Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs Shure PGA56 Dynamic Microphone

Price Comparison

When it comes to price, the Shure PGA56 is significantly more affordable than the Electro-Voice RE320. The current price of the PGA56 is $90.00, while the RE320 is priced at $315.00, making the Shure about 71% cheaper. This substantial price difference may be a decisive factor for budget-conscious consumers, particularly those just starting in music production or live sound. While both microphones deliver quality audio, the cost-effectiveness of the PGA56 makes it an attractive option for casual users or those needing multiple mics for various instruments.

Build Quality and Durability

The Shure PGA56 stands out with its highly durable design, specifically tailored for close-mic applications on snare drums and toms. Its industrial design enhances its robust construction, ensuring it can withstand the rigors of live performances and studio sessions. In contrast, the Electro-Voice RE320 is also designed for durability, featuring an integrated humbucking coil that minimizes unwanted noise. However, the PGA56's quick-release swivel joint adds an additional layer of convenience for positioning, which can be crucial in fast-paced environments. Both microphones are built to last, but the PGA56's design may offer a slight edge in practical use.

Sound Quality

In terms of sound quality, both microphones excel in their respective domains, but they cater to different needs. The Electro-Voice RE320 is specifically designed for broadcasting and offers a unique Dual Personality EQ switch, which allows for tailored sound reproduction whether for kick drums or general music applications. This feature is particularly beneficial for achieving a punchy sound during recordings. On the other hand, the Shure PGA56 is engineered for clear reproduction of sound sources, particularly snare drums and toms. Its cardioid polar pattern efficiently picks up sound while rejecting background noise, making it ideal for live settings. While both microphones provide excellent sound quality, the choice depends on the specific audio needs of the user.

Versatility

When considering versatility, the Electro-Voice RE320 shines with its dual EQ settings, accommodating a range of instruments including vocals, horns, and guitars, in addition to drums. This makes it a versatile choice for musicians and broadcasters alike. Conversely, the Shure PGA56 is tailored specifically for snare and tom applications, which may limit its versatility in comparison to the RE320. However, its design and included drum mount facilitate quick attachment to drum rims without needing a mic stand, making it convenient for drummers. While the RE320 offers broader applications, the PGA56's design caters efficiently to specific instruments.

User Experience

User experience can greatly affect microphone choice. The Shure PGA56 features a swivel joint with a quick-release latch, allowing for rapid adjustments, which is essential in live performance situations. This design is reminiscent of bicycle component-locking technology, ensuring reliability and ease of use. In contrast, the Electro-Voice RE320’s two-position EQ switch enhances user control over sound, but it lacks the quick adjustment capabilities of the PGA56. For users who prioritize swift positioning during performances, the PGA56 provides a more user-friendly experience, while the RE320 is better suited for studio settings where sound manipulation is critical.

Sales Rank and Popularity

Sales rank can indicate popularity and consumer trust. The Shure PGA56 boasts a sales rank of 24,055, while the Electro-Voice RE320 has a rank of 76,619. This suggests that the PGA56 may be a more popular choice among users, particularly for its price and application in live sound. The higher sales rank of the PGA56 indicates a strong preference among musicians, especially drummers, for its reliable performance in demanding environments. While the RE320 is respected for its quality, the PGA56's popularity may reflect its broader appeal and accessibility for a wider audience.

Brand Reputation

Both Electro-Voice and Shure are renowned brands in the audio industry, known for producing high-quality microphones. Electro-Voice has a solid reputation for its broadcast microphones, particularly in studio settings, while Shure is widely recognized for its durable and reliable live sound equipment. The RE320’s design emphasizes versatility and studio application, catering to professional audio needs. On the other hand, the PGA56's focused design for snare and tom applications underscores Shure's commitment to practical solutions for live sound. Brand reputation plays a role in consumer choice, but the specific needs of the user will ultimately guide their decision.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Shure PGA56 depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a versatile microphone with exceptional sound quality for a variety of instruments, the RE320 is a strong contender, despite its higher price of $315.00. However, if you require a durable, budget-friendly microphone specifically for snare or tom applications, the Shure PGA56, priced at $90.00, offers excellent value and user-friendly features. Ultimately, the decision hinges on whether you prioritize versatility or a more specialized, cost-effective option.