vsversusfinder

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs Sennheiser E602 II Cardioid Instrument Microphone

Updated August 2026 — Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone leads on versatility and features.

The Electro-Voice RE320 offers greater versatility and features, while the Sennheiser E602 II provides excellent value for instrument recording.

Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better

Versatility

RE320 can handle various audio sources.

Features

Includes a two-position EQ switch.

Build Quality

Durable design with humbucking coil.

Why Sennheiser E602 II Cardioid Instrument Microphone is better

Price

E602 II is significantly cheaper.

Weight

Lightweight aluminum body.

Sales Rank

Higher sales rank indicates popularity.

Overall score

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone
85
Sennheiser E602 II Cardioid Instrument Microphone
75

Specifications

SpecElectro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneSennheiser E602 II Cardioid Instrument Microphone
TypeDynamicDynamic
EQ SwitchYesNo
Frequency ResponseFlat/KickLow-Frequency
Body MaterialMetalAluminum
Ideal UseVocals/InstrumentsBass Instruments

Dimension comparison

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneSennheiser E602 II Cardioid Instrument Microphone

Overview of the Electro-Voice RE320 and Sennheiser E602 II

The Electro-Voice RE320 is priced at $315.00, while the Sennheiser E602 II is about 17% cheaper at $159.00. Both microphones cater to different audio recording needs, making them suitable for various applications in studios and live settings. The RE320 is designed primarily for broadcast and music recording, whereas the E602 II focuses on instrument amplification, particularly for bass-heavy signals.

Design and Build Quality

The design of the Electro-Voice RE320 incorporates a durable structure with an integrated humbucking coil that minimizes unwanted noise. It is specifically tailored for a range of recording scenarios, including vocals and instruments. In contrast, the Sennheiser E602 II features a lightweight aluminum body, which enhances its stability when positioned on microphone boom arms. This rugged design makes it ideal for both studio and live environments, ensuring it can handle rough usage without sacrificing performance.

Sound Performance

The Electro-Voice RE320 boasts a unique two-position EQ switch that allows users to select between a flat response for general instrument use and a tailored kick drum EQ, ideal for achieving a punchy sound in bass-heavy recordings. This versatility makes it a go-to choice for many audio professionals. Conversely, the Sennheiser E602 II is engineered with a lightweight high-performance voice coil, providing a fast transient response and low-frequency extension. This makes it particularly effective for capturing problematic bass signals, offering musicians a reliable option for instrument amplification.

Versatility in Usage

With its ability to switch between different EQ settings, the Electro-Voice RE320 is incredibly versatile, suitable for vocals, horns, guitar amps, bass amps, and drums. This broad application range allows users to adapt the microphone to various recording styles. On the other hand, the Sennheiser E602 II excels in direct use on bass signals, making it the ideal choice for musicians and sound engineers looking for a dedicated instrument microphone. This specialization may limit its versatility compared to the RE320 but ensures exceptional performance in its intended applications.

Price Comparison

The price difference between these two microphones is significant; the Electro-Voice RE320 retails for $315.00, while the Sennheiser E602 II is available for $159.00. This means that the RE320 is nearly double the price of the E602 II. For budget-conscious buyers or those just starting in audio recording, the E602 II offers a compelling entry point without sacrificing quality. However, professionals may find the enhanced features of the RE320 worth the higher investment.

Sales and Popularity

In terms of sales rank, the Sennheiser E602 II holds a better position at 49,783 compared to the Electro-Voice RE320, which ranks at 76,619. This suggests that the E602 II may be a more popular choice among users, likely due to its affordability and targeted performance. However, the RE320's established reputation in the industry as a reliable broadcast microphone cannot be overlooked, appealing to professionals who require high-quality sound for various applications.

Target Audience

The Electro-Voice RE320 primarily targets audio professionals and enthusiasts who require a versatile, high-quality microphone for a variety of recording situations. Its features cater to those who need reliable performance for vocals and instruments alike. In contrast, the Sennheiser E602 II is designed with musicians and sound engineers in mind, particularly those focused on capturing bass instruments. This differentiation in target audience highlights the importance of selecting the right microphone based on specific needs and applications.

Which should you buy?

The decision between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Sennheiser E602 II ultimately depends on your specific recording needs and budget. If you're looking for a versatile microphone with the ability to adapt to various audio sources, the RE320 may be worth the investment. However, if you're focused on instrument recording and need a more affordable option, the E602 II offers excellent performance and value for money. Consider what features are most important to you, as both microphones serve distinct purposes in the audio recording landscape.