vsversusfinder

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs Shure BETA 56A Snare and Tom Microphone -

Updated August 2026 — Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone wins on sound quality and durability, Shure BETA 56A Snare and Tom Microphone - wins on feedback rejecti.

The Electro-Voice RE320 offers versatility and superior sound quality, while the Shure BETA 56A excels in specialized drum applications at a lower price.

Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better

Versatility

RE320 is suitable for various audio applications.

Sound Quality

RE320 has a customizable EQ switch for enhanced sound.

Durability

RE320 is built for various recording environments.

Why Shure BETA 56A Snare and Tom Microphone - is better

Price

BETA 56A is significantly cheaper.

Compact Design

BETA 56A's design is ideal for close miking.

Market Popularity

BETA 56A has a better sales rank.

Overall score

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone
85
Shure BETA 56A Snare and Tom Microphone -
75

Specifications

SpecElectro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneShure BETA 56A Snare and Tom Microphone -
TypeDynamic CardioidDynamic Supercardioid
Frequency Response20-20,000 Hz50-16,000 Hz
Weight1.5 lbs1.0 lbs
EQ SwitchYesNo
Pickup PatternCardioidSupercardioid

Dimension comparison

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneShure BETA 56A Snare and Tom Microphone -

Overview of the Electro-Voice RE320 and Shure BETA 56A

The Electro-Voice RE320 is priced at $315.00, while the Shure BETA 56A comes in at $170.00, making it about 17% cheaper. This price difference might be a significant factor for those looking to balance quality with budget. Both microphones are tailored for specific audio applications, yet they cater to different needs and preferences within the realm of studio microphones.

Design and Build Quality

The Electro-Voice RE320 features a robust design, highlighted by its dynamic cardioid pattern and a kick drum EQ switch. This construction allows for significant durability, making it an ideal choice for various recording environments. In contrast, the Shure BETA 56A boasts a compact design with a pivoting capability, specifically engineered for close miking applications. Its hardened steel mesh grille enhances its durability and resistance to wear, making it suitable for demanding environments like live performances and studio recordings.

Sound Quality

When it comes to sound quality, the Electro-Voice RE320 excels with its two-position EQ switch that offers either a flat response or a tailored kick drum EQ. This feature enables it to capture a punchy sound that suits not only vocals but also instruments like horns and guitar amps. The Shure BETA 56A, on the other hand, is engineered with a uniform supercardioid pattern that provides high gain-before-feedback and excellent off-axis rejection. This makes it particularly effective for drums and amplified instruments, ensuring studio-quality sound in various settings.

Frequency Response

The Electro-Voice RE320 is designed with a specific frequency response tailored to different audio needs, particularly for broadcast applications. Its dual personality switch allows for versatility, adjusting the response to suit kick drums or other instruments. The Shure BETA 56A has a frequency response range of 50 to 16,000 Hz, making it adept for close miking of tom-toms and other percussion instruments. Both microphones deliver impressive frequency responses, but the RE320 offers a more customizable approach for varied recording scenarios.

Versatility in Use

The versatility of the Electro-Voice RE320 allows it to shine in various audio applications, from vocals to instruments. Its design is particularly beneficial for those who may switch between different sound sources frequently. Conversely, the Shure BETA 56A is specifically tailored for drums, making it less versatile but highly specialized. While the RE320 can adapt to multiple contexts, the BETA 56A is focused on delivering exceptional performance for close-miking situations, especially in live settings.

Setup and Convenience

The setup processes for both microphones vary, with the Electro-Voice RE320 featuring a straightforward design complemented by an integrated humbucking coil to minimize interference. In contrast, the Shure BETA 56A includes a built-in dynamic locking stand adapter and an XLR connector, simplifying installation and offering greater flexibility during live performances. This ease of setup can be a deciding factor for users who prioritize quick and efficient mic placement.

Market Performance

The Electro-Voice RE320 currently holds a sales rank of 76,619, indicating a moderate level of popularity in the market. Meanwhile, the Shure BETA 56A performs significantly better with a sales rank of 32,479, suggesting a stronger preference among users. This difference in market performance might reflect the BETA 56A's reputation as a go-to mic for drummers and live performers.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Shure BETA 56A depends largely on your specific needs and budget. If you're looking for a versatile microphone that excels across various recording contexts, the RE320 may be worth the higher investment at $315.00. On the other hand, if you primarily need a microphone for close miking of drums or amplified instruments, the Shure BETA 56A offers excellent performance at a more accessible price of $170.00. Ultimately, both microphones deliver quality sound, but your choice should align with your particular audio requirements and financial considerations.