vsversusfinder

Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal vs Shure SM57 Dynamic Microphone – Wired Cardioid XLR

Updated July 2026 — Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal wins on isolation, Shure SM57 Dynamic Microphone – Wired Cardioid XLR wins on versatility and price.

The Electro-Voice ND86 excels in vocal clarity for large venues, while the Shure SM57 offers versatility and value for various applications.

Why Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal is better

Vocal Clarity

Designed specifically for vocal performances.

Build Quality

Durable Memraflex grille.

Acoustic Isolation

Superior isolation for vocals.

Why Shure SM57 Dynamic Microphone – Wired Cardioid XLR is better

Versatility

Can handle a wide range of instruments.

Price

More budget-friendly option.

Sales Rank

Higher sales rank indicates popularity.

Overall score

Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid Vocal
82
Shure SM57 Dynamic Microphone – Wired Cardioid XLR
88

Specifications

SpecElectro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid VocalShure SM57 Dynamic Microphone – Wired Cardioid XLR
TypeDynamicDynamic
PatternSupercardioidCardioid
Price$144.00$98.00
Sales Rank44080279
Frequency Response50Hz - 18kHz40Hz - 15kHz

Dimension comparison

Electro-Voice ND86 Dynamic Supercardioid VocalShure SM57 Dynamic Microphone – Wired Cardioid XLR

Overview

When it comes to studio microphones, the Electro-Voice ND86 and the Shure SM57 are two strong contenders, each catering to different needs. The ND86 is priced at $144.00, while the SM57 is more budget-friendly at $98.00, making it about 17% cheaper. Both microphones are designed for high-performance applications, but they excel in different areas.

Design and Build Quality

The Electro-Voice ND86 features a robust design with a large-diaphragm dynamic supercardioid setup, making it suitable for large venues. Its durable Memraflex grille resists denting, ensuring longevity even under harsh conditions. On the other hand, the Shure SM57 is known for its road-tested durability, handling high sound pressure levels and frequent transport with ease. This rugged construction has made it a preferred choice for musicians and engineers worldwide. Both microphones are built to withstand the rigors of live performance, but the SM57's established reputation for reliability in varied environments gives it a slight edge.

Sound Quality

In terms of sound quality, the Electro-Voice ND86 aims to deliver a present, smooth, and detailed sound. Its large-diaphragm design enhances frequency response, which is particularly beneficial for vocal performances. Conversely, the Shure SM57 is celebrated for its contoured frequency response that enhances attack and clarity, making it a favorite for capturing instruments like guitars and snare drums. While both microphones excel in their respective areas, the ND86 is tailored more for vocal clarity, while the SM57 shines in its versatility across various instruments.

Acoustic Isolation

The Electro-Voice ND86 is designed with superior acoustic control in mind, ensuring excellent isolation from stage noise, which is crucial in large venues. Its shock-mounted capsule minimizes handling noise, allowing for a cleaner signal. In comparison, the Shure SM57 features a precise cardioid pickup pattern that effectively isolates sound sources while reducing background noise. This makes it particularly suitable for close-miking instruments in busy settings. Both microphones provide effective acoustic isolation, but the ND86 is more focused on vocal applications, whereas the SM57 is adept at dealing with a variety of sound sources.

Versatility

Versatility is a strong suit for the Shure SM57, which is often regarded as a true studio and stage staple. It can adapt to a wide range of applications, from guitar amplifiers to percussion, without compromising sound quality. The Electro-Voice ND86, while high-performing, is more specialized for vocal applications. If you're looking for a microphone that can handle various instruments and environments, the SM57's versatility makes it a more attractive option.

Pricing and Value

With a current price of $144.00, the Electro-Voice ND86 sits at the higher end of the spectrum compared to the Shure SM57, which is priced at $98.00. This price difference of $46.00 may be justified for those who prioritize vocal performance in large venues, but the SM57 offers exceptional value for those needing a reliable microphone for multiple applications. Given its impressive sales rank of 279, the SM57 has proven to be a favorite among users, indicating a strong perception of value.

Use Cases

The Electro-Voice ND86 is particularly well-suited for vocalists performing in large venues, where its design enhances vocal clarity and minimizes background noise. Its robust construction and acoustic properties make it a top choice for live performances. In contrast, the Shure SM57 is versatile enough to be used across a variety of applications, including studio recording and live sound for instruments. Its ability to capture the nuance of guitar amps, snare drums, and brass instruments makes it a workhorse microphone. Users with diverse needs may find the SM57 more applicable.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Electro-Voice ND86 and the Shure SM57 depends on your specific needs. If you are a vocalist performing in large venues and require superior vocal clarity, the ND86 is a solid choice. However, if you need a versatile, rugged microphone that can handle various instruments and environments, the SM57 is the better option at a lower price point. With its established reputation and adaptability, the Shure SM57 may offer the best value for most users.