Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone
Updated August 2026 — Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone wins on versatility and sound quality, Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone wins on value for money.
The Electro-Voice RE320 offers superior versatility and sound quality, while the Shure PGA57 provides excellent value for budget-conscious users.
Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better
Price
RE320 is a premium mic with advanced features.
Versatility
RE320 is suitable for various applications.
Sound Quality
RE320 has specialized EQ for kick drums.
Why Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone is better
Affordability
PGA57 is significantly cheaper.
Popularity
PGA57 has a better sales rank.
Portability
PGA57 includes a carrying pouch.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone | Shure PGA57 Dynamic Microphone |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Polar Pattern | Cardioid | Cardioid |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz-18kHz | 50Hz-15kHz |
| Weight | 1.5 lbs | 0.5 lbs |
| Included Accessories | None | Stand adapter, pouch |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Electro-Voice RE320 and Shure PGA57
The Electro-Voice RE320 and Shure PGA57 are both professional-grade dynamic microphones designed for different applications. The RE320 is priced at $315.00, making it a premium option, while the PGA57 is considerably more affordable at $71.00. This significant price difference of about 77% gives potential buyers a clear indication of the market positioning for each mic.
Design and Build Quality
Both microphones feature durable designs, but their aesthetic and functional approaches vary. The Electro-Voice RE320 boasts a rugged and iconic look typical of broadcast mics, ensuring it can withstand the rigors of studio and live environments. In contrast, the Shure PGA57 presents an updated industrial design with a sleek black metallic finish, aiming for unobtrusive visual presence during performances. While both are built to last, the RE320's robust reputation in professional settings may give it an edge for users prioritizing durability.
Sound Quality
When it comes to sound reproduction, the Electro-Voice RE320 is tailored specifically for various applications, including vocals and instruments, with a notable emphasis on kick drums thanks to its dual EQ switch. This feature allows users to optimize the mic’s frequency response for either a flat response or a tailored boost for kick drums, making it versatile for both studio and live settings. The PGA57, while also designed for clear sound reproduction, is focused on amplified instruments and acoustic drums. Each microphone excels in its intended use, but the RE320’s specialized features may provide a more punchy sound for bass-heavy applications.
Usage Scenarios
The usage scenarios for the Electro-Voice RE320 and Shure PGA57 highlight their intended purposes. The RE320 is ideal for recording vocals, horns, guitar amps, and drums, making it a favorite among studio professionals and live sound engineers. Its dual personality feature allows for quick adjustments based on the source material. On the other hand, the PGA57 is explicitly designed for amplified instruments and acoustic drums, which makes it suitable for musicians and bands. The choice between the two largely depends on whether the user needs versatility (RE320) or focused performance for instruments (PGA57).
Connectivity and Accessories
In terms of connectivity, the Electro-Voice RE320 has a straightforward setup suitable for various recording equipment. The PGA57, meanwhile, offers flexibility with two options: one that includes a 15-foot XLR-XLR cable and one without. This can be a deciding factor for new users who may need the added convenience of a cable included in their purchase. Additionally, the PGA57 comes with a stand adapter and carrying pouch, enhancing its portability and usability in different settings.
Price Comparison
The price difference between the two microphones is substantial, with the RE320 retailing at $315.00 and the PGA57 at $71.00. This represents about a 77% difference, positioning the RE320 as a premium choice for serious audio professionals while the PGA57 appeals to budget-conscious users or those needing reliable instruments without breaking the bank. The RE320’s higher price tag reflects its advanced features and versatility, but for many users, the PGA57 provides excellent value for the specific tasks it is designed for.
Market Position and Sales Rank
In terms of market performance, the Electro-Voice RE320 has a sales rank of 76,619, indicating its niche appeal among high-end microphone users. In comparison, the Shure PGA57 has a significantly better sales rank of 20,657, showing that it is a more popular choice among consumers, likely due to its affordability and suitability for a wider range of users. This difference in sales rank may influence buyers looking for proven market performance versus specialized features.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Shure PGA57 hinges on your specific needs and budget. If you are seeking a versatile microphone capable of handling various recording scenarios, particularly with a focus on bass-heavy sounds, the RE320 is worth the investment at $315.00. However, if you're looking for a reliable, budget-friendly option primarily for amplified instruments and drums, the PGA57 at $71.00 offers exceptional value without sacrificing quality. Assessing your priorities will guide you toward the right choice for your audio needs.

