vsversusfinder

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs Shure Beta 52 and SM57 Kick and Snare Dynamic

Updated August 2026 — Shure Beta 52 and SM57 Kick and Snare Dynamic leads on ease of use and value for money.

The Electro-Voice RE320 offers specialized features for kick drum recording, while the Shure bundle provides versatility with two microphones. Choose based on your specific needs.

Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better

Specialized EQ

The RE320 has a unique EQ switch for kick drum sounds.

Durability

The RE320 features a robust design with a humbucking coil.

Brand Reputation

Electro-Voice is known for high-quality broadcast microphones.

Why Shure Beta 52 and SM57 Kick and Snare Dynamic is better

Price

The Shure bundle is $20 cheaper.

Versatility

Includes two microphones for different applications.

Popularity

Higher sales rank indicates greater consumer preference.

Overall score

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone
78
Shure Beta 52 and SM57 Kick and Snare Dynamic
85

Specifications

SpecElectro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneShure Beta 52 and SM57 Kick and Snare Dynamic
TypeDynamicDynamic
PatternCardioidSupercardioid/Cardioid
EQ SwitchYesNo
Microphones12
Weight0.75 lbs1.5 lbs

Dimension comparison

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneShure Beta 52 and SM57 Kick and Snare Dynamic

Overview of the Products

The Electro-Voice RE320 is priced at $315.00, while the Shure Beta 52 and SM57 bundle is available for $295.00, making the latter about 17% cheaper. Both microphones are designed for professional audio applications, but they cater to slightly different needs in the studio environment. The RE320 stands out with its specialized EQ switch that enhances kick drum sounds, whereas the Shure bundle includes two microphones, making it versatile for both kick and snare drums.

Brand Reputation

Electro-Voice and Shure are both reputable brands in the microphone industry, known for their quality and reliability. The RE320, with a sales rank of 76,619, has a solid standing, while the Shure bundle ranks significantly higher at 61,012. This difference in sales rank indicates that Shure’s products may be more popular among consumers, which can be an important consideration for those looking for a trusted choice.

Target Use Cases

The Electro-Voice RE320 is specifically designed for broadcast and music recording, making it ideal for vocals, guitar amps, and drum applications. Its unique feature is the two-position EQ switch that allows users to toggle between a flat response and a tailored kick drum EQ. On the other hand, the Shure Beta 52 and SM57 bundle addresses a broader range of applications. The Beta 52 is tailored for kick drums, while the SM57 is a versatile instrument microphone, suitable for snare and other instruments. This dual-purpose capability makes the Shure bundle appealing for a wider range of recording scenarios.

Sound Quality

In terms of sound quality, the Electro-Voice RE320 is praised for its "Dual Personality" frequency response, allowing for a punchy kick drum sound when the EQ switch is activated. This can be particularly advantageous in live and studio settings where bass response is critical. The Shure Beta 52 and SM57, while not explicitly detailed in terms of sound profiles, are known for their durability and reliability, often delivering clear and consistent audio. Users can expect high-quality sound from both products, but the RE320’s tailored EQ may provide a more specialized sound for specific instruments.

Durability and Design

Both microphones are designed to withstand the rigors of professional use. The Electro-Voice RE320 features an integrated humbucking coil, which minimizes noise interference, ensuring clean audio capture. The Shure bundle is similarly built for durability, with each microphone designed to handle the demands of live performances and studio recording. However, the RE320 specifically highlights its robust construction, making it a reliable choice for those who require a microphone that can endure frequent use.

Pricing Analysis

The Electro-Voice RE320 is priced at $315.00, while the Shure Beta 52 and SM57 bundle is slightly less at $295.00. This $20 difference signifies that the Shure bundle offers a more economical option for users who need multiple microphones for various applications. Additionally, considering the Shure bundle's higher sales rank, it appears to offer better value for money in terms of popularity and demand.

User Experience

When it comes to user experience, the Electro-Voice RE320 is noted for its ease of use, particularly with its EQ switch, which allows for quick adjustments on-the-fly during recordings. The Shure Beta 52 and SM57 bundle, while also user-friendly, provides versatility that can be beneficial for users who require different microphone types for various instruments. The combination of these two microphones can enhance the overall recording experience by providing options for different sound sources.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Shure Beta 52 and SM57 bundle ultimately depends on your specific needs as an audio professional. If you are looking for a specialized microphone with a tailored kick drum EQ and a solid reputation in broadcast settings, the RE320 may be your best choice. However, if versatility and cost-effectiveness are more critical for your projects, the Shure bundle, priced at $295.00, provides excellent value with two high-quality microphones. Consider your primary use cases and budget to make the best decision.