Electro-Voice ND44 Dynamic Tight Cardioid vs Shure BETA 56A Snare and Tom Microphone -
Updated August 2026 — Shure BETA 56A Snare and Tom Microphone - leads on flexibility and isolation.
The Electro-Voice ND44 offers solid performance at a lower price, while the Shure BETA 56A provides superior noise handling and flexibility.
Why Electro-Voice ND44 Dynamic Tight Cardioid is better
Price
ND44 is $50 cheaper
Durability
Memraflex grille resists denting
Isolation
Humbucking coil guards against line hum
Why Shure BETA 56A Snare and Tom Microphone - is better
Noise Handling
Advanced pneumatic shock mount system
Flexibility
Swivel-mount design for positioning
Sound Quality
Tailored frequency response for drums
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Electro-Voice ND44 Dynamic Tight Cardioid | Shure BETA 56A Snare and Tom Microphone - |
|---|---|---|
| Polar Pattern | Cardioid | Supercardioid |
| Frequency Response | 50-16,000 Hz | 50-16,000 Hz |
| Grille Material | Memraflex | Steel Mesh |
| Shock Mount | No | Yes |
| Sales Rank | 39655 | 32479 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Electro-Voice ND44 and Shure BETA 56A
The Electro-Voice ND44 is priced at $120.00, while the Shure BETA 56A costs $170.00, making the ND44 about 29% cheaper. Each microphone is designed for specific applications, with the ND44 aimed at capturing the aggressive sounds of drums and rhythm instruments, while the BETA 56A is tailored for close miking of snare drums and toms with its supercardioid pattern.
Design and Build Quality
The build quality of both microphones reflects their intended use in demanding performance environments. The Electro-Voice ND44 features a durable Memraflex grille, which resists denting and is built to withstand rough treatment. In contrast, the Shure BETA 56A is equipped with a hardened steel mesh grille that also resists wear and abuse, ensuring longevity. Both microphones have compact designs, but the BETA 56A offers a swivel-mount feature that allows for enhanced flexibility in positioning, which can be crucial for live performances.
Sound Performance
When it comes to sound performance, the Electro-Voice ND44 is designed with a tight cardioid polar pattern, providing excellent isolation from surrounding instruments. This makes it particularly effective in live settings where multiple sound sources may be present. The Shure BETA 56A boasts a supercardioid pattern, which also excels in rejecting off-axis sound while providing high gain before feedback. Both microphones deliver quality sound tailored for drums and amplified instruments, but the BETA 56A may offer slightly higher fidelity in studio settings due to its tailored frequency response.
Microphone Placement and Flexibility
Placement flexibility is a critical factor for performance microphones. The Electro-Voice ND44 includes a rotating low-profile head and a drum rim clamp, facilitating easy placement on various parts of the drum set. Meanwhile, the Shure BETA 56A features an integrated dynamic locking stand adapter, simplifying setup and ensuring the microphone stays securely in place even during vigorous performances. This locking mechanism can be particularly advantageous in a live setting, where movement and vibrations are common.
Isolation and Noise Handling
Both microphones are designed to handle noise effectively, but they approach it differently. The Electro-Voice ND44 includes a humbucking coil that guards against line hum, making it a reliable choice near speaker cabinets and other sources of electromagnetic interference. On the other hand, the Shure BETA 56A incorporates an advanced pneumatic shock mount system that minimizes the transmission of mechanical noise and vibrations. This feature can prove beneficial when capturing the intricate sounds of percussion instruments, where unwanted noise can detract from the overall quality.
Price and Value for Money
The price difference between the two microphones is significant, with the ND44 at $120.00 and the BETA 56A at $170.00. This equates to a $50 difference, making the ND44 a more budget-friendly option without sacrificing performance quality. Given that the ND44 has a bestseller rank of 39,655, it indicates a solid reputation among users, suggesting that it offers good value for money. In contrast, the BETA 56A, with a slightly better rank of 32,479, may justify its higher price through its additional features and sound quality.
Brand Reputation and Reliability
Both Electro-Voice and Shure are well-respected brands in the audio equipment industry, known for their reliability and quality. Shure has a long-standing reputation for producing microphones that are robust and dependable, often favored in professional settings. Electro-Voice, while also reputable, is particularly renowned for its innovative designs that cater to musicians. The choice between these brands may come down to personal preference and specific use cases.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Electro-Voice ND44 and the Shure BETA 56A ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a more economical option that still delivers solid performance for drums and rhythm instruments, the ND44 is the clear winner at $120.00. However, if you prefer a microphone with superior noise handling and placement flexibility, and are willing to invest an additional $50, the Shure BETA 56A may be the better choice for close miking in live settings. Each microphone has its strengths, so consider your specific application when making your decision.

