Kellards Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface vs MOTU M2 USB-C Audio Interface
Updated August 2026 — Kellards Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface wins on ease of use and price, MOTU M2 USB-C Audio Interface wins on popularity.
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers excellent value for beginners with its bundled accessories and user-friendly features, while the MOTU M2 provides robust performance for experienced users. Choose based on your experience level and needs.
Why Kellards Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface is better
Price
Scarlett Solo is $20 cheaper.
Bundled Accessories
Includes headphones and pop filter.
Ease of Use
Easy Start tool simplifies setup.
Why MOTU M2 USB-C Audio Interface is better
Sales Rank
MOTU M2 has a better sales rank.
Hardware Monitoring
MOTU M2 features hardware monitoring.
Free Content
MOTU M2 offers 6+GB of free content.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Kellards Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface | MOTU M2 USB-C Audio Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Range | 120 dB | Not specified |
| Audio Quality | 24-bit/192 kHz | 24-bit/192 kHz |
| Inputs | 2-in | 2-in |
| Outputs | 2-out | 2-out |
| USB Type | USB-C | USB-C |
Dimension comparison
Overview
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo USB-C Audio Interface and the MOTU M2 USB-C Audio Interface are two solid options for musicians and creators looking for reliable audio interfaces. The Scarlett Solo is priced at $179.99, making it about 10% cheaper than the MOTU M2, which retails for $199.95. Both interfaces cater to different needs, but understanding their features can help users make an informed choice.
Design and Build Quality
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo has a compact design that is perfect for musicians on the go. Its user-friendly interface allows easy setup, making it a favorite among singer-songwriters. In contrast, the MOTU M2 also boasts a sleek design, but its hardware monitoring feature adds an extra layer of functionality. The quality of both interfaces is commendable, but the Scarlett Solo’s bundled accessories, including closed-back studio monitor headphones and a pop filter, enhance its overall value, especially for beginners.
Sound Quality
When it comes to sound quality, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo excels with a dynamic range of up to 120 dB, thanks to its high-quality converters. This level of sound fidelity is comparable to that found in professional studios. The MOTU M2, while not explicitly detailed in its product description, features 24-bit/192 kHz audio quality, ensuring it delivers clear and detailed sound. Both interfaces provide a studio-quality experience, but the Scarlett Solo’s dynamic range gives it a slight edge in this category.
Features and Functionality
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo offers a range of features, including an ultra-low-noise microphone preamp and a Hi-Z instrument input, allowing users to record both a microphone and guitar simultaneously. It also includes an Air mode that enhances vocal presence. The MOTU M2, on the other hand, provides 6+GB of free content and USB-C compatibility, which is beneficial for users of various operating systems. While both interfaces support 2-in/2-out audio, the Scarlett Solo’s bundled software and plugins offer a more comprehensive recording toolkit for those starting in music production.
Ease of Use
Ease of use is where the Focusrite Scarlett Solo shines. Its Easy Start tool simplifies the setup process, enabling users to begin recording in minutes. This feature is particularly helpful for novices who may feel overwhelmed by technical setups. The MOTU M2, while user-friendly, does not emphasize ease of setup in its description, which could pose a slight barrier for beginners. Overall, the Scarlett Solo is more approachable for those new to audio interfaces.
Price Comparison
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo is priced at $179.99, making it about 10% less expensive than the MOTU M2, which is priced at $199.95. This price difference may significantly impact budget-conscious creators who are looking to get the most value for their money. Given the bundled accessories with the Scarlett Solo, such as studio monitor headphones and a pop filter, it may offer more bang for the buck in terms of overall package value.
Target Audience
The Focusrite Scarlett Solo is designed primarily for singer-songwriters and podcasters, offering a straightforward solution for recording vocals and instruments. Its inclusion of studio monitor headphones makes it appealing for those just starting their audio journey. Conversely, the MOTU M2 targets a more diverse audience, including musicians and content creators who require robust performance and expandability. Its slightly higher price point may attract those who are more experienced and demand additional features.
Customer Reception
Customer reception has been favorable for both interfaces, with the Focusrite Scarlett Solo holding a sales rank of 4258 and the MOTU M2 achieving a better sales rank of 1326. This suggests that the MOTU M2 is a more popular choice among consumers, potentially due to its additional features and robust performance. However, the Scarlett Solo’s strong reputation and bundled accessories make it an attractive option for entry-level users.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, both the Focusrite Scarlett Solo and the MOTU M2 USB-C Audio Interfaces offer unique features tailored to different users. If you are a beginner seeking an affordable option with excellent sound quality and useful accessories, the Focusrite Scarlett Solo at $179.99 is the better choice. However, if you are an experienced user looking for additional functionality and are willing to invest a bit more for enhanced features, the MOTU M2, priced at $199.95, may suit your needs better. Ultimately, your choice should reflect your specific requirements and budget.

