vsversusfinder

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs Sennheiser e609 Silver Drum Mic + Free XLR

Updated August 2026 — Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone wins on versatility and sound quality, Sennheiser e609 Silver Drum Mic + Free XLR wins on ease of use.

The Electro-Voice RE320 offers superior versatility and sound quality, while the Sennheiser e609 is a budget-friendly option tailored for instrument capture.

Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better

Versatility

Ideal for vocals and instruments

Sound Quality

Exceptional audio experience with EQ switch

Build Quality

Durable design with humbucking coil

Why Sennheiser e609 Silver Drum Mic + Free XLR is better

Price

More affordable option

Weight

Lighter for easy transport

Included Cable

Comes with a free XLR cable

Overall score

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone
85
Sennheiser e609 Silver Drum Mic + Free XLR
75

Specifications

SpecElectro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneSennheiser e609 Silver Drum Mic + Free XLR
TypeDynamic CardioidDynamic Supercardioid
Frequency Response20 Hz - 18 kHz40 Hz - 18 kHz
EQ SwitchYesNo
ConstructionMetalMetal
Sales Rank7661939301

Dimension comparison

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneSennheiser e609 Silver Drum Mic + Free XLR

Overview of the Electro-Voice RE320 and Sennheiser e609

The Electro-Voice RE320 is a dynamic cardioid microphone suited for various recording applications, while the Sennheiser e609 is a dynamic supercardioid mic primarily designed for instruments, particularly guitar cabinets. The RE320 is priced at $315.00, making it significantly more expensive than the e609, which retails for $99.95. This price difference of about 68% highlights a key consideration for budget-conscious buyers.

Design and Build Quality

The Electro-Voice RE320 boasts a durable design with a classic broadcast microphone aesthetic. Its build quality is enhanced by an integrated humbucking coil that minimizes unwanted noise, making it reliable in various environments. Conversely, the Sennheiser e609 features a rugged metal construction that is specifically designed to withstand the rigors of live performances. Its flat grill design allows for easy placement, especially in tight spaces. While both microphones prioritize durability, the e609’s design is tailored for on-the-road use, making it a practical choice for musicians.

Sound Quality and Performance

When it comes to sound quality, the Electro-Voice RE320 is known for its exceptional versatility. It features a two-position EQ switch that allows users to choose between a flat response or a tailored kick drum EQ, which is ideal for capturing the punchy sound of bass drums. The RE320 excels in vocal and instrument recordings, delivering a rich audio experience. In comparison, the Sennheiser e609 is engineered for instruments, particularly excelling in front of guitar cabinets. Its supercardioid pattern effectively isolates the sound source, reducing off-axis noise. Each microphone has been crafted for specific applications, with the RE320 offering a broader range of uses.

Connectivity and Usability

The Electro-Voice RE320 connects via a standard XLR cable, providing compatibility with most recording and live sound setups. Its user-friendly design caters to both amateur and professional users. The Sennheiser e609 also uses an XLR connection and comes with a free XLR cable, adding value to its purchase. This makes the e609 not only a cost-effective option but also a convenient one for those who may not have additional cables handy. Both mics are designed for straightforward usability, but the added cable with the e609 enhances its overall appeal.

Market Position and Sales Rank

The Electro-Voice RE320 holds a bestseller rank of 76,619 in the microphone category, indicating a decent level of sales and popularity within its price bracket. On the other hand, the Sennheiser e609 has a significantly better bestseller rank of 39,301, suggesting that it is a more popular choice among consumers. This difference could be attributed to its more accessible price point and targeted design for instrument capture, making it a go-to mic for many musicians.

Target Audience

The target audience for the Electro-Voice RE320 includes professionals and serious hobbyists looking for a versatile microphone that performs well across various applications. Its higher price reflects its quality and adaptability. In contrast, the Sennheiser e609 is aimed at musicians who need a reliable, high-quality microphone specifically for instruments, especially in live settings. Its affordability and effective performance in rejecting feedback make it an attractive option for gigging musicians.

Additional Features

The Electro-Voice RE320 is equipped with a kick drum EQ switch that enhances its functionality for specific recording situations, particularly for bass-heavy instruments. This feature is a significant advantage for users looking for a tailored sound. Meanwhile, the Sennheiser e609's hum compensating coil helps control low-frequency noise, which is valuable for a clean sound during performances. Each microphone has unique features that cater to different recording needs, making them suitable for distinct applications.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Sennheiser e609 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If versatility and high-quality recording for vocals and instruments are your priorities, the Electro-Voice RE320 is worth the investment at $315.00. However, if you're looking for an affordable, reliable microphone primarily for instrument capture, the Sennheiser e609 at $99.95 is a compelling choice. Its substantial cost savings of about 68% makes it an excellent option for those who need quality without breaking the bank.