Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs Sennheiser e902 Cardioid Dynamic Mic for Kick Drum,black
Updated August 2026 — Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone leads on design and sound quality.
The Electro-Voice RE320 offers versatility across various instruments, while the Sennheiser e902 excels specifically for kick drum performance.
Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better
Versatility
Can handle various instruments and vocals.
Durability
Robust construction with humbucking coil.
EQ Feature
Two-position EQ switch for tailored sound.
Why Sennheiser e902 Cardioid Dynamic Mic for Kick Drum,black is better
Price
More budget-friendly option.
Kick Drum Focus
Optimized for deep bass frequencies.
Sales Rank
Higher sales rank indicates popularity.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone | Sennheiser e902 Cardioid Dynamic Mic for Kick Drum,black |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Pattern | Cardioid | Cardioid |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz-18kHz | 40Hz-18kHz |
| Weight | 0.75 lbs | 0.65 lbs |
| Included Accessories | None | Pouch, Manual |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Electro-Voice RE320 and Sennheiser e902
The Electro-Voice RE320 is priced at $315.00, while the Sennheiser e902 comes in at $219.00, making the latter about 30% cheaper. Both microphones are designed for dynamic applications, but they cater to slightly different needs. The RE320 is celebrated for its versatility across various instruments, while the e902 is specifically optimized for kick drums and deep bass instruments. This price difference and targeted design make each microphone appealing in its own right, depending on the user’s specific requirements.
Build Quality and Design
The Electro-Voice RE320 is known for its durability and robust construction. It features a humbucking coil that minimizes noise interference, ensuring a clean signal during use. On the other hand, the Sennheiser e902 also boasts a well-designed structure, including an integrated stand mount and a shock-mounted capsule that helps in reducing handling noise. Both microphones are built to withstand the rigors of live performance and studio work, but the RE320 edges out slightly in overall durability thanks to its design features aimed at minimizing external noise.
Frequency Response and Sound
The RE320 comes with a unique two-position EQ switch that allows users to select between a flat response and a tailored EQ for kick drums. This feature enhances its versatility, making it suitable for a variety of applications beyond just drum recording. Conversely, the Sennheiser e902 is specifically optimized for kick drums, featuring a frequency response that effectively captures deep bass frequencies. While the RE320 can be used for different instruments, the e902 excels in producing the punchy sound characteristic of kick drums, making it an excellent choice for drummers.
Performance in Different Settings
When it comes to performance, the Electro-Voice RE320 is designed to handle vocals, horns, guitar amps, bass amps, and drums, showcasing its versatility. In contrast, the Sennheiser e902 is tailored for deep bass instruments and excels in scenarios where punch and clarity in low frequencies are paramount. The e902's fast attack and ability to handle high sound pressure levels (SPLs) make it well-suited for live performances, particularly in rock or metal genres where kick drum clarity is crucial. Therefore, while both microphones perform well, their ideal settings differ significantly.
Price and Value Proposition
The Electro-Voice RE320 is priced at $315.00, while the Sennheiser e902 is more budget-friendly at $219.00. This price difference of $96 means that the e902 is approximately 30% less expensive than the RE320. For those focused solely on kick drum performance, the lower price of the e902 presents a compelling value. However, if you require a microphone that can handle various instruments and vocal applications, the investment in the RE320 could be justified. Ultimately, the value proposition depends on the specific needs of the user.
Sales Rank and Popularity
The Electro-Voice RE320 has a sales rank of 76,619, while the Sennheiser e902 ranks significantly higher at 46,863. This difference in ranking suggests that the e902 may be more popular among consumers, particularly in the context of kick drum recording. High sales rank often correlates with user satisfaction and product reliability, indicating that many users trust the Sennheiser e902 for its intended application. However, the RE320's lower sales rank does not diminish its effectiveness; it simply highlights different target markets.
User Experience and Feedback
While specific user reviews are not provided, the features and design of both microphones suggest differing user experiences. The Electro-Voice RE320, with its dual EQ switch and versatility, likely appeals to a wider range of users who require flexibility in their recording setup. In contrast, the Sennheiser e902, with its focused design for kick drums, may attract users who prioritize specific sound profiles. Both products, however, are designed with user needs in mind, ensuring a satisfactory experience for their respective target audiences.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the choice between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Sennheiser e902 ultimately depends on your specific recording needs. If you require versatility across various instruments and vocal applications, the RE320 is a worthwhile investment despite its higher price. However, if you are primarily focused on kick drum performance and want a more budget-friendly option, the e902 is an excellent choice. With a price difference of about 30% and a focus on low-frequency reproduction, the Sennheiser e902 stands out as a specialized tool for kick drum enthusiasts.

