EGO Power+ Pole Saw, Cordless Electric Pole Saw vs Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc,
Updated August 2026 — EGO Power+ Pole Saw, Cordless Electric Pole Saw wins on battery life and power, Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc, wins on weight and vibration.
The EGO Power+ Pole Saw excels in precision and convenience for tree trimming, while the Husqvarna 120 Mark III offers robust power for general wood cutting.
Why EGO Power+ Pole Saw, Cordless Electric Pole Saw is better
Price
EGO is more expensive but offers advanced features.
Cutting Capability
EGO has a specialized design for tree trimming.
Weight
EGO is lighter and more maneuverable.
Why Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc, is better
Power Source
Husqvarna has a powerful gas engine.
Bar Length
Husqvarna's 14-inch bar is better for larger cuts.
Fuel Efficiency
Husqvarna offers better fuel efficiency.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | EGO Power+ Pole Saw, Cordless Electric Pole Saw | Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc, |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Type | Brushless | X-Torq |
| Chain Speed | 20 m/s | N/A |
| Safety Features | Tool-free tensioning | Chain brake |
| Cutting Tasks | Tree trimming | Wood cutting |
| Maintenance | Low | Moderate |
Dimension comparison
Overview
When comparing the EGO Power+ Pole Saw and the Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, it's crucial to note their distinct designs and functionalities tailored for different tasks. The EGO Power+ Pole Saw is priced at $339.00, while the Husqvarna 120 Mark III costs $219.99, making the latter about 35% cheaper. This price difference is indicative of their intended use, with the EGO model focusing on tree trimming and the Husqvarna designed for general wood cutting and pruning.
Power Source
The EGO Power+ Pole Saw is a cordless electric tool powered by a 56V 2.5Ah battery, providing up to 100 cuts per charge. In contrast, the Husqvarna 120 Mark III operates on a gas-powered 38-cc X-Torq engine, which delivers substantial power and torque. Users who prefer the convenience and low maintenance of electric tools may favor the EGO, while those requiring raw cutting power may lean towards the Husqvarna's gas engine.
Cutting Capability
In terms of cutting capability, the EGO Power+ Pole Saw features a 10-inch bar and chain, ideal for tree trimming tasks. Its chain speeds can reach up to 20 m/s, ensuring efficient cuts. On the other hand, the Husqvarna 120 Mark III boasts a 14-inch bar, which is advantageous for larger cuts and heavier wood. This difference in bar length suggests that the Husqvarna may be better suited for heavier-duty tasks, while the EGO excels in precision tree trimming.
Weight and Maneuverability
The EGO Power+ Pole Saw is designed with a telescopic carbon fiber shaft, allowing a reach of up to 13 feet, and up to 17 feet with an additional extension pole. This makes it highly maneuverable for overhead tasks. Conversely, the Husqvarna 120 Mark III, while lightweight for a gas saw, may not offer the same overhead reach, making it less suitable for elevated cutting tasks. The EGO's design allows for ease of use in challenging positions, particularly in shaded or dark environments.
Safety Features
Safety is a critical consideration, and both products incorporate notable features. The Husqvarna 120 Mark III includes an inertia-activated chain brake, enhancing safety during operation. On the other hand, the EGO Power+ Pole Saw has a tool-free chain tensioning system that promotes safer handling by allowing quick adjustments without the need for additional tools. While both tools prioritize user safety, the EGO’s innovative tensioning system may appeal more to those looking for convenience.
Vibration and Comfort
The EGO Power+ Pole Saw is engineered to produce lower vibrations thanks to its high-efficiency brushless motor, which also extends motor life. This reduction in vibration can lead to a more comfortable user experience, especially during extended use. The Husqvarna 120 Mark III employs LowVib technology, which dampens vibrations between the engine and chassis, ensuring a comfortable grip during operation. Both devices aim to reduce user fatigue, but the effectiveness may vary depending on the task and duration of use.
Battery Life and Fuel Efficiency
Battery life is a significant advantage of the EGO Power+ Pole Saw, which can make up to 100 cuts per charge. This feature is particularly appealing for users who prefer electric tools that do not require refueling. In contrast, the Husqvarna 120 Mark III offers enhanced fuel efficiency through its X-Torq engine, which not only provides power but also reduces emissions. Users who prioritize sustainability may find the EGO’s electric design more appealing, while those who need extended operational time without the interruption of battery charging may prefer the Husqvarna.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the EGO Power+ Pole Saw and the Husqvarna 120 Mark III hinges on specific user needs and preferences. The EGO is ideal for those seeking a lightweight, electric pole saw with innovative features like the LED cut line indicator, making it perfect for tree trimming. At $339.00, it appeals to those who prioritize convenience and precision. Conversely, the Husqvarna 120 Mark III, priced at $219.99, offers a powerful gas engine suitable for heavier cutting tasks, making it a better fit for users who need a robust, versatile chainsaw for general wood cutting. Each tool has its strengths, and understanding your needs will guide you to the right purchase.

