Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal vs Shure PGA56 Dynamic Microphone
Updated August 2026 — Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal leads on isolation and sound quality.
The Electro-Voice ND86 excels in vocal performance and versatility, while the Shure PGA56 is a cost-effective choice for drummers.
Why Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal is better
Price
ND86 offers more features for the price
Sound
ND86 provides superior vocal clarity
Versatility
ND86 suitable for various applications
Why Shure PGA56 Dynamic Microphone is better
Cost
PGA56 is significantly cheaper
Design
PGA56 has a quick-release swivel mount
Target Use
PGA56 is optimized for snare and toms
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal | Shure PGA56 Dynamic Microphone |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Pattern | Supercardioid | Cardioid |
| Usage | Vocals | Drums |
| Durability | High | Medium |
| Isolation | Excellent | Good |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Electro-Voice ND86 is priced at $144.00, while the Shure PGA56 is significantly cheaper at $90.00, making it about 37% less expensive. This substantial price difference may influence buyers, particularly those on a budget or needing multiple microphones for live performances or recording sessions. The ND86's higher price reflects its robust design and features aimed at professional vocal performance in large venues. In contrast, the PGA56 offers a cost-effective solution for close-mic applications, particularly for drums and percussion.
Build Quality
When it comes to build quality, both microphones are designed with durability in mind, but they cater to different usage scenarios. The Electro-Voice ND86 boasts a tight-mesh Memraflex grille that resists denting and can withstand rough handling, making it well-suited for vocalists performing in large venues. On the other hand, the Shure PGA56 is tailored for snare and tom applications, featuring a sturdy design and a swivel joint that allows for easy positioning. Its industrial design with a black metallic finish provides an unobtrusive look that fits well in any setup, but it may not offer the same level of ruggedness as the ND86 in more demanding environments.
Sound Quality
Sound quality is a pivotal factor in microphone selection, and both the ND86 and PGA56 excel in their respective applications. The Electro-Voice ND86 is equipped with a large-diaphragm dynamic capsule that delivers a rich and detailed frequency response, making it ideal for vocal performances. It is designed for excellent acoustic control, ensuring that vocals remain present and smooth even in noisy environments. In contrast, the Shure PGA56 is specifically tailored for snare and tom sounds, with a cardioid polar pattern that captures the audio source while rejecting unwanted noise. This design is crucial for drummers who need clarity in their recordings without bleed from other instruments.
Versatility
In terms of versatility, the Electro-Voice ND86 shines with its ability to be used in various large-scale vocal applications, making it suitable for concerts, studios, and public speaking events. It features a supercardioid pick-up pattern that offers superior isolation from background noise, enhancing its adaptability. Conversely, the Shure PGA56 is purpose-built for snare and tom applications, featuring a swivel mount that allows for quick and flexible positioning, making it ideal for drummers. While the PGA56 excels in its niche, the ND86's broader application range gives it an edge in versatility.
Frequency Response
The ND86 offers a precisely tuned frequency response that ensures smooth and detailed sound reproduction, important for vocalists who require clarity and presence. This feature is particularly beneficial in live settings where vocalists need to cut through the mix. The Shure PGA56, while designed for capturing the sound of drums, provides clear reproduction as well, but it lacks the extensive frequency tuning found in the ND86. This difference in frequency response tuning can be a deciding factor for those prioritizing vocal performance over drum sound capture.
Market Position
In the market, the Electro-Voice ND86 has a sales rank of 44,080, indicating a solid presence among professional vocal microphones. The Shure PGA56, however, holds a better position with a sales rank of 24,055, suggesting it is a preferred choice among those seeking dynamic microphones for close-mic applications in drumming. This difference in bestseller rankings reflects the specific audiences each microphone attracts, with the PGA56 appealing more to percussionists and the ND86 catering to vocalists.
Use Cases
The intended use cases for both microphones highlight their strengths. The Electro-Voice ND86 is ideal for vocalists performing in large venues, where its sound isolation and acoustic control capabilities shine. Its design is optimized for capturing detailed vocal nuances, making it suitable for live performances and studio recordings alike. In contrast, the Shure PGA56 is perfect for drummers looking for a reliable and easy-to-position microphone for snare and toms. Its quick-release swivel mount and cardioid pattern make it a practical choice for live settings and studio environments where drum clarity is essential.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Electro-Voice ND86 and the Shure PGA56 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you're a vocalist performing in larger venues and require a microphone that offers superior sound isolation and detail, the ND86 is worth the investment at $144.00. However, if you're a drummer or looking for a cost-effective microphone for close-mic applications with excellent clarity, the Shure PGA56 at $90.00 is an excellent choice. With the significant price difference and their respective strengths in sound quality and build, each microphone serves its audience well.

