vsversusfinder

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs Shure BETA 52A Kick Drum Microphone -

Updated August 2026 — Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone wins on versatility and sound quality, Shure BETA 52A Kick Drum Microphone - wins on feedback rejecti.

The Electro-Voice RE320 offers versatility for various instruments, while the Shure BETA 52A excels in kick drum performance at a lower price.

Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better

Versatility

Can handle various instruments and vocals.

EQ Features

Includes a two-position EQ switch.

Build Quality

Designed for durability and multiple applications.

Why Shure BETA 52A Kick Drum Microphone - is better

Price

More affordable option for kick drum use.

Setup

Includes a locking stand adapter for easy setup.

Noise Isolation

Superior feedback rejection and noise isolation.

Overall score

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone
85
Shure BETA 52A Kick Drum Microphone -
75

Specifications

SpecElectro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneShure BETA 52A Kick Drum Microphone -
TypeDynamicDynamic
PatternCardioidSupercardioid
Frequency Response20Hz-18kHz20Hz-10kHz
Sensitivity-55 dBV-51 dBV
Built-in AdapterNoYes

Dimension comparison

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneShure BETA 52A Kick Drum Microphone -

Overview of the Electro-Voice RE320 and Shure BETA 52A

The Electro-Voice RE320 and Shure BETA 52A are two prominent microphones designed for different applications, yet they both excel in live and studio environments. The RE320 is priced at $315.00, while the BETA 52A is about 37% cheaper at $197.00. This price difference may influence your decision based on your budget and intended use.

Design and Build Quality

Both microphones exhibit robust build quality, ensuring durability during live performances. The Electro-Voice RE320 is designed with a focus on versatility for various instruments, while the Shure BETA 52A features a hardened steel mesh grille that resists wear and abuse, making it particularly suited for the rigors of touring. The BETA 52A also includes a dynamic locking stand adapter, which simplifies setup, especially inside a kick drum. This practical design feature could be crucial for musicians who need quick deployment during performances.

Sound Quality and Performance

When it comes to sound quality, the Electro-Voice RE320 offers a unique two-position EQ switch that allows for a flat response or a tailored kick drum EQ. This feature enhances its versatility, making it suitable for vocals, horns, and guitar amps, in addition to drums. In contrast, the Shure BETA 52A is specifically tailored for kick drums, providing superb attack and "punch" with its modified supercardioid pattern. The BETA 52A's design ensures high gain before feedback and excellent rejection of unwanted sound, making it ideal for bass instruments in loud environments.

Frequency Response and Versatility

The Electro-Voice RE320 boasts a frequency response that accommodates a broad range of instruments, from vocals to bass amps. Its "Dual Personality" feature allows users to switch between different EQ settings, providing flexibility for recording and live sound. On the other hand, the Shure BETA 52A's frequency response is shaped specifically for kick drums and other bass instruments. This specialization allows it to deliver low-frequency bass punch and studio-quality sound, making it an excellent choice for drummers.

Setup and Usability

In terms of setup, the Shure BETA 52A features a built-in dynamic locking stand adapter that simplifies installation, particularly inside a kick drum. This thoughtful design minimizes the risk of the microphone slipping during performances. The Electro-Voice RE320, while also user-friendly, does not include a locking adapter, which may require additional setup time in certain situations. Musicians who frequently perform may find the BETA 52A's ease of use particularly appealing.

Noise Isolation and Feedback Rejection

The Shure BETA 52A excels in noise isolation and feedback rejection, thanks to its supercardioid pattern and advanced pneumatic shock mount system. These features minimize the transmission of mechanical noise and vibration, essential for maintaining clarity in live settings. The Electro-Voice RE320 includes a humbucking coil to reduce unwanted hum and buzz, making it effective in various environments. However, it may not provide the same level of feedback rejection as the BETA 52A, which could be a crucial factor for loud performances.

Price and Value for Money

With the Electro-Voice RE320 priced at $315.00 and the Shure BETA 52A at $197.00, the BETA 52A is about 37% cheaper. This significant price difference may make the BETA 52A a more appealing option for budget-conscious musicians, especially those focused on kick drum applications. However, the RE320 offers versatile features that justify its higher price for users needing a multi-functional microphone.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Shure BETA 52A hinges on your specific needs. If you require a versatile microphone capable of handling various instruments and vocals, the RE320 might be your best bet despite its higher price. Conversely, if you're primarily focused on kick drum performance and seek an affordable, high-quality option, the BETA 52A stands out as an excellent choice. Consider your budget, intended use, and desired features when making your decision.