Frigidaire Curtis EFMIS151 Mini Portable Compact vs Frostorm 3.2 Cu Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer -
Updated July 2026 — Frigidaire Curtis EFMIS151 Mini Portable Compact wins on capacity, Frostorm 3.2 Cu Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer - wins on weight and height.
The Frigidaire is a budget-friendly, portable option, while the Frostorm offers larger capacity and better cooling performance. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Frigidaire Curtis EFMIS151 Mini Portable Compact is better
Price
Frigidaire is significantly cheaper at $35.58.
Portability
Frigidaire weighs only 3 lbs and includes a carrying handle.
Design
Frigidaire has a retro aesthetic appealing for personal use.
Why Frostorm 3.2 Cu Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer - is better
Capacity
Frostorm has a larger 3.2 cu ft capacity.
Freezer
Frostorm includes a dedicated freezer compartment.
Energy Efficiency
Frostorm consumes only 0.6 kWh per day.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Frigidaire Curtis EFMIS151 Mini Portable Compact | Frostorm 3.2 Cu Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer - |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Type | Thermoelectric | Compressor |
| Daily Cost | N/A | $0.10 |
| Power Options | 12V, AC | Standard |
| Temperature Range | 32°F to 150°F | -14°C to -24°C |
| Bestseller Rank | 29801 | 16 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
When it comes to mini fridges, the Frigidaire Curtis EFMIS151 Mini Portable Compact Personal Cooler Fridge and the Frostorm 3.2 Cu Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer stand out as popular options. The Frigidaire is priced at $35.58, making it a budget-friendly choice, while the Frostorm comes in at $166.64, which is about 368% more expensive. Each fridge offers unique features tailored to different needs and environments, making them suitable for a variety of users.
Design and Capacity
The Frigidaire is a compact mini fridge designed for portability, boasting a 4-liter capacity that can hold up to 6 cans. This makes it perfect for short trips or personal use, especially for skincare products or beverages. In contrast, the Frostorm features a larger 3.2 cu ft capacity, which includes a separate 0.35 cu ft freezer compartment. This larger size is ideal for those who need more storage space for groceries or meal prep. The Frostorm's single-door upright design allows for better organization compared to the Frigidaire's more limited space.
Energy Efficiency
Energy consumption is another important factor to consider. The Frostorm is designed to be energy-efficient, consuming only an average of 0.6 kWh per day and costing about $0.10 daily to run. This makes it a cost-effective option for long-term use. Meanwhile, the Frigidaire does not specify its energy consumption but operates on a thermoelectric cooling system, which is generally quieter and may be more efficient for smaller capacities. However, for those who prioritize energy savings, the Frostorm has a clear advantage.
Portability and Convenience
Portability is a key feature of the Frigidaire, which weighs just 3 lbs and includes a convenient carrying handle. This makes it easy to transport for picnics, road trips, or even to the office. The inclusion of a 12V car charger adds to its convenience for on-the-go use. On the other hand, the Frostorm, while not as portable, is designed for a more stationary setup, making it better suited for home or office use where frequent relocation is not necessary.
Cooling Performance
In terms of cooling performance, the Frigidaire claims to cool items to 26-28 degrees Fahrenheit below ambient room temperature, thanks to its thermoelectric system. This is effective for keeping beverages and snacks cool. The Frostorm, with its dedicated freezer compartment, can reach temperatures between -14°C to -24°C (-6°F to -11°F), making it suitable for ice-making and long-term frozen storage. For those who require more robust cooling capabilities, the Frostorm clearly outperforms the Frigidaire.
User-Friendly Features
Both fridges offer user-friendly designs, but they cater to different needs. The Frigidaire is equipped with a heavy-duty locking latch and door hinge, ensuring that items are securely stored during transport. Its retro charm adds a stylish aesthetic for personal spaces. The Frostorm, however, provides features like adjustable shelves and a reversible door, allowing users to customize their fridge layout according to their space. This flexibility makes the Frostorm more versatile for different room configurations.
Price Comparison
Price is a significant factor when choosing between these two models. The Frigidaire is priced at $35.58, making it an economical option for those on a budget. In contrast, the Frostorm's price of $166.64 is justified by its larger capacity and additional freezer compartment, but it is still about 368% more expensive than the Frigidaire. For consumers looking for a simple, portable solution, the Frigidaire is clearly the more affordable choice.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Frigidaire Curtis EFMIS151 Mini Portable Compact Personal Cooler Fridge and the Frostorm 3.2 Cu Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer depends on individual needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a budget-friendly, portable option primarily for personal use, the Frigidaire is the clear winner. However, if you require a larger capacity with more versatile storage options and robust cooling performance, the Frostorm is worth the investment. Consider your specific requirements, such as space, usage, and budget, to make the best choice for your needs.

