vsversusfinder

Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal vs Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone

Updated August 2026 — Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal wins on price and isolation, Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone wins on sales rank and versatility.

The Electro-Voice ND86 excels in vocal performance and sound isolation, while the Shure PGA57 offers versatility and affordability for various instruments.

Why Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal is better

Sound Quality

ND86 is engineered for exceptional vocal clarity.

Build Quality

ND86 features a durable design for high-energy environments.

Polar Pattern

ND86's supercardioid pattern provides superior isolation.

Why Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone is better

Price

PGA57 is significantly more affordable.

Versatility

PGA57 is suitable for various instruments.

Sales Rank

PGA57 has a higher sales rank indicating popularity.

Overall score

Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal
85
Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone
75

Specifications

SpecElectro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid VocalShure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone
TypeDynamicDynamic
Polar PatternSupercardioidCardioid
Frequency Response50Hz - 18kHz40Hz - 15kHz
Weight0.6 lbs0.5 lbs
ConnectorXLRXLR

Dimension comparison

Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid VocalShure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone

Overview of the Electro-Voice ND86 and Shure PGA57

The Electro-Voice ND86 is designed as a high-performance vocal microphone, while the Shure PGA57 serves as a professional quality instrument microphone. The ND86 is priced at $144.00, making it about 103% more expensive than the PGA57, which is available for $71.00. These differences in price point reflect their distinct target markets and use cases, with the ND86 catering primarily to vocalists in live performance settings and the PGA57 being versatile enough for various instruments.

Design and Build Quality

The build quality of both microphones speaks to their intended use. The Electro-Voice ND86 features a durable design with a tight-mesh Memraflex grille that resists denting, which is essential for vocalists who may be using it in high-energy environments. The ND86 also incorporates a shock-mounted capsule to minimize handling noise, ensuring clarity in recordings. In contrast, the Shure PGA57 boasts an updated industrial design with a black metallic finish, providing an unobtrusive visual presence. The PGA57 is tailored for clarity in sound reproduction and is built to withstand the rigors of live performance, showing that both brands prioritize durability but with different focuses.

Sound Quality

When it comes to sound quality, the Electro-Voice ND86 is engineered for exceptional acoustic control, making it ideal for large venues. It is precisely tuned to deliver smooth, detailed sound while isolating unwanted stage noise effectively. On the other hand, the Shure PGA57 features a tailored microphone cartridge that excels in reproducing sound sources clearly, particularly in amplified instrument and drum settings. While both microphones deliver quality sound, the ND86 is more specialized for vocal performance, whereas the PGA57 offers versatility for various instruments.

Polar Patterns

The polar patterns of these microphones are a crucial aspect of their performance. The Electro-Voice ND86 utilizes a supercardioid pattern, which provides superior isolation from ambient sounds, making it particularly effective in noisy environments. This feature is essential for vocalists who require clarity amidst other sound sources. Conversely, the Shure PGA57 employs a cardioid pickup pattern that captures sound from the front while rejecting noise from the sides and rear. This makes the PGA57 suitable for both live and studio settings, though it may not isolate sound as effectively as the ND86.

Price Comparison

The price difference between the two microphones is significant, with the Electro-Voice ND86 retailing at $144.00 and the Shure PGA57 priced at $71.00. This places the ND86 at about 103% higher than the PGA57. For budget-conscious consumers or those just starting in their musical journey, the PGA57 offers an attractive entry point without sacrificing sound quality. However, for professionals seeking top-tier vocal performance, the investment in the ND86 may prove worthwhile.

Application Versatility

In terms of application, the Electro-Voice ND86 shines in vocal performances, making it an excellent choice for singers and public speakers. Its design ensures that vocal clarity is maintained even in challenging acoustics. On the other hand, the Shure PGA57 is versatile enough for a variety of applications, including amplified instruments and acoustic drum recordings. This versatility makes the PGA57 suitable for musicians who need a reliable mic for different scenarios, though it may not match the ND86 in vocal-centric environments.

Sales Ranking

Sales rank can be an indicator of popularity and consumer trust. The Electro-Voice ND86 holds a sales rank of 44,080, while the Shure PGA57 is significantly higher at 20,657. This suggests that the PGA57 is more favored among consumers, potentially due to its lower price point and versatility. For musicians and audio professionals looking for a well-regarded microphone, the PGA57’s higher sales rank may provide additional reassurance of its quality and performance.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Electro-Voice ND86 and the Shure PGA57 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you're a vocalist performing in large venues and require superior sound isolation and clarity, the ND86 may be the better choice despite its higher price tag. However, if you are looking for a more affordable, versatile microphone suitable for various instruments and settings, the Shure PGA57 offers excellent value at $71.00. Both microphones have their strengths, so the decision should be based on your primary use case and budget considerations.