vsversusfinder

EGO Power+ Pole Saw, Cordless Electric Pole Saw vs Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc,

Updated August 2026 — EGO Power+ Pole Saw, Cordless Electric Pole Saw leads on battery life and ease of use.

The EGO Power+ Pole Saw offers advanced features and lightweight design, while the Husqvarna 120 Mark III provides powerful performance at a lower price. Choose based on your specific needs.

Why EGO Power+ Pole Saw, Cordless Electric Pole Saw is better

Weight

EGO is up to 30% lighter than competitors.

Battery Life

EGO offers up to 100 cuts per charge.

Maintenance

EGO requires less maintenance than gas models.

Why Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc, is better

Price

Husqvarna is $219.99, making it more affordable.

Cutting Power

Husqvarna has a more powerful gas engine.

Bar Length

Husqvarna features a 16-inch bar for larger cuts.

Overall score

EGO Power+ Pole Saw, Cordless Electric Pole Saw
85
Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc,
75

Specifications

SpecEGO Power+ Pole Saw, Cordless Electric Pole SawHusqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc,
Motor TypeBrushlessX-Torq
Chain Speed20 m/sN/A
Safety FeaturesTool-free tensioningChain brake
Fuel TypeBatteryGas
Cutting Capability10-inch16-inch

Dimension comparison

EGO Power+ Pole Saw, Cordless Electric Pole SawHusqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc,

Price Comparison

The EGO Power+ Pole Saw is priced at $339.00, while the Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw is more affordable at $219.99. This makes the Husqvarna about 35% cheaper than the EGO model. Price can significantly influence consumer choice, particularly for homeowners seeking effective tools without breaking the bank. While the EGO offers advanced features like a telescopic shaft and LED cut line indicator, the Husqvarna provides a solid, reliable performance with its gas-powered engine at a lower price point.

Power and Performance

In terms of power, the Husqvarna 120 Mark III features a 38-cc X-Torq engine, which is designed to deliver great power and torque for efficient wood cutting and tree pruning. On the other hand, the EGO Power+ Pole Saw utilizes a high-efficiency brushless motor, producing smooth cuts with chain speeds up to 20 m/s. Although the EGO's electric motor provides quieter operation and zero emissions, the Husqvarna's gas engine excels in raw cutting power, making it better suited for heavier tasks.

Cutting Capability

The cutting capabilities differ between the two products, with the EGO Power+ featuring a 10-inch bar and chain, while the Husqvarna has a more extensive 16-inch bar. The larger bar on the Husqvarna allows it to tackle bigger limbs and trees more efficiently. However, the EGO's 10-inch bar is designed for precision and can make up to 100 cuts per charge with its 56V 2.5Ah battery, making it ideal for lighter jobs and extended use in areas where electric tools are more practical.

Weight and Maneuverability

Maneuverability is an important factor for users who may need to operate these tools for extended periods. The EGO Power+ Pole Saw is noted to be up to 30% lighter than other pole saws in its category, enhancing its ease of use, especially when reaching high branches. Conversely, while the Husqvarna 120 Mark III is designed for comfort with LowVib technology to reduce vibrations, it does not emphasize weight reduction to the extent of the EGO. Users may find the EGO is simpler to handle for prolonged tree trimming tasks without fatigue.

Battery and Fuel Efficiency

Battery life and fuel efficiency are crucial considerations for any chainsaw. The EGO Power+ offers up to 100 cuts per charge with the included battery, making it a reliable choice for users who prefer cordless operation. It also features compatibility with all EGO 56V ARC Lithium batteries, allowing for versatility and extended runtime. In contrast, the Husqvarna 120 Mark III relies on gas, which can be less convenient as it requires refueling. However, the X-Torq engine enhances fuel efficiency and reduces emissions, appealing to eco-conscious users.

Safety Features

Safety is paramount in any power tool, and both products incorporate important safety features. The Husqvarna 120 Mark III is equipped with an inertia-activated chain brake, which provides an extra layer of safety during operation. In contrast, the EGO Power+ Pole Saw includes a tool-free chain tensioning system, allowing for quick adjustments and minimizing the risk of accidents due to improper chain tension. While both tools prioritize user safety, the Husqvarna's automatic chain brake may provide added peace of mind for those concerned about unexpected chain movement.

Maintenance and Care

Maintenance requirements differ significantly between the two models. The EGO Power+ Pole Saw, being electric, requires less maintenance overall—no need for gas, oil changes, or spark plug replacements. Users can focus on keeping the chain sharp and properly tensioned. The Husqvarna 120 Mark III, however, involves more regular maintenance due to its gas engine, including oil checks and air filter cleaning, which can deter some users seeking lower upkeep. The EGO’s user-friendly maintenance needs may appeal to those who prefer a hassle-free experience.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the EGO Power+ Pole Saw and the Husqvarna 120 Mark III boils down to individual needs and preferences. If you’re looking for an electric tool that is lightweight, easy to use, and requires minimal maintenance, the EGO Power+ is a compelling choice, albeit at a higher price of $339.00. However, if you require a powerful gas chainsaw for larger jobs and prefer a more economical option at $219.99, the Husqvarna 120 Mark III may be the better fit. Each tool offers distinct advantages, making it essential to consider your specific cutting needs and preferences before making a decision.