vsversusfinder

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs Shure SM57 Dynamic Microphone – Wired Cardioid XLR

Updated July 2026 — Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone wins on price and specialization, Shure SM57 Dynamic Microphone – Wired Cardioid XLR wins on versatility and user feedback.

The Shure SM57 offers excellent versatility and value for a lower price, while the Electro-Voice RE320 excels in specialized broadcast applications.

Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better

Price

The RE320 is significantly more expensive.

Specialization

The RE320 is tailored for specific recording scenarios.

Low-End Focus

The RE320 has a unique EQ for kick drums.

Why Shure SM57 Dynamic Microphone – Wired Cardioid XLR is better

Versatility

The SM57 is suitable for a wide range of instruments.

Durability

The SM57 is known for its rugged construction.

Affordability

The SM57 is much cheaper than the RE320.

Overall score

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone
75
Shure SM57 Dynamic Microphone – Wired Cardioid XLR
90

Specifications

SpecElectro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneShure SM57 Dynamic Microphone – Wired Cardioid XLR
TypeDynamicDynamic
Pickup PatternCardioidCardioid
Frequency Response20Hz-18kHz40Hz-15kHz
Weight1.5 lbs0.5 lbs
Sales Rank76619279

Dimension comparison

Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast MicrophoneShure SM57 Dynamic Microphone – Wired Cardioid XLR

Overview

When comparing the Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone and the Shure SM57 Dynamic Microphone, one can see a significant difference in price and intended use. The RE320 is priced at $315.00, while the SM57 is about 69% cheaper at $98.00. This price disparity reflects the different design philosophies and target markets for each microphone, making it essential to understand their unique features and applications.

Design and Build Quality

Both microphones are designed with durability in mind, but they cater to different needs in terms of construction. The Shure SM57 is known for its road-tested durability, making it a favorite among musicians and engineers for both studio and live settings. Its rugged construction allows it to handle high sound pressure levels and frequent transport without compromising performance. In contrast, the Electro-Voice RE320 also emphasizes durability but adds a layer of sophistication with its two-position EQ switch, designed primarily for recording music with a focus on bass instruments.

Sound Quality

Sound quality is a critical aspect of any microphone, and both the RE320 and SM57 excel in this area but in different contexts. The Shure SM57 features a contoured frequency response that enhances attack and clarity, making it ideal for capturing the nuances of instruments like guitar amplifiers and snare drums. Its cardioid pickup pattern isolates sound sources effectively, reducing bleed from surrounding noise. On the other hand, the Electro-Voice RE320 comes equipped with a unique "Dual Personality" frequency response switch, allowing users to choose between a flat response or an EQ tailored specifically for kick drums. This feature gives the RE320 an edge in situations where low-end punch is desired, particularly in broadcast settings.

Versatility in Applications

When it comes to versatility, the Shure SM57 is often considered a true studio and stage staple. Its ability to adapt to a wide range of applications—from live sound to studio recording—makes it a go-to choice for many professionals. The SM57 excels in close-miking scenarios, working effectively with various instruments, including brass and acoustic guitars. Conversely, the Electro-Voice RE320 is more specialized, focusing on broadcast and specific recording scenarios. While it can handle vocals and various instruments, its design leans more towards delivering punchy low frequencies, particularly useful for drums and bass.

Performance in Live Settings

In live settings, the Shure SM57 has established itself as a reliable performer. Its focused low-bleed capture allows it to perform exceptionally well in complex environments where background noise is prevalent. This makes it a top choice for musicians performing in crowded venues. The Electro-Voice RE320, while capable in live situations, is primarily tailored for studio use, especially for those needing an effective microphone for broadcast or intricate recordings. Therefore, while both microphones can be used live, the SM57 is likely to deliver more consistent performance in such settings.

Price and Value

The price difference between the two microphones is significant; the Electro-Voice RE320 costs $315.00, whereas the Shure SM57 is priced at $98.00. This makes the SM57 about 69% cheaper than the RE320. Given this disparity, the value proposition of each microphone depends on the specific needs of the user. For those seeking a versatile, reliable workhorse for various instruments, the SM57 offers excellent value without compromising sound quality. In contrast, the RE320 may justify its higher price for users specifically looking for a microphone that excels in broadcast applications and low-frequency response.

User Experience and Feedback

User feedback shows that both microphones have their loyal advocates. The Shure SM57 consistently ranks high in sales, holding a bestseller rank of 279, indicating its popularity and reliability among users. Its reputation for clarity and durability contributes to its positive reviews, with many praising its performance across different instruments. On the other hand, the Electro-Voice RE320, with a sales rank of 76,619, is appreciated for its specialized features, though it appeals to a more niche market focused on broadcast quality. Users often highlight its two-position EQ switch as a game-changer for achieving the desired sound in specific recording scenarios.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Shure SM57 boils down to your specific needs and budget. If you require a versatile microphone that can handle a variety of instruments and live settings, the Shure SM57 is a fantastic option, especially given its affordability at $98.00. However, if you're focused on achieving a professional broadcast sound with enhanced low-end frequencies, the Electro-Voice RE320, priced at $315.00, would be the better choice. Ultimately, understanding your recording or performance context will guide you to the right decision between these two excellent microphones.