vsversusfinder

Kellards Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio vs MOTU M4 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface

Updated August 2026 — Kellards Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio wins on software bundle, MOTU M4 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface wins on customer rating and sound quality.

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers a complete recording bundle ideal for beginners, while the MOTU M4 provides advanced features at a lower price.

Why Kellards Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio is better

Price

Focusrite is more expensive.

Bundle

Includes microphone and headphones.

User-friendly

Designed for beginners.

Why MOTU M4 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface is better

Price

MOTU is cheaper.

Connectivity

Offers 4-in/4-out capabilities.

Sales Rank

Higher sales rank indicates popularity.

Overall score

Kellards Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio
75
MOTU M4 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface
85

Specifications

SpecKellards Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C AudioMOTU M4 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface
AD/DA Conversion24-bit / 192 kHzNot specified
Microphone Preamps12
Loopback FeatureYesYes
MonitoringAuto GainHardware Monitoring
Included SoftwarePro Tools, Ableton6+GB Free Content

Dimension comparison

Kellards Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C AudioMOTU M4 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface

Overview of the Products

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio USB-C Audio Interface is priced at $359.99, while the MOTU M4 4x4 USB-C Audio Interface is about 25% cheaper at $268.00. This price difference might influence your decision based on your budget and specific needs.

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 offers a complete recording bundle, including a condenser microphone and headphones, making it ideal for singers, musicians, and podcasters. In contrast, the MOTU M4 focuses on providing robust audio capabilities with additional features suited for more advanced users.

Audio Quality and Performance

Both audio interfaces promise high-quality sound, but the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 excels with its 24-bit / 192 kHz AD/DA conversion, ensuring a dynamic range of up to 120 dB. This level of audio fidelity is characteristic of professional studio equipment.

On the other hand, the MOTU M4 features two microphone preamps and an LCD screen for monitoring, which can make it easier to manage your recordings. While the MOTU does not specify its exact conversion rates, its 4-in/4-out capabilities suggest versatility for various recording setups.

User Experience and Setup

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 is designed for user-friendliness, featuring Auto Gain mode and Clip Safe mode, which automatically sets recording levels and prevents clipping. This is particularly beneficial for beginners or those who want to streamline their recording process.

Conversely, the MOTU M4 provides hardware monitoring and loopback capabilities, which are advantageous for live streaming or complex recording scenarios. While both interfaces are designed to be easy to use, the Scarlett's additional automated features may appeal more to novices.

Included Accessories and Software

When it comes to included accessories, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio package stands out by offering a comprehensive bundle that includes a CM25 MkIII cardioid condenser microphone, SH-450 closed-back headphones, and a recording toolkit with software like Pro Tools Artist and Ableton Live Lite. This makes it a very attractive package for those starting in audio recording.

In contrast, while the MOTU M4 lacks a microphone and headphones in the box, it comes with over 6GB of free content for Mac, PC, and iOS users. This aspect caters to more experienced users who may already have their preferred equipment but want additional software and content to enhance their projects.

Versatility and Connectivity

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 features 2-in/2-out connectivity, which is sufficient for straightforward recording needs, such as a vocalist and an instrument. Its loopback feature also allows for easy streaming or podcasting.

On the other hand, the MOTU M4 offers 4-in/4-out connectivity, making it more versatile for users who need to record multiple sources simultaneously. This added flexibility could be a game-changer for musicians or podcasters who frequently collaborate or require more inputs.

Build Quality and Design

Both audio interfaces are designed with portability and durability in mind. The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 has a compact form factor that is ideal for traveling musicians or those with limited studio space.

The MOTU M4 also boasts a sturdy build, but its additional features like the LCD screen may make it slightly bulkier. The design of the MOTU M4 is user-friendly, showcasing its inputs and outputs clearly for easy access during recording sessions.

Brand Reputation and Sales Rank

The Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 holds a bestseller rank of 8,520, indicating its popularity among consumers. Focusrite has established a strong reputation in the audio industry, particularly for its user-friendly interfaces that cater to a wide range of audio professionals.

Meanwhile, the MOTU M4 has a significantly better sales rank of 2,256, suggesting that it is a favored choice among users seeking high-quality audio interfaces with advanced features. MOTU has a solid reputation for delivering professional-grade audio solutions, which may give potential buyers added confidence in their investment.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 Studio and the MOTU M4 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are a beginner looking for an all-in-one recording solution complete with a microphone and headphones, the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 at $359.99 is an excellent choice.

However, if you're an experienced audio professional seeking greater versatility and a lower price point of $268.00, the MOTU M4 may suit you better with its advanced features and high-quality performance. Both interfaces offer unique advantages, so consider what aspects are most important for your recording projects.