Farberware 0.9 Cu. Ft. Countertop vs SHARP Countertop Microwave Oven with
Updated April 2026 — Farberware 0.9 Cu. Ft. Countertop wins on value, SHARP Countertop Microwave Oven with wins on capacity and defrosting.
$109.99Farberware 0.9 Cu. Ft. Countertop Microwave Oven – 900 Watts Power, Auto Cook Settings, Defrost, Easy Clean and Child Safety Lock - Stainless Steel
Farberware
$139.99SHARP Countertop Microwave Oven with Removable 12.4" Carousel Turntable, 1000 Watt, 1.1 Cubic Feet, Stainless Steel
Sharp
The Sharp Countertop Microwave Oven offers superior performance with higher wattage and larger capacity, making it better for versatile cooking needs. However, the Farberware model provides a compact, budget-friendly option suitable for smaller spaces. Buyers prioritizing power and features should choose Sharp, while those needing basic functionality at a lower price should choose Farberware.
Why Farberware 0.9 Cu. Ft. Countertop is better
Lower Purchase Price
Costs $109.99 compared to $139.99
Compact Footprint
0.9 Cu. Ft. capacity fits small kitchens
Specific Auto Menus
Includes 8 auto-cook settings
Why SHARP Countertop Microwave Oven with is better
Higher Power Output
1000 Watts versus 900 Watts
Larger Interior Capacity
1.1 Cu. Ft. versus 0.9 Cu. Ft.
Larger Turntable
12.4 inch Carousel turntable
Advanced Defrosting
Weight and Time Defrost options
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Farberware 0.9 Cu. Ft. Countertop | SHARP Countertop Microwave Oven with |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Farberware | Sharp |
| Price | $109.99 | $139.99 |
| Capacity | 0.9 Cu. Ft. | 1.1 Cu. Ft. |
| Power Output | 900 Watts | 1000 Watts |
| Power Levels | 10 | 10 |
| Auto-Cook Settings | 8 | Auto Cook |
| Turntable Size | — | 12.4 inches |
| Material | — | Stainless |
| Defrost Type | General | Weight and Time |
| Express Cook | Yes | Yes up to 6 mins |
Dimension comparison
Design and build quality
The physical construction of these microwaves reflects their intended use cases. The Sharp model lists Stainless steel in its feature set, suggesting a durable exterior finish that may resist fingerprints and blend well with modern appliances. The Farberware unit does not specify its exterior material in the provided data, focusing instead on its functional compactness. Both units are designed as countertop appliances, meaning they sit on a flat surface rather than being built into cabinetry. The Sharp model includes a 12.4-inch Carousel turntable, which indicates a mechanism designed to rotate food for even exposure to microwave energy. The Farberware design prioritizes a smaller footprint, making it physically easier to place in constrained areas like dorm rooms or office breakrooms where counter space is at a premium.
Capacity and interior space
Interior volume is a critical differentiator between these two models. The Farberware microwave offers 0.9 Cu. Ft. of capacity. This size is explicitly marketed as ideal for small kitchens, dorms, RVs, and office breakrooms. It is sufficient for reheating single plates or small bowls but may struggle with larger casserole dishes. In contrast, the Sharp model provides a medium-sized 1.1 Cu. Ft. capacity. This additional space allows for larger cookware and more substantial meal preparation. Users who frequently cook for families or need to accommodate larger dinner plates will find the Sharp interior more accommodating. The difference of 0.2 Cu. Ft. may seem small numerically, but it translates to noticeable flexibility in what can fit inside the cooking chamber.
Power output and cooking speed
Cooking speed and efficiency are largely determined by wattage. The Farberware unit operates at 900 Watts of power. This level of output delivers fast and efficient cooking for everyday meals and snacks, suitable for standard reheating tasks. The Sharp model steps up to 1000 Watts. This higher power output generally results in faster heating times and more consistent cooking performance, especially for denser foods. While both units are capable of handling daily tasks, the 100-watt difference gives the Sharp model an edge in performance intensity. Users who prioritize speed when boiling water or heating frozen entrees will likely notice the difference in cook times between the 900-watt and 1000-watt configurations.
Cooking features and presets
Both microwaves include automated features to simplify the cooking process. The Farberware model comes with 8 auto-cook settings. These one-touch menus cover popcorn, pizza, potato, frozen vegetables, fresh vegetables, beverages, meat, and bread. This provides specific optimization for common food items without manual input. The Sharp model includes Auto Cook for popular menu items and features Orville Redenbacher's Certified Popcorn Presets. This certification suggests the popcorn setting is tuned specifically for that brand's requirements. Additionally, the Sharp unit supports 2-stage cooking, allowing users to program two different power levels or times in sequence. This feature adds versatility for recipes that require searing followed by simmering, which the Farberware's standard auto settings do not explicitly mention.
Ease of use and controls
User interface design impacts daily convenience. Both models feature an Express Cook function and a "+30 seconds" key. The Farberware allows users to quickly start cooking or add time with the press of a button, streamlining the reheating process. The Sharp model offers a convenient "+30 seconds" key for instant start and an Express Cook function with a single press up to 6 minutes of cooking time. Both units utilize 10 power levels, allowing users to adjust intensity for precision heating and cooking control. This parity ensures that regardless of the model chosen, users have granular control over how much energy is emitted during operation. The presence of physical buttons for common tasks on both units reduces the need to navigate complex digital menus for simple actions.
Defrosting capabilities
Thawing frozen ingredients requires careful power modulation to avoid cooking the edges while the center remains frozen. The Farberware specifications mention defrosting as part of its 900-watt capability but do not detail specific defrost modes beyond the general power levels. The Sharp model explicitly lists Weight and Time Defrost for quick and accurate thawing. This dual-option approach allows users to either input the weight of the item for automatic calculation or set a specific time manually. This level of specificity can prevent overcooking delicate items like meat or poultry during the thawing process. For users who frequently cook from frozen, the dedicated defrost logic on the Sharp model offers a more tailored experience.
Price and value
Cost is a significant factor in the decision-making process. The Farberware microwave is priced at $109.99. This lower price point makes it an accessible option for budget-conscious buyers or those needing a secondary unit for a specific location like an office. The Sharp model is priced at $139.99, representing a $30 premium over the Farberware. This higher cost is justified by the increased capacity, higher wattage, and additional features like 2-stage cooking and certified popcorn presets. Value depends on the user's needs; those who need basic functionality will find better value in the Farberware, while those seeking performance upgrades will find the Sharp worth the extra investment. Neither model has review ratings available in the provided data to indicate long-term reliability.
Which one should you buy?
Choosing between these microwaves depends on your specific kitchen constraints and cooking habits. If you are limited by counter space or need a unit for a dormitory or RV, the Farberware 0.9 Cu. Ft. model is the logical choice due to its compact design and lower price. It provides essential features like 10 power levels and 8 auto settings without unnecessary complexity. However, if you require a primary kitchen microwave capable of handling larger dishes and faster cooking times, the Sharp Countertop Microwave Oven is the superior option. Its 1000-watt power, 1.1 Cu. Ft. capacity, and advanced defrosting features provide greater versatility. Ultimately, the Sharp wins on performance metrics, while the Farberware wins on affordability and size efficiency.