vsversusfinder

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs LEWITT Tailored Response Dynamic Performance

Updated August 2026 — Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone wins on versatility and sound quality, LEWITT Tailored Response Dynamic Performance wins on durability and ease of use.

The Electro-Voice RE320 is a versatile microphone suitable for various applications, while the LEWITT DTP 340 TT excels in capturing percussion sounds. Choose based on your specific needs.

Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better

Versatility

Can handle vocals, guitars, and drums.

Sound Quality

Dynamic cardioid pattern with EQ switch.

Popularity

Higher sales rank in general market.

Why LEWITT Tailored Response Dynamic Performance is better

Price

Significantly cheaper option.

Durability

Designed for touring with rugged build.

Specialization

Optimized for toms and snare drums.

Overall score

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone
85
LEWITT Tailored Response Dynamic Performance
75

Specifications

SpecElectro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneLEWITT Tailored Response Dynamic Performance
TypeDynamicDynamic
PatternCardioidSupercardioid
EQ SwitchYesNo
Weight0.75 lbs0.67 lbs
Frequency Response20Hz-18kHz40Hz-20kHz

Dimension comparison

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneLEWITT Tailored Response Dynamic Performance

Overview of the Electro-Voice RE320 and LEWITT DTP 340 TT

The Electro-Voice RE320 is designed as a versatile broadcast microphone, while the LEWITT DTP 340 TT is tailored specifically for percussion instruments. The RE320 is priced at $315.00, making it significantly more expensive than the DTP 340 TT, which retails for $129.00, about 59% less. Each microphone brings unique strengths to the table, catering to different recording needs and environments.

Design and Build Quality

The Electro-Voice RE320 features a durable construction, ideal for heavy use in studio settings. Its robust design includes an integrated humbucking coil that minimizes interference from external noise, ensuring a cleaner sound. In contrast, the LEWITT DTP 340 TT boasts a full-metal, die-cast body that can withstand the rigors of touring. Its hardened steel-mesh grille is designed to resist wear and abuse, making it equally resilient. Both microphones are built to last, but the LEWITT may have a slight edge in portability and ruggedness due to its touring-oriented design.

Sound Quality and Performance

In terms of sound quality, the Electro-Voice RE320 is noted for its dynamic cardioid pattern and a two-position EQ switch, allowing it to adapt to various recording situations. This feature is particularly beneficial for capturing kick drum sounds with added punch, making it a favorite among musicians and sound engineers. Meanwhile, the LEWITT DTP 340 TT is engineered with a tailored frequency response that delivers a powerful yet smooth sound, specifically optimized for toms and snare drums. This microphone's supercardioid pickup pattern effectively reduces feedback and isolates the desired sound source, making it an excellent choice for live performances.

Application Versatility

The Electro-Voice RE320 is marketed as a multi-purpose microphone, capable of handling vocals, guitars, horns, and drums with ease. Its versatility makes it suitable for a wide range of audio applications, from studio recordings to live broadcasting. On the other hand, the LEWITT DTP 340 TT is more specialized, focusing primarily on percussion instruments. While it excels in this niche, it may not serve well in broader applications outside of drums and similar instruments. Therefore, for those seeking a one-size-fits-all solution, the RE320 may be the better option.

Price Comparison

With the Electro-Voice RE320 priced at $315.00 and the LEWITT DTP 340 TT at $129.00, the price difference is significant. The LEWITT is approximately 59% cheaper than the Electro-Voice, making it a more accessible option for musicians on a budget or those who need a dedicated mic for percussion. This substantial cost disparity may influence purchasing decisions, especially for beginners or those who need to invest in multiple pieces of equipment.

Best-selling Status

The Electro-Voice RE320 holds a bestseller rank of 76,619, reflecting its popularity among users looking for a reliable broadcast microphone. In comparison, the LEWITT DTP 340 TT has a slightly better rank at 59,691, indicating a strong preference for its tailored design among drummers and live sound engineers. This difference in sales rank could indicate a greater demand for the LEWITT microphone within its specific market segment.

User Experience and Accessibility

The user experience varies between both microphones. The Electro-Voice RE320 is designed with a user-friendly interface, particularly the dual EQ switch, which allows for quick adjustments without needing extensive technical knowledge. This feature can be particularly appealing for those new to audio recording. Conversely, the LEWITT DTP 340 TT comes with additional accessories, including a shock mount and drum mount, enhancing its usability for live settings. This comprehensive package may provide additional value for users focused on live performance.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the LEWITT DTP 340 TT ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you require a versatile microphone that can handle various instruments and vocals, the Electro-Voice RE320 is the better choice, despite its higher price tag. However, if your focus is primarily on capturing the nuances of toms and snare drums, the LEWITT DTP 340 TT, with its tailored response and lower price, may be the ideal option for you. Consider your recording preferences and budget to make the best decision for your audio needs.