Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs Sennheiser evolution e904 Dynamic Instrument Microphone
Updated August 2026 — Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone wins on versatility and sound, Sennheiser evolution e904 Dynamic Instrument Microphone wins on price and ease of use.
The Electro-Voice RE320 offers greater versatility and advanced features, while the Sennheiser e904 is a more budget-friendly option focused on percussion.
Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better
Versatility
Can handle various instruments including vocals and drums.
Features
Includes a dual EQ switch for tailored sound.
Durability
Robust construction with humbucking coil.
Why Sennheiser evolution e904 Dynamic Instrument Microphone is better
Price
More affordable option at $218.45.
Compact Design
Easier to attach to drums with a clip.
Popularity
Higher sales rank indicates user preference.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone | Sennheiser evolution e904 Dynamic Instrument Microphone |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Frequency Response | Dual EQ | Full Sound |
| Application | Vocals & Instruments | Drums & Percussion |
| Weight | Heavy | Light |
| Warranty | N/A | 10 Years |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Electro-Voice RE320 and Sennheiser e904
The Electro-Voice RE320 and the Sennheiser e904 are both dynamic microphones designed for professional audio use, but they cater to different applications. The RE320 is priced at $315.00, while the e904 is more budget-friendly at $218.45, making it about 30% cheaper than its competitor. This article will explore their features, sound quality, versatility, and more to help you make an informed choice.
Sound Quality Comparison
Sound quality is paramount for any microphone, and both the Electro-Voice RE320 and Sennheiser e904 excel in their respective domains. The RE320 is renowned for its "Dual Personality" frequency response switch, which allows users to choose between a flat response and a tailored kick drum EQ. This feature is particularly beneficial for achieving a punchy sound, especially when recording drums or bass instruments. On the other hand, the e904 boasts a full, impressive, and lively sound specifically designed for drums and percussion, with excellent sound profiling that adapts to various percussive styles. Each microphone offers unique advantages in sound fidelity, depending on the intended application.
Design and Build Quality
When it comes to design and build quality, both microphones are constructed for durability in professional settings. The Electro-Voice RE320 is noted for its robust construction and integrated humbucking coil, which minimizes hum and buzz, ensuring a clean audio signal. Meanwhile, the Sennheiser e904 is compact with a robust metal casing, designed for easy attachment to drum rims and snare setups. Its design focuses on functionality and ease of use, which can be a considerable advantage for live performances. Both microphones are built to withstand the rigors of professional use, but the RE320's additional features may appeal to those who prioritize sound clarity.
Versatility in Application
Versatility is another key factor when comparing these two microphones. The Electro-Voice RE320 is versatile enough to handle vocals, horns, guitar amps, bass amps, and drums, making it suitable for a wide range of recording scenarios. Its two-position EQ switch enhances this versatility by allowing users to tailor the microphone's response to specific instruments. In contrast, the Sennheiser e904 is primarily designed for drums and percussion, making it less versatile for other applications. While it excels in its designated role, it may not be the best choice for those looking to use a microphone across multiple instruments.
Ease of Use
Both the Electro-Voice RE320 and Sennheiser e904 are designed with user-friendliness in mind, but they have different approaches. The RE320 features a straightforward dual EQ switch that allows users to quickly adjust for different recording situations. Its durable design ensures it can withstand frequent handling without compromising performance. The e904, being compact and lightweight, comes with a clip for easy attachment to drums, making it incredibly user-friendly for live setups. While both microphones offer ease of use, the e904’s design specifically caters to drummers, while the RE320 provides more versatility for various recording environments.
Pricing and Value
In terms of pricing, the Electro-Voice RE320 is listed at $315.00, whereas the Sennheiser e904 is available for $218.45, making the e904 around $96.55 less expensive. This price difference of about 30% may appeal to budget-conscious buyers who still want a quality microphone. However, investing in the RE320 could be worthwhile for those who require its advanced features and versatility. Ultimately, both microphones offer good value for money, but potential buyers should consider their specific needs and budget before making a decision.
Popularity and Sales Rank
When looking at the sales rank, the Electro-Voice RE320 holds a rank of 76,619, while the Sennheiser e904 is slightly more popular with a rank of 67,111. This difference in popularity may indicate a preference among users for the e904, particularly for those focused on percussion instruments. Popularity can often correlate with user satisfaction, so those considering these microphones may find the e904’s higher sales rank to be a testament to its reliability and performance in the field.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Sennheiser e904 depends largely on your specific needs and budget. If you require a versatile microphone suitable for various instruments and recording scenarios, the RE320 with its advanced EQ features might be the better choice. However, if you are primarily focused on recording drums and percussion and want a more budget-friendly option, the e904 offers excellent performance at a lower price. Ultimately, both microphones deliver quality sound, but your choice should align with your particular audio requirements and financial considerations.

