Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone vs Shure Wireless BETA 98H/C Microphone - Miniature
Updated August 2026 — Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone wins on versatility and build, Shure Wireless BETA 98H/C Microphone - Miniature wins on price and popularity.
The Electro-Voice RE320 is ideal for studio recording, while the Shure Wireless BETA 98H/C excels in live performance settings. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone is better
Sound Quality
The RE320 offers a unique EQ switch for tailored sound.
Versatility
The RE320 is suitable for various instruments and vocals.
Build Quality
The RE320 has a robust design for studio and live use.
Why Shure Wireless BETA 98H/C Microphone - Miniature is better
Price
The BETA 98H/C is significantly cheaper.
Compact Design
The BETA 98H/C is designed for easy mounting on instruments.
Sales Rank
The BETA 98H/C has a higher sales rank, indicating popularity.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Electro-Voice RE320 Cardioid Dynamic Broadcast Microphone | Shure Wireless BETA 98H/C Microphone - Miniature |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Dynamic | Condenser |
| Pattern | Cardioid | Cardioid |
| Max SPL | N/A | High |
| EQ Switch | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | XLR | TA4F |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Electro-Voice RE320 and Shure Wireless BETA 98H/C Microphones
When comparing the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Shure Wireless BETA 98H/C microphones, the first thing to note is their intended use. The RE320 is designed primarily for recording music, making it ideal for vocals and a variety of instruments, while the BETA 98H/C excels in live performance settings, especially for wind and percussion instruments. The price difference is significant, with the RE320 retailing at $315.00 compared to the BETA 98H/C's price of $186.00, making the Shure model about 41% cheaper.
Build Quality and Design
The build quality of the Electro-Voice RE320 is robust, featuring a durable design that can withstand the rigors of studio and live environments. Its dynamic cardioid nature and the integrated humbucking coil help reduce unwanted noise. The Shure Wireless BETA 98H/C, on the other hand, is compact and designed for easy mounting on instruments, with a gooseneck and ratcheting swivel joint for precise positioning. While the RE320's durability is noteworthy, the BETA 98H/C's design is tailored for performance flexibility, allowing it to adapt to different instrument types effectively.
Sound Quality
In terms of sound quality, the Electro-Voice RE320 shines with its "Dual Personality" frequency response switch, which allows for tailored sound profiles. This feature is particularly beneficial for achieving a punchy sound when recording bass drums or other instruments. The BETA 98H/C also delivers excellent sound quality, with tailored frequency response and high maximum SPL, making it suitable for handling brass, woodwind, and percussion instruments. Both microphones offer high-quality audio, but their optimization for different scenarios sets them apart.
Versatility in Use
The versatility of the Electro-Voice RE320 is evident in its application across multiple instruments, including vocals, horns, and guitars. Its EQ switch further enhances this versatility, allowing users to switch between a flat response and a kick drum EQ. The Shure Wireless BETA 98H/C excels in live settings, providing high gain before feedback and superior off-axis sound rejection, making it a top choice for stage performances. While both microphones are versatile, the RE320 is more suited for studio use, whereas the BETA 98H/C is tailored for live applications.
Connectivity and Setup
The Electro-Voice RE320 is a straightforward dynamic microphone that connects via standard XLR cables, making it easy to integrate into most studio setups. In contrast, the Shure Wireless BETA 98H/C requires a compatible bodypack transmitter, which is sold separately. This necessity can complicate setup for those not already equipped with Shure wireless systems. However, once paired, the BETA 98H/C offers exceptional freedom of movement, a significant advantage for performers.
Target Audience
The target audience for the Electro-Voice RE320 includes recording engineers, musicians, and podcasters who need a reliable microphone for various instruments and vocal types. Its higher price point reflects its studio-quality performance and versatility. The Shure Wireless BETA 98H/C, however, is aimed at live performers, particularly those in the brass and percussion sectors, who need a mic that can handle high SPL levels and provide excellent feedback rejection. The distinct target audiences highlight the different applications for each microphone.
Sales Rank and Popularity
The Electro-Voice RE320 has a sales rank of 76,619, while the Shure Wireless BETA 98H/C enjoys a significantly higher rank of 6,402, indicating its popularity, especially among live performers. This difference in sales rank can be attributed to the BETA 98H/C's specific design for live instruments, fulfilling a niche market that demands reliable and high-quality sound in performance settings. The Shure model's popularity may also reflect its perceived value for money compared to the RE320.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Shure Wireless BETA 98H/C ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you are looking for a versatile studio microphone that excels in recording various instruments and vocals, the RE320 is a great choice despite its higher price. However, if you are a live performer needing a compact, reliable microphone for brass or percussion instruments, the BETA 98H/C is the superior option, offering excellent sound quality at a more accessible price point.

