Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs Sennheiser Professional e 609 Silver
Updated August 2026 — Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone wins on ease of use and build quality, Sennheiser Professional e 609 Silver wins on noise isolation.
The Electro-Voice RE320 offers superior versatility and sound quality, while the Sennheiser e 609 is a more affordable option focused on instrument miking.
Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better
Versatility
RE320's dual EQ switch enhances its adaptability.
Build Quality
RE320 is designed for robust professional use.
Sound Quality
RE320 captures a wider range of frequencies effectively.
Why Sennheiser Professional e 609 Silver is better
Price
e 609 is significantly cheaper.
Weight
e 609 is lighter and easier to handle.
Popularity
e 609 has a better sales rank.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone | Sennheiser Professional e 609 Silver |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency Response | 20 Hz - 18 kHz | 40 Hz - 18 kHz |
| Pickup Pattern | Cardioid | Super-cardioid |
| EQ Switch | Yes | No |
| Construction | Durable | Metal |
| Noise Cancellation | Humbucking Coil | Hum Compensating Coil |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Electro-Voice RE320 and Sennheiser e 609
The Electro-Voice RE320 is priced at $315.00, while the Sennheiser e 609 is significantly cheaper at $99.95, making it about 68% less expensive. This stark price difference reflects the distinct purposes and features of these two dynamic microphones. The RE320 is designed primarily for broadcast applications, while the e 609 is tailored for instrument miking, particularly for guitar cabinets and drums.
Build Quality and Design
The Electro-Voice RE320 boasts an extremely durable build, tailored for robust usage in professional settings. Its design includes an integrated humbucking coil that minimizes unwanted noise, enhancing its performance in a studio or live environment. On the other hand, the Sennheiser e 609 also features rugged metal construction, providing reliability on stage. Its flat-profile design allows it to be positioned close to sound sources, making it versatile for both guitar and drum miking. While both microphones are built to withstand the rigors of performance, the RE320's heavier emphasis on durability makes it suitable for more intensive use.
Sound Quality
Sound quality is paramount in any microphone comparison, and both the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Sennheiser e 609 deliver exceptional audio. The RE320 offers a unique "Dual Personality" frequency response switch, allowing users to switch between a flat response and a tailored kick drum EQ, ideal for capturing the punch of bass drums and other instruments. Conversely, the e 609 is designed to handle high sound pressure levels without distortion, ensuring clear sound capture, particularly for guitar cabs and toms. Its super-cardioid pickup pattern isolates sound effectively, which is crucial in live settings.
Frequency Response and Versatility
The Electro-Voice RE320 features a versatile frequency response, especially with its EQ switch tailored for different instruments. This adaptability makes it suitable for a range of applications, from vocals to instruments. In contrast, the Sennheiser e 609 has a frequency response ranging from 40 Hz to 18 kHz, optimized for specific miking situations like guitar cabinets and drums. While both microphones are versatile, the RE320’s dual EQ functionality gives it an edge in varied recording environments, whereas the e 609 excels in close-miking scenarios.
Noise Cancellation and Interference
Both microphones incorporate features to reduce unwanted noise and interference. The Electro-Voice RE320 includes an integrated humbucking coil that effectively minimizes hum and buzz, important for clean recordings. The Sennheiser e 609 also features a hum compensating coil that reduces electrical interference, making it reliable for live performances where electrical noise can be an issue. This aspect of both microphones is crucial, especially in professional settings where sound clarity is paramount.
Target Audience and Use Cases
The target audience for the Electro-Voice RE320 includes broadcasters and studio engineers seeking high-quality sound for a variety of instruments and vocals. Its price point reflects its professional-grade capabilities. Conversely, the Sennheiser e 609 is ideal for musicians and sound engineers focused specifically on instruments, especially guitarists and drummers. Its lower price makes it accessible for those who need reliable performance without breaking the bank.
Sales Performance and Popularity
In terms of sales rank, the Sennheiser e 609 performs significantly better, holding a bestseller rank of 4138 compared to the Electro-Voice RE320's 76619. This suggests that the e 609 is not only more popular among consumers but also likely offers good value for those looking for a reliable instrument microphone. The RE320's position may reflect its niche appeal, primarily among professionals who require its specific features.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Sennheiser e 609 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you’re seeking a versatile microphone suitable for various applications, including vocals and instruments, the RE320 is a worthwhile investment despite its higher price. However, if you’re primarily focused on instrument miking—especially for guitar and drums—the Sennheiser e 609 provides excellent sound quality at a much lower price, making it about 68% cheaper. Therefore, for musicians or budget-conscious buyers, the e 609 is likely the better choice, while the RE320 remains a top-tier option for professional broadcast and studio applications.

