Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs Sennheiser Pro Audio E604 Dynamic Cardioid
Updated August 2026 — Sennheiser Pro Audio E604 Dynamic Cardioid leads on sound quality and versatility.
The Electro-Voice RE320 is a great choice for broadcast applications, while the Sennheiser E604 kit excels in instrument miking.
Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better
Price
RE320 is $315.00, cheaper than E604 at $399.00.
Broadcast Use
RE320 is specifically designed for broadcast applications.
Durability
RE320 has a robust design for longevity.
Why Sennheiser Pro Audio E604 Dynamic Cardioid is better
Popularity
E604 has a better sales rank of 17,126.
Versatility
E604 kit includes three microphones for various instruments.
Sound Quality
E604 offers a transparent and dynamic signal response.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone | Sennheiser Pro Audio E604 Dynamic Cardioid |
|---|---|---|
| Microphone Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Frequency Response | Flat/Kick EQ | Optimized for drums |
| Included Mics | 1 | 3 |
| Sound Handling | 160 dB | 160 dB |
| Weight | Not Specified | Lightweight |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Electro-Voice RE320 and Sennheiser E604
The Electro-Voice RE320 is priced at $315.00, while the Sennheiser E604 kit comes in at $399.00, making the RE320 about 21% cheaper. Both microphones cater to different needs in the studio environment, with the RE320 designed primarily for broadcast applications and the E604 optimized for instrument miking. The RE320 boasts a unique "Dual Personality" frequency response switch, while the E604 kit provides three microphones tailored for high sound level handling.
Sound Quality
When comparing sound quality, the Electro-Voice RE320 stands out with its kick drum EQ switch, which enables users to achieve a punchy sound that is ideal for various applications including vocals and instruments. The RE320's frequency response versatility allows it to accommodate a wide range of sound sources. Conversely, the Sennheiser E604 is designed with a transparent and dynamic signal response, optimized for drums and percussion. This makes it particularly effective in live settings where clarity and low distortion are paramount. Both microphones deliver high-quality sound, but their strengths lie in different areas.
Design and Build Quality
The Electro-Voice RE320 is engineered for durability, featuring a robust design that ensures longevity in demanding environments. Its integrated humbucking coil minimizes unwanted noise, making it a reliable choice for both studio and live applications. On the other hand, the Sennheiser E604 kit includes three microphones, each with a reinforced glass fiber body that is built to withstand the rigors of live performances. The lightweight voice coil in the E604 enhances its transient response, contributing to its overall resilience. While both products are built for durability, the RE320 is singularly focused on broadcast use, whereas the E604 kit's design supports multi-instrument miking.
Features and Versatility
The Electro-Voice RE320 offers a unique two-position EQ switch that allows for a tailored sound profile, providing versatility for various recording situations. This feature is particularly beneficial for users who need to adjust their microphone's response for different instruments or vocal styles. In contrast, the Sennheiser E604 kit provides three dynamic cardioid microphones, which are excellent for miking drum sets and brass instruments. The inclusion of multiple microphones in the E604 kit enhances its versatility, making it an attractive option for those who need to mic various instruments simultaneously. Each product offers unique features that cater to different recording environments.
Pricing and Value
The Electro-Voice RE320 is priced at $315.00, which is more cost-effective compared to the Sennheiser E604 kit at $399.00. This represents a price difference of $84.00, or about 21%. For those on a tighter budget, the RE320 offers significant value, particularly given its advanced features geared towards recording and broadcasting. However, the E604 kit provides three microphones for the additional cost, which may justify the higher price for users who require multiple mics for different instruments. Depending on your specific needs, the pricing dynamics could greatly influence your decision.
Sales Rank and Popularity
The Electro-Voice RE320 has a sales rank of 76,619, while the Sennheiser E604 kit performs significantly better with a sales rank of 17,126. This suggests that the E604 is more popular among users, possibly due to its versatility and inclusion of multiple microphones in one package. Popularity can often indicate user satisfaction and reliability in performance, making the Sennheiser a compelling choice for many. However, the RE320 remains a strong contender for users specifically looking for a high-quality broadcast microphone.
Target Audience
The Electro-Voice RE320 is particularly suited for audio professionals focused on broadcast applications, including podcasters, vocalists, and musicians looking for a versatile microphone that delivers exceptional sound quality. Its specialized features cater to those needing a dynamic microphone that can adapt to various recording contexts. In contrast, the Sennheiser E604 kit is aimed at musicians and sound engineers who require high-quality mics for instrument miking, especially in live settings. The kit's three microphones provide the flexibility necessary for diverse performance scenarios, making it ideal for drummers and bands that need to capture multiple instruments clearly.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, your choice between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Sennheiser E604 kit should be based on your specific needs. If you are primarily focused on vocal and broadcast applications, the RE320 offers exceptional quality and a price advantage at $315.00. However, if you need a robust solution for miking various instruments, the Sennheiser E604 kit, despite its higher price of $399.00, offers three versatile microphones that can handle high sound levels and provide clarity in dynamic environments. Consider your recording context and budget to make the best decision for your audio needs.

