Epson EcoTank ET-2800 Wireless Color vs HP Smart Tank Plus 651 Wireless

Design and build quality

The Epson EcoTank ET-2800 and the HP Smart Tank Plus 651 both utilize a tank-based design intended to reduce waste and improve longevity. Epson emphasizes zero cartridge waste, noting that using an EcoTank printer helps reduce the amount of cartridge waste ending in landfills. The unit is designed to keep offices running smoothly with a focus on detailed prints. HP markets its device as the only tank printer built to last, suggesting a robust construction aimed at reliability. Both manufacturers highlight durability, though HP explicitly claims the device requires no complicated maintenance. Physical build specifics beyond these marketing claims are not detailed in the provided data, but both units appear designed for long-term home or office use without the need for traditional cartridge replacements.

Print Speed and Performance

Performance metrics vary in transparency between the two models. The Epson EcoTank ET-2800 specifies a print speed of up to 10 pages per minute. This specification allows users to accomplish large jobs with ease, according to the manufacturer. The device utilizes Micro Piezo Heat-Free Technology to produce vivid and detailed prints. In contrast, the HP Smart Tank Plus 651 does not provide a specific pages-per-minute figure in the available data. HP claims the printer keeps printing well after competitors have quit, offering sharper text and richer colors. Without a confirmed speed number for the HP model, the Epson unit holds a clear advantage in documented performance throughput for users who prioritize known speed metrics.

Ink Capacity and Yield

Ink capacity is a primary selling point for both supertank printers. The Epson EcoTank ET-2800 provides specific yield numbers, stating that each ink bottle set is equivalent to about 80 individual cartridges. Users can expect to print up to 4,500 pages in black and 7,500 pages in color per set. This level of detail allows for precise cost calculations over time. The HP Smart Tank Plus 651 states that users can get thousands of pages of cartridge-free printing but does not specify exact black or color page counts. Both models include enough ink for up to 2 years of usage. The Epson model's specific yield data provides a tangible advantage for users needing to estimate long-term supply needs accurately.

Connectivity and Features

Connectivity options are essential for modern printing tasks. The Epson EcoTank ET-2800 is described as a Wireless Color printer, enabling networked printing without physical cables. The HP Smart Tank Plus 651 also features wireless printing but explicitly adds mobile printing capabilities to its key features list. HP notes that the printer is fully loaded with savings and includes WiFi for home use. Both devices support print, copy, and scan functions, categorized as All-in-One solutions. While Epson focuses on the wireless aspect, HP's explicit mention of mobile printing suggests potentially broader compatibility with smartphones and tablets, giving it a slight edge in connectivity feature descriptions.

Refill System and Maintenance

Maintenance and refilling processes are designed to be user-friendly for both units. Epson promotes stress-free printing with up to 2 years of ink in the box, reducing out-of-ink frustrations. The system eliminates tiny, expensive ink cartridges. HP highlights a mess-free refill system where users simply plug ink bottles into the cartridge-free ink tank and let them drain. HP claims this process involves no squeezing and no spilling. Both manufacturers aim to reduce the hassle associated with traditional ink management. Epson notes that replacement ink sets also provide up to 2 years of ink, ensuring consistent maintenance intervals. HP emphasizes that there is no complicated maintenance required, positioning the device as reliable and easy to count on.

Cost Efficiency and Savings

Cost efficiency is a major differentiator in the supertank category. Epson claims dramatic savings on replacement ink, stating users can save up to 90% with replacement ink bottles versus ink cartridges. This claim is backed by the high page yield equivalents. HP states the printer is fully loaded with savings and designed for home use, but does not provide a specific percentage savings claim in the provided text. The Epson model's specific 90% savings figure offers a concrete metric for budget-conscious buyers. Both models eliminate the need for frequent cartridge purchases, but Epson provides more detailed data regarding the financial benefits of switching to their bottle-based system.

Price and Value

The price difference between the two models is significant. The Epson EcoTank ET-2800 is listed at $239.99, while the HP Smart Tank Plus 651 is priced at $329.89. This represents a difference of approximately $90 in favor of the Epson model. Given that both include up to 2 years of ink, the lower entry price of the Epson unit offers immediate value. HP positions its higher price point with claims of being the last printer you will ever need, suggesting long-term durability. However, without specific yield numbers to justify the higher cost, the Epson model presents a stronger value proposition based on the available pricing and specification data. The lower cost combined with confirmed yields makes the Epson option more accessible.

Which one should you buy?

Choosing between these printers depends on budget and the need for specific performance data. If you require confirmed print speeds and page yields to calculate operating costs, the Epson EcoTank ET-2800 is the superior choice. It offers a lower upfront cost of $239.99 and transparent specifications including 10 ppm speed and 4,500 black page yield. If you prioritize mobile connectivity features and prefer a mess-free refill system description, the HP Smart Tank Plus 651 may appeal despite the higher $329.89 price tag. Both provide up to 2 years of included ink. However, for most users seeking value and documented performance metrics, the Epson model provides a more compelling package based on the available product data.