools LSS10272PS 7.5-Volt is better
Price
Scotts is about 50% cheaper.
Weight
Scotts is lightweight and portable.
Ease of Use
Scotts has a telescopic handle for comfort.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | DEWALT 20V MAX 22" Cordless Hedge Trimmer, Bare Tool Only | Scotts Outdoor Power Tools LSS10272PS 7.5-Volt |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 20V | 7.2V |
| Blade Length | 22 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Warranty | N/A | 2 years |
| Motor Power | High Output | Standard |
| Compact Design | Yes | No |
Dimension comparison
Overview
The DEWALT 20V MAX 22" Cordless Hedge Trimmer and the Scotts Outdoor Power Tools LSS10272PS 7.5-Volt Lithium-Ion Cordless Grass Shear are both excellent tools for garden maintenance, but they cater to different needs and preferences. The DEWALT hedge trimmer is priced at $151.99, while the Scotts shear is about 50% cheaper at $74.99. Understanding their features and functionalities will help you decide which is better suited for your gardening tasks.
Power and Performance
The DEWALT hedge trimmer offers a powerful motor designed to tackle branches up to 3/4 inch thick and delivers up to 78 minutes of runtime. This robust performance makes it ideal for heavy-duty trimming and maintaining larger hedges. In contrast, the Scotts shear, powered by a 7.2-volt lithium-ion battery, is designed for lighter tasks, providing flexibility for trimming smaller shrubs and grass. While the Scotts shear is easier to handle, it lacks the cutting power of the DEWALT, making it less suitable for more demanding projects.
Design and Usability
The DEWALT hedge trimmer features a compact design that is 39% more compact than traditional models, promoting maneuverability and reducing strain on the arms during use. This ergonomic design is beneficial for longer trimming sessions. On the other hand, the Scotts shear is equipped with a telescopic wheeled extension handle, allowing users to trim without bending over, which can be a significant advantage for those with back issues or limited mobility. Each tool excels in design tailored to their intended use—DEWALT for heavy-duty tasks and Scotts for ease of use.
Cutting Capacity
When it comes to cutting capacity, the DEWALT hedge trimmer shines with its laser-cut, 22-inch hooked tooth blades that ensure clean and fast cuts on thicker branches. This capability is crucial for maintaining larger hedges with ease. In contrast, the Scotts shear features interchangeable blades, including a 6.7-inch hedge blade and a 3.5-inch shear blade. While these blades offer versatility, they do not match the cutting power or blade length of the DEWALT, making it less effective for larger trimming jobs.
Runtime and Charging
The DEWALT hedge trimmer boasts an impressive runtime of up to 78 minutes, allowing users to complete extensive trimming tasks without frequent interruptions. However, the battery and charger are sold separately, meaning additional costs may be incurred. The Scotts shear, while having a shorter runtime due to its smaller battery, comes with a fast charger, ensuring that users can quickly get back to work. For those who prioritize runtime, the DEWALT is a clear winner, but the Scotts offers quick recharging for more straightforward tasks.
Weight and Portability
The DEWALT hedge trimmer is designed for performance, which typically comes with a heavier weight. While the exact weight is not provided, users should expect a more substantial tool due to its powerful motor and larger blade size. The Scotts shear, being lightweight and compact, ensures easy portability and user-friendliness, making it an excellent option for casual gardeners or those needing a tool for quick tasks. For those who prioritize portability, the Scotts shear is the more attractive option.
Warranty and Durability
The DEWALT hedge trimmer is known for its durability and comes with a robust build designed for tough garden tasks, though specific warranty details are not mentioned. In contrast, the Scotts shear includes a 2-year warranty, offering peace of mind for users regarding its longevity. While both brands are reputable, the warranty on the Scotts shear suggests confidence in its durability for light to medium tasks. This factor may influence buyers looking for long-term reliability.
Price Comparison
The price difference between the two tools is significant, with the DEWALT hedge trimmer retailing at $151.99 and the Scotts shear priced at $74.99. This makes the Scotts shear about 50% cheaper. While the DEWALT offers superior power and performance for heavy-duty tasks, the affordability of the Scotts shear makes it an attractive option for casual or infrequent users. Budget-conscious consumers may find the Scotts shear to be a more sensible choice, especially if their trimming needs are less demanding.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the DEWALT 20V MAX 22" Cordless Hedge Trimmer and the Scotts Outdoor Power Tools LSS10272PS 7.5-Volt Lithium-Ion Cordless Grass Shear hinges on your specific gardening needs. If you require a powerful tool for extensive trimming work and are willing to invest in a more expensive option, the DEWALT hedge trimmer is the way to go. However, for those who prioritize ease of use, portability, and a budget-friendly price, the Scotts shear offers excellent value. Assess your gardening tasks and preferences to make the best decision for your outdoor maintenance needs.

